东盟保护主义和经济民族主义抬头背景下的区域经济建设

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of ASEAN Studies Pub Date : 2016-08-09 DOI:10.21512/JAS.V4I1.878
A. Chandra
{"title":"东盟保护主义和经济民族主义抬头背景下的区域经济建设","authors":"A. Chandra","doi":"10.21512/JAS.V4I1.878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its ambitious ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) project, protectionism and economic nationalism are on the rise in ASEAN. Protectionism, however, is not new to Southeast Asia, with governments across the region employ such an inward-looking economic policy when they enjoy economic stability, and pursue economic reform when confronted with major economic challenges. Unfortunately, embryonic industries will always exist in the region, and governments will find excuses to safeguard their existence. Consistent with the so-called 'Murdoch Schoold of critical political-economy' approach, this article mainly argues that the inclination towards protectionism in ASEDAN is primarily rooted in the domestic political-economy of ASEAN Member States. Apart from bringing about domestic regulatory changes, major economic liberalisationinitiatives of ASEAN, such as the ASEAN Free Trade Area and the AEC, significantly redistribute power and resources, and ignite struggles between competing domestic economic influences, many of which are in favour of government's protection. Whilst existing technical initiatives to address protectionism are useful, major crises that encourage major structural adjustments in all AMS might be needed to overcome fundamental protectionist inclination in the region","PeriodicalId":52561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ASEAN Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Economic Building Amidst Rising Protectionism and Economic Nationalism in ASEAN\",\"authors\":\"A. Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.21512/JAS.V4I1.878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite its ambitious ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) project, protectionism and economic nationalism are on the rise in ASEAN. Protectionism, however, is not new to Southeast Asia, with governments across the region employ such an inward-looking economic policy when they enjoy economic stability, and pursue economic reform when confronted with major economic challenges. Unfortunately, embryonic industries will always exist in the region, and governments will find excuses to safeguard their existence. Consistent with the so-called 'Murdoch Schoold of critical political-economy' approach, this article mainly argues that the inclination towards protectionism in ASEDAN is primarily rooted in the domestic political-economy of ASEAN Member States. Apart from bringing about domestic regulatory changes, major economic liberalisationinitiatives of ASEAN, such as the ASEAN Free Trade Area and the AEC, significantly redistribute power and resources, and ignite struggles between competing domestic economic influences, many of which are in favour of government's protection. Whilst existing technical initiatives to address protectionism are useful, major crises that encourage major structural adjustments in all AMS might be needed to overcome fundamental protectionist inclination in the region\",\"PeriodicalId\":52561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ASEAN Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ASEAN Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21512/JAS.V4I1.878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ASEAN Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/JAS.V4I1.878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

尽管东盟经济共同体(AEC)计划雄心勃勃,但东盟内部的保护主义和经济民族主义正在抬头。然而,保护主义在东南亚并不新鲜,该地区各国政府在经济稳定时采取这种内向型经济政策,在面临重大经济挑战时寻求经济改革。不幸的是,该地区的萌芽产业将永远存在,各国政府将找到借口来保护它们的存在。与所谓的“批判政治经济学的默多克学派”方法一致,本文主要认为,东盟的保护主义倾向主要源于东盟成员国的国内政治经济。除了带来国内监管变化外,东盟的主要经济自由化举措,如东盟自由贸易区和东盟经济共同体,显著地重新分配了权力和资源,并点燃了相互竞争的国内经济影响之间的斗争,其中许多都有利于政府的保护。虽然解决保护主义的现有技术倡议是有用的,但为了克服该区域的基本保护主义倾向,可能需要鼓励所有东南亚辅助贸易区进行重大结构调整的重大危机
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional Economic Building Amidst Rising Protectionism and Economic Nationalism in ASEAN
Despite its ambitious ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) project, protectionism and economic nationalism are on the rise in ASEAN. Protectionism, however, is not new to Southeast Asia, with governments across the region employ such an inward-looking economic policy when they enjoy economic stability, and pursue economic reform when confronted with major economic challenges. Unfortunately, embryonic industries will always exist in the region, and governments will find excuses to safeguard their existence. Consistent with the so-called 'Murdoch Schoold of critical political-economy' approach, this article mainly argues that the inclination towards protectionism in ASEDAN is primarily rooted in the domestic political-economy of ASEAN Member States. Apart from bringing about domestic regulatory changes, major economic liberalisationinitiatives of ASEAN, such as the ASEAN Free Trade Area and the AEC, significantly redistribute power and resources, and ignite struggles between competing domestic economic influences, many of which are in favour of government's protection. Whilst existing technical initiatives to address protectionism are useful, major crises that encourage major structural adjustments in all AMS might be needed to overcome fundamental protectionist inclination in the region
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of ASEAN Studies
Journal of ASEAN Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Characteristics of Indonesian Digital Diplomacy Indonesia’s Strategic Narrative on the New Dynamics of Great Power Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific A “Matter of Life and Death”? Patterns of Securitisation and Desecuritisation of Food Resilience in Indonesia Harmonizing Halal in ASEAN: Analysis of Halal Food Guidelines under the ASEAN Way Approach Tourism in ASEAN: A Catalyst for Regional Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1