十八世纪的石器时代

Q4 Arts and Humanities Sjuttonhundratal Pub Date : 2021-07-02 DOI:10.7557/4.5905
Liisa Kunnas-Pusa
{"title":"十八世纪的石器时代","authors":"Liisa Kunnas-Pusa","doi":"10.7557/4.5905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archaeological concepts of prehistory and the Stone Age are rooted in nineteenth-century scientific discoveries, which extended the human past much further back in time than was previously thought. Without this deep past, the disciplines of archaeology and history would not be what they are today. However, when the division of prehistory into the ages of stone, bronze, and iron was introduced in 1836, it was already an old idea. Stone Age artefacts and the initial phase of human history were discussed in the eighteenth-century academic world, even though the periodisation of history was constructed differently. In the philosophy of the Enlightenment several ideas surfaced which were essential to the formation of archaeology as a scientific practice, and which still affect the way the prehistoric past is imagined. This article examines the concept of a prehistoric, furthest past in Finnish scientific texts, within the framework of eighteenth-century Swedish traditions of science and historiography. How did the scholars in the Academy of Turku view Stone Age artefacts that had a multi-faceted nature in the antiquarian tradition? In what way did their visions of the earliest phase of the Nordic past set up later nationalistic narratives about prehistory?","PeriodicalId":37573,"journal":{"name":"Sjuttonhundratal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eighteenth-century visions of the Stone Age\",\"authors\":\"Liisa Kunnas-Pusa\",\"doi\":\"10.7557/4.5905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Archaeological concepts of prehistory and the Stone Age are rooted in nineteenth-century scientific discoveries, which extended the human past much further back in time than was previously thought. Without this deep past, the disciplines of archaeology and history would not be what they are today. However, when the division of prehistory into the ages of stone, bronze, and iron was introduced in 1836, it was already an old idea. Stone Age artefacts and the initial phase of human history were discussed in the eighteenth-century academic world, even though the periodisation of history was constructed differently. In the philosophy of the Enlightenment several ideas surfaced which were essential to the formation of archaeology as a scientific practice, and which still affect the way the prehistoric past is imagined. This article examines the concept of a prehistoric, furthest past in Finnish scientific texts, within the framework of eighteenth-century Swedish traditions of science and historiography. How did the scholars in the Academy of Turku view Stone Age artefacts that had a multi-faceted nature in the antiquarian tradition? In what way did their visions of the earliest phase of the Nordic past set up later nationalistic narratives about prehistory?\",\"PeriodicalId\":37573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sjuttonhundratal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sjuttonhundratal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7557/4.5905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sjuttonhundratal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/4.5905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

史前和石器时代的考古学概念根植于19世纪的科学发现,这些发现将人类的过去延伸到了比以前认为的更远的时间。如果没有这段深刻的过去,考古学和历史学的学科就不会是今天的样子。然而,当1836年将史前划分为石器时代、青铜时代和铁器时代时,这已经是一个古老的想法了。石器时代的文物和人类历史的初始阶段在18世纪的学术界得到了讨论,尽管历史的分期构建不同。在启蒙哲学中出现了一些思想,它们对考古学作为一门科学实践的形成至关重要,并且仍然影响着对史前过去的想象方式。本文考察了史前的概念,芬兰科学文本中最遥远的过去,在18世纪瑞典科学和史学传统的框架内。图尔库学院的学者们如何看待石器时代的文物,这些文物在古物学家的传统中具有多面性?他们对北欧历史最早阶段的看法是如何建立起后来关于史前的民族主义叙述的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eighteenth-century visions of the Stone Age
Archaeological concepts of prehistory and the Stone Age are rooted in nineteenth-century scientific discoveries, which extended the human past much further back in time than was previously thought. Without this deep past, the disciplines of archaeology and history would not be what they are today. However, when the division of prehistory into the ages of stone, bronze, and iron was introduced in 1836, it was already an old idea. Stone Age artefacts and the initial phase of human history were discussed in the eighteenth-century academic world, even though the periodisation of history was constructed differently. In the philosophy of the Enlightenment several ideas surfaced which were essential to the formation of archaeology as a scientific practice, and which still affect the way the prehistoric past is imagined. This article examines the concept of a prehistoric, furthest past in Finnish scientific texts, within the framework of eighteenth-century Swedish traditions of science and historiography. How did the scholars in the Academy of Turku view Stone Age artefacts that had a multi-faceted nature in the antiquarian tradition? In what way did their visions of the earliest phase of the Nordic past set up later nationalistic narratives about prehistory?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sjuttonhundratal
Sjuttonhundratal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: 1700-tal: Nordic Yearbook for Eighteenth-Century Studies is an international, multidisciplinary, peer reviewed, open access scholarly journal published by the Swedish Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies in cooperation with the Finnish Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (since 2009), the Norwegian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (since 2010), the Danish Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (since 2013), and the Icelandic Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies (since 2013). 1700-tal welcomes contributions on all aspects of the long eighteenth century written in Scandinavian languages or in English, French or German. Detailed guidelines for authors can be found on the website of the Swedish Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies. In the case of contributions in English and French, the authorial guidelines of Voltaire Foundations are used as the model. For further information on technicalities kindly consult the webpage of the printed yearbook or contact one of the editors.
期刊最新文献
Anita Wiklund Norli & Anne Svånaug Blengsdalen (red.),Greven og hans undersåtter. Makt og avmakt gjennom 150 år (Novus forlag: Oslo, 2021). 313 s. Peter Henningsen, Stavnsbåndet, serien 100 Danmarkshistorier (Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 2020). 100 pp. Kristjana Vigdís Ingvadóttir, Þrautseigja og mikilvægi íslenskrar tungu [Perseverance and Importance of the Icelandic Language] (Reykjavík: Sögufélag, 2021). 320 pp. Lars Edgren, Stadens sociala ordning: Stånd och klass i Malmö under sjuttonhundratalet (Lund: Studia historica Lundensia 34, 2021). 216 s. När pandemin mötte 1700-talsforskningen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1