《没有什么能让他们改变对医疗行业的看法》:托妮·莫里森家中的医疗虐待、监禁和治疗

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN MELUS Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI:10.1093/melus/mlab045
Patrick S. Allen
{"title":"《没有什么能让他们改变对医疗行业的看法》:托妮·莫里森家中的医疗虐待、监禁和治疗","authors":"Patrick S. Allen","doi":"10.1093/melus/mlab045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Toni Morrison’s Home (2012) takes up issues of (anti-)Blackness, eugenics, and the healing powers of communities of Black women. In the novel, Cee, the protagonist’s sister, is hired as a “helper” (explicitly not a “nurse”) for a white eugenicist. Cee is essentially incarcerated at the doctor’s home office, where she is reduced to a sort of living cadaver upon whom the doctor experiments, leaving her unable to bear children. Upon being rescued from the doctor, Cee is nurtured back to health by a community of lay Black women in the South. Morrison’s novel critiques a history of anti-Black racism in the medical field that has situated Black persons (especially Black women) as particularly susceptible to abuse, malpractice, and incomplete or nonexistent care. I situate my discussion of Home alongside an exploration of forced sterilizations of incarcerated Black and Latinx women in US corrections facilities to illustrate Morrison’s illumination of historical and ongoing racial injustices in the entangled US medical, legal, and military systems. This essay explores the modes by which communities of Black women practice an ethics of care for one another and collectively resist anti-Black biopolitical systems. In taking on the role of healers, the Black women in this novel deny white attempts at control over Black persons’ bodies, lives, and reproduction. Morrison’s novel instead presents a move toward Black liberation, care, and safety that sets the stage for thinking about contemporary health and legal issues—namely anti-Black racism and the disproportionality of negative outcomes for Black persons in US medical systems.","PeriodicalId":44959,"journal":{"name":"MELUS","volume":"35 1","pages":"138 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"”Nothing Made Them Change Their Minds about the Medical Industry”: Medical Abuse, Incarceration, and Healing in Toni Morrison’s Home\",\"authors\":\"Patrick S. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/melus/mlab045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Toni Morrison’s Home (2012) takes up issues of (anti-)Blackness, eugenics, and the healing powers of communities of Black women. In the novel, Cee, the protagonist’s sister, is hired as a “helper” (explicitly not a “nurse”) for a white eugenicist. Cee is essentially incarcerated at the doctor’s home office, where she is reduced to a sort of living cadaver upon whom the doctor experiments, leaving her unable to bear children. Upon being rescued from the doctor, Cee is nurtured back to health by a community of lay Black women in the South. Morrison’s novel critiques a history of anti-Black racism in the medical field that has situated Black persons (especially Black women) as particularly susceptible to abuse, malpractice, and incomplete or nonexistent care. I situate my discussion of Home alongside an exploration of forced sterilizations of incarcerated Black and Latinx women in US corrections facilities to illustrate Morrison’s illumination of historical and ongoing racial injustices in the entangled US medical, legal, and military systems. This essay explores the modes by which communities of Black women practice an ethics of care for one another and collectively resist anti-Black biopolitical systems. In taking on the role of healers, the Black women in this novel deny white attempts at control over Black persons’ bodies, lives, and reproduction. Morrison’s novel instead presents a move toward Black liberation, care, and safety that sets the stage for thinking about contemporary health and legal issues—namely anti-Black racism and the disproportionality of negative outcomes for Black persons in US medical systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MELUS\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MELUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlab045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlab045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:《托妮·莫里森的家》(2012)探讨了(反)黑人、优生学以及黑人女性群体的治愈能力等问题。在小说中,主人公的妹妹茜被雇为一位白人优生学家的“助手”(显然不是“护士”)。茜基本上被关在医生的家庭办公室里,在那里她被变成了一具活生生的尸体,医生在她身上做实验,让她无法生育。在从医生那里被救出来后,茜在南方一个非专业黑人妇女社区的照顾下恢复了健康。莫里森的小说批评了医疗领域的反黑人种族主义历史,这种历史使黑人(尤其是黑人妇女)特别容易受到虐待、医疗事故和不完整或不存在的护理。我把对《家园》的讨论与对美国监狱中被监禁的黑人和拉丁裔妇女强制绝育的探索放在一起,以说明莫里森对美国医疗、法律和军事体系中历史和持续的种族不公正的阐释。本文探讨了黑人妇女群体实践相互关怀的伦理,集体抵制反黑人生物政治制度的模式。在这部小说中,黑人女性扮演了治疗者的角色,她们否认白人试图控制黑人的身体、生活和生育。相反,莫里森的小说呈现了黑人解放、关怀和安全的趋势,为思考当代健康和法律问题奠定了基础——即反黑人的种族主义和黑人在美国医疗体系中所受到的不成比例的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
”Nothing Made Them Change Their Minds about the Medical Industry”: Medical Abuse, Incarceration, and Healing in Toni Morrison’s Home
Abstract:Toni Morrison’s Home (2012) takes up issues of (anti-)Blackness, eugenics, and the healing powers of communities of Black women. In the novel, Cee, the protagonist’s sister, is hired as a “helper” (explicitly not a “nurse”) for a white eugenicist. Cee is essentially incarcerated at the doctor’s home office, where she is reduced to a sort of living cadaver upon whom the doctor experiments, leaving her unable to bear children. Upon being rescued from the doctor, Cee is nurtured back to health by a community of lay Black women in the South. Morrison’s novel critiques a history of anti-Black racism in the medical field that has situated Black persons (especially Black women) as particularly susceptible to abuse, malpractice, and incomplete or nonexistent care. I situate my discussion of Home alongside an exploration of forced sterilizations of incarcerated Black and Latinx women in US corrections facilities to illustrate Morrison’s illumination of historical and ongoing racial injustices in the entangled US medical, legal, and military systems. This essay explores the modes by which communities of Black women practice an ethics of care for one another and collectively resist anti-Black biopolitical systems. In taking on the role of healers, the Black women in this novel deny white attempts at control over Black persons’ bodies, lives, and reproduction. Morrison’s novel instead presents a move toward Black liberation, care, and safety that sets the stage for thinking about contemporary health and legal issues—namely anti-Black racism and the disproportionality of negative outcomes for Black persons in US medical systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MELUS
MELUS LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Never Die Alone: Donald Goines, Black Iconicity, and Série Noire “He Hopes They Have Disappeared”: Necro-elasticity and the Tyranny of the Present in Helena María Viramontes’s “The Cariboo Cafe” Indian Removal and the Plantation South: Cherokee Present-Absence in Three Neo-Slave Narratives “A Poem Is a Gesture toward Home”: Formal Plurality and Black/Queer Critical Hope in Jericho Brown’s Duplex Form An Ocean of Becoming: Routed Motherhood in Lisa Ko’s The Leavers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1