国际发展合作作为外交政策工具:2003年至2016年巴西技术合作的政治经济学

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1590/dados.2023.66.3.288
Laerte Apolinário Júnior
{"title":"国际发展合作作为外交政策工具:2003年至2016年巴西技术合作的政治经济学","authors":"Laerte Apolinário Júnior","doi":"10.1590/dados.2023.66.3.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Why would a country provide International Development Cooperation (IDC)? The aid literature identifies moral and humanitarian purposes, political-diplomatic objectives, and economic interests as the main reasons a country would have an IDC policy. This paper contributes to this debate through a case study of Brazil’s motivation to provide technical cooperation between 2003 and 2016, employing an innovative analytical framework for this case. Especially during Luis Inácio Lula da Silva’s government, Brazil’s official discourse emphasized its national cooperation’s solidarity characteristics. One may link this non-indifference tone to the moral and humanitarian principles of providing IDC. Notwithstanding, the South-South Cooperation (SSC) mutual benefits narrative indicates political and economic interests in its execution. This paper analyzes the Brazilian Technical Cooperation (TC) allocation patterns between 2003 and 2016. It explores whether (and which) political and economic considerations were significant determinants of Brazilian cooperation. On the one hand, trade exports, subsided loans, and political support in international institutions help explain the Brazilian Technical Cooperation allocation pattern during this period. On the other, Brazil prioritized less-developed countries with better democratic institutions in its TC policy.","PeriodicalId":51809,"journal":{"name":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Development Cooperation as a Foreign Policy Instrument: The Political Economy of Brazilian Technical Cooperation from 2003 to 2016\",\"authors\":\"Laerte Apolinário Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/dados.2023.66.3.288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Why would a country provide International Development Cooperation (IDC)? The aid literature identifies moral and humanitarian purposes, political-diplomatic objectives, and economic interests as the main reasons a country would have an IDC policy. This paper contributes to this debate through a case study of Brazil’s motivation to provide technical cooperation between 2003 and 2016, employing an innovative analytical framework for this case. Especially during Luis Inácio Lula da Silva’s government, Brazil’s official discourse emphasized its national cooperation’s solidarity characteristics. One may link this non-indifference tone to the moral and humanitarian principles of providing IDC. Notwithstanding, the South-South Cooperation (SSC) mutual benefits narrative indicates political and economic interests in its execution. This paper analyzes the Brazilian Technical Cooperation (TC) allocation patterns between 2003 and 2016. It explores whether (and which) political and economic considerations were significant determinants of Brazilian cooperation. On the one hand, trade exports, subsided loans, and political support in international institutions help explain the Brazilian Technical Cooperation allocation pattern during this period. On the other, Brazil prioritized less-developed countries with better democratic institutions in its TC policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2023.66.3.288\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2023.66.3.288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个国家为什么要提供国际发展合作?援助文献将道德和人道主义目的、政治外交目标和经济利益确定为一个国家制定国际数据中心政策的主要原因。本文通过对巴西在2003年至2016年间提供技术合作的动机进行案例研究,采用创新的分析框架,为这一辩论做出贡献。特别是在路易斯Inácio卢拉政府时期,巴西的官方话语强调其国家合作的团结特征。人们可以将这种非冷漠的语气与提供数据中心的道德和人道主义原则联系起来。尽管如此,南南合作(SSC)互利叙述表明了其执行中的政治和经济利益。本文分析了2003 - 2016年巴西技术合作分配模式。它探讨了政治和经济考虑是否(以及哪些)是巴西合作的重要决定因素。一方面,贸易出口、补贴贷款和国际机构的政治支持有助于解释这一时期巴西技术合作分配模式。另一方面,巴西在技术援助政策中优先考虑民主制度较好的欠发达国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International Development Cooperation as a Foreign Policy Instrument: The Political Economy of Brazilian Technical Cooperation from 2003 to 2016
ABSTRACT Why would a country provide International Development Cooperation (IDC)? The aid literature identifies moral and humanitarian purposes, political-diplomatic objectives, and economic interests as the main reasons a country would have an IDC policy. This paper contributes to this debate through a case study of Brazil’s motivation to provide technical cooperation between 2003 and 2016, employing an innovative analytical framework for this case. Especially during Luis Inácio Lula da Silva’s government, Brazil’s official discourse emphasized its national cooperation’s solidarity characteristics. One may link this non-indifference tone to the moral and humanitarian principles of providing IDC. Notwithstanding, the South-South Cooperation (SSC) mutual benefits narrative indicates political and economic interests in its execution. This paper analyzes the Brazilian Technical Cooperation (TC) allocation patterns between 2003 and 2016. It explores whether (and which) political and economic considerations were significant determinants of Brazilian cooperation. On the one hand, trade exports, subsided loans, and political support in international institutions help explain the Brazilian Technical Cooperation allocation pattern during this period. On the other, Brazil prioritized less-developed countries with better democratic institutions in its TC policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais
Dados-Revista De Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais is a quarterly publication of the Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro (IUPERJ) aiming at publishing original articles in the area of social sciences. IUPERJ is the social sciences research organ of the Universidade Candido Mendes - UCAM. Opinions and concepdados expressed in signed articles are exclusive responsibility of the authors. Published from 1966, the journal"s abbreviated title is Dados, the form that should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Bancada Feminina e o Aborto: Os Pronunciamentos das Mulheres na Câmara dos Deputados do Brasil e do Uruguai Distinções, Mediações Excludentes e Desigualdades: a Governança da Saúde Reprodutiva de “Cadastradas Difíceis” Preferências e Politização do Judiciário no Brasil Contemporâneo: Uma Análise de Casos de Combate à Corrupção Arranjo Federativo e Desigualdades em Saúde no Brasil e na Argentina Geo-Politizando los Espacios Intermedios del Sistema-Mundo: Semicentros y Semiperiferias, Geoestrategias de Subordinación y de Autonomía en América Latina y Europa Meridional tras la Guerra Fría
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1