评估大学生的学习策略:博洛尼亚大学进行的评估研究的初步结果

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies Pub Date : 2017-11-29 DOI:10.7358/ECPS-2017-016-LUPP
Elena Luppi, S. Benini
{"title":"评估大学生的学习策略:博洛尼亚大学进行的评估研究的初步结果","authors":"Elena Luppi, S. Benini","doi":"10.7358/ECPS-2017-016-LUPP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper moves from an educational evaluation research conducted in the on the Nursery Degree Programme of Bologna University. Starting from the analysis of transversal competences that are crucial for nurses and from the outcomes of a qualitative exploratory phase of the research, this contribution is focused on the assessment of students’ learning strategies, at the beginning and at the end of the degree programme. Such assessment has been conducted through the application of «Learning Strategies Questionnaire QSA», validated from Pellerey in 1996 to 168 students at the first and last year (160 students) of the Nursery Degree Programme. In the meanwhile the questionnaire has been proposed to almost 100 first year University students from other degree programmes and 390 Secondary School’s students. Thanks to this second and third sample, results could be compared with the standard group through which the questionnaire was validated in 1996 and with other students attending University and Secondary School nowadays. The results put into evidence a certain urgency in reflecting on learning strategies proficiency for students in the last 20 years: in fact the scores of University students now do not appear so far from the results of the students aged 15 in 1996.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"99-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valutare le strategie di apprendimento negli studenti universitari: primi risultati di una ricerca valutativa condotta all’Università di Bologna\",\"authors\":\"Elena Luppi, S. Benini\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/ECPS-2017-016-LUPP\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper moves from an educational evaluation research conducted in the on the Nursery Degree Programme of Bologna University. Starting from the analysis of transversal competences that are crucial for nurses and from the outcomes of a qualitative exploratory phase of the research, this contribution is focused on the assessment of students’ learning strategies, at the beginning and at the end of the degree programme. Such assessment has been conducted through the application of «Learning Strategies Questionnaire QSA», validated from Pellerey in 1996 to 168 students at the first and last year (160 students) of the Nursery Degree Programme. In the meanwhile the questionnaire has been proposed to almost 100 first year University students from other degree programmes and 390 Secondary School’s students. Thanks to this second and third sample, results could be compared with the standard group through which the questionnaire was validated in 1996 and with other students attending University and Secondary School nowadays. The results put into evidence a certain urgency in reflecting on learning strategies proficiency for students in the last 20 years: in fact the scores of University students now do not appear so far from the results of the students aged 15 in 1996.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"99-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2017-016-LUPP\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2017-016-LUPP","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文从博洛尼亚大学幼儿园学位课程的教育评价研究出发。从对护士至关重要的横向能力的分析开始,从研究的定性探索阶段的结果开始,这一贡献集中在学位课程开始和结束时对学生学习策略的评估上。这种评估是通过应用«学习策略问卷QSA»进行的,该问卷于1996年在Pellerey幼儿园学位课程的第一年和最后一年(160名学生)对168名学生进行了验证。与此同时,该问卷已向来自其他学位课程的近100名大学一年级学生和390名中学生提出。通过这第二个和第三个样本,可以将结果与1996年进行问卷验证的标准组以及现在在大学和中学就读的其他学生进行比较。研究结果表明,反思近20年来学生学习策略熟练程度的紧迫性:事实上,现在大学生的成绩与1996年15岁学生的成绩相差无几。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Valutare le strategie di apprendimento negli studenti universitari: primi risultati di una ricerca valutativa condotta all’Università di Bologna
This paper moves from an educational evaluation research conducted in the on the Nursery Degree Programme of Bologna University. Starting from the analysis of transversal competences that are crucial for nurses and from the outcomes of a qualitative exploratory phase of the research, this contribution is focused on the assessment of students’ learning strategies, at the beginning and at the end of the degree programme. Such assessment has been conducted through the application of «Learning Strategies Questionnaire QSA», validated from Pellerey in 1996 to 168 students at the first and last year (160 students) of the Nursery Degree Programme. In the meanwhile the questionnaire has been proposed to almost 100 first year University students from other degree programmes and 390 Secondary School’s students. Thanks to this second and third sample, results could be compared with the standard group through which the questionnaire was validated in 1996 and with other students attending University and Secondary School nowadays. The results put into evidence a certain urgency in reflecting on learning strategies proficiency for students in the last 20 years: in fact the scores of University students now do not appear so far from the results of the students aged 15 in 1996.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Darwin, la pandemia e il trionfo della «ignoranza credulona» o della «stupidità umana». Il caso Texas e la situazione italiana / Darwin, the Pandemic and the Triumph of «Gullible Ignorance» or of «Human Stupidity». The Case of Texas and the Italian Situation A Massive Open Online Course Designed to Support the Development of Virtual Mobility Transversal Skills: Preliminary Evaluation Results from European Participants. Misurare l’omonegatività: validazione italiana della Multidimensional Scale of Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Ci sono differenti predittori della lettura nelle lingue che hanno un’ortografia trasparente? Evidenze da uno studio longitudinale. Are There Any Differences between the Texts Written by Students Who Are Blind, Those Who Are Partially Sighted, and Those with Normal Vision?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1