Sabrina Brody-Camp, Jennifer Shehan, Rohith Kariveda, Jeffrey Spiegel
{"title":"在女性化颅骨成形术中适当使用术前成像。","authors":"Sabrina Brody-Camp, Jennifer Shehan, Rohith Kariveda, Jeffrey Spiegel","doi":"10.1177/19433875231175703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine if proceeding with feminization frontal cranioplasty without preoperative imaging adversely affected patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization at a single tertiary care center between 2013 and 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (JS), who operated at multiple sites. The site selected is where the majority of these procedures were performed during this time. Type of cranioplasty (I vs III) was recorded. Primary outcomes included postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, entering the cranium, or dural exposure or injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>422 subjects underwent cranioplasty for facial feminization between 2013 and 2019. No preoperative imaging was performed. Zero patients had CSF leak. 334 subjects (79%) had type III cranioplasty, while the remaining 88 subjects (21%) had type I cranioplasty. No subjects had documented episodes of dural injury, or postoperative brain or cranial concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization does not require routine preoperative imaging. The authors recommend preoperative imaging for patients with a history of congenital cranial abnormality, prior significant head trauma affecting the frontal bone, and in some cases where the patient has had prior surgery or a history of sinus disease or extensive polyposis. Routine preoperative computed tomography is therefore not indicated for patients undergoing feminizing cranioplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate Use of Preoperative Imaging in Feminization Cranioplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Brody-Camp, Jennifer Shehan, Rohith Kariveda, Jeffrey Spiegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19433875231175703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine if proceeding with feminization frontal cranioplasty without preoperative imaging adversely affected patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization at a single tertiary care center between 2013 and 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (JS), who operated at multiple sites. The site selected is where the majority of these procedures were performed during this time. Type of cranioplasty (I vs III) was recorded. Primary outcomes included postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, entering the cranium, or dural exposure or injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>422 subjects underwent cranioplasty for facial feminization between 2013 and 2019. No preoperative imaging was performed. Zero patients had CSF leak. 334 subjects (79%) had type III cranioplasty, while the remaining 88 subjects (21%) had type I cranioplasty. No subjects had documented episodes of dural injury, or postoperative brain or cranial concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization does not require routine preoperative imaging. The authors recommend preoperative imaging for patients with a history of congenital cranial abnormality, prior significant head trauma affecting the frontal bone, and in some cases where the patient has had prior surgery or a history of sinus disease or extensive polyposis. Routine preoperative computed tomography is therefore not indicated for patients undergoing feminizing cranioplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875231175703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875231175703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计回顾性病历审查:本研究的目的是确定在没有术前成像的情况下进行女性化额颅成形术是否会对患者的预后产生不利影响:本研究回顾性分析了2013年至2019年间在一家三级医疗中心接受额颅成形术进行面部女性化手术的所有患者。所有手术均由一名外科医生(JS)在多个地点进行。所选地点是在此期间进行这些手术的大部分地点。记录了颅骨成形术的类型(I vs III)。主要结果包括术后脑脊液(CSF)漏、进入颅内、硬脑膜暴露或损伤:2013年至2019年期间,422名受试者因面部女性化接受了颅骨成形术。术前未进行影像学检查。零名患者出现 CSF 渗漏。334名受试者(79%)接受了III型开颅整形术,其余88名受试者(21%)接受了I型开颅整形术。没有受试者出现硬脑膜损伤、术后脑部或颅骨问题:这项研究表明,额颅成形术治疗面部女性化并不需要常规的术前成像。作者建议,对于有先天性颅骨畸形病史、曾有影响额骨的重大头部创伤的患者,以及一些曾做过手术或有鼻窦疾病或广泛息肉病史的患者,应进行术前造影。因此,常规术前计算机断层扫描不适用于接受女性化颅成形术的患者。
Appropriate Use of Preoperative Imaging in Feminization Cranioplasty.
Study design: Retrospective chart review.
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if proceeding with feminization frontal cranioplasty without preoperative imaging adversely affected patient outcomes.
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization at a single tertiary care center between 2013 and 2019. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (JS), who operated at multiple sites. The site selected is where the majority of these procedures were performed during this time. Type of cranioplasty (I vs III) was recorded. Primary outcomes included postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, entering the cranium, or dural exposure or injury.
Results: 422 subjects underwent cranioplasty for facial feminization between 2013 and 2019. No preoperative imaging was performed. Zero patients had CSF leak. 334 subjects (79%) had type III cranioplasty, while the remaining 88 subjects (21%) had type I cranioplasty. No subjects had documented episodes of dural injury, or postoperative brain or cranial concerns.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that frontal cranioplasty for facial feminization does not require routine preoperative imaging. The authors recommend preoperative imaging for patients with a history of congenital cranial abnormality, prior significant head trauma affecting the frontal bone, and in some cases where the patient has had prior surgery or a history of sinus disease or extensive polyposis. Routine preoperative computed tomography is therefore not indicated for patients undergoing feminizing cranioplasty.