在Covid-19大流行期间,使用混合和虚拟施瓦茨中心轮次®为爱尔兰的产科人员提供支持

Jean Doherty, Clara K Devine, S. Cullen
{"title":"在Covid-19大流行期间,使用混合和虚拟施瓦茨中心轮次®为爱尔兰的产科人员提供支持","authors":"Jean Doherty, Clara K Devine, S. Cullen","doi":"10.30994/jnp.v5i1.160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many staff supports, such as the internationally accredited Schwartz Center Rounds were suspended worldwide during the Covid-19 restrictions, at a time when they were most needed. Schwartz Rounds are multi-disciplinary forums where staff can discuss the emotional, social and ethical challenges of care in a confidential and safe environment, intending to improve staff well-being and patient care. In a bid to improve staff support after the suspension of full Schwartz Rounds, virtual, then blended (limited spaces for socially distanced in-person attendance and virtual access) Rounds were initiated.Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate Schwartz Rounds in a maternity setting in Ireland and compare full-in person Rounds with virtual and blended Rounds.Methods: Standard Schwartz Rounds evaluation forms were completed by Rounds attendees. Data were analysed using SPSS (Version 24). Respondents were invited to include a comment at the end of the form, and these free-text comments were analysed thematically.Results: Six Rounds were evaluated (2 full in-person Rounds attended before the pandemic, 1 virtual, 3 blended) and a total of 115 evaluation forms were completed. The Rounds were rated extremely high. Some, but not all aspects of the Rounds were rated more positively from the full in-person Rounds. Some technical difficulties were a barrier to fully experiencing the Round when attending remotely.Conclusion: Schwartz Rounds are attended by staff in over 560 healthcare organisations, internationally and have been reported to improve staff well-being and teamwork. The pandemic saw Schwartz Rounds being suspended in most organisations due to social distancing guidelines. Virtual and blended Rounds are recommended as an effective replacement for full Schwartz Rounds while social distancing and infection control measures are in place. However, in order to improve post-panellist discussion and gain the full Schwartz Round experience, recommencement of full, in-person Rounds are recommended as soon as public health measures allow","PeriodicalId":33236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Blended and Virtual Schwartz Center Rounds® to Support Maternity Staff in Ireland During the Covid-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Jean Doherty, Clara K Devine, S. Cullen\",\"doi\":\"10.30994/jnp.v5i1.160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Many staff supports, such as the internationally accredited Schwartz Center Rounds were suspended worldwide during the Covid-19 restrictions, at a time when they were most needed. Schwartz Rounds are multi-disciplinary forums where staff can discuss the emotional, social and ethical challenges of care in a confidential and safe environment, intending to improve staff well-being and patient care. In a bid to improve staff support after the suspension of full Schwartz Rounds, virtual, then blended (limited spaces for socially distanced in-person attendance and virtual access) Rounds were initiated.Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate Schwartz Rounds in a maternity setting in Ireland and compare full-in person Rounds with virtual and blended Rounds.Methods: Standard Schwartz Rounds evaluation forms were completed by Rounds attendees. Data were analysed using SPSS (Version 24). Respondents were invited to include a comment at the end of the form, and these free-text comments were analysed thematically.Results: Six Rounds were evaluated (2 full in-person Rounds attended before the pandemic, 1 virtual, 3 blended) and a total of 115 evaluation forms were completed. The Rounds were rated extremely high. Some, but not all aspects of the Rounds were rated more positively from the full in-person Rounds. Some technical difficulties were a barrier to fully experiencing the Round when attending remotely.Conclusion: Schwartz Rounds are attended by staff in over 560 healthcare organisations, internationally and have been reported to improve staff well-being and teamwork. The pandemic saw Schwartz Rounds being suspended in most organisations due to social distancing guidelines. Virtual and blended Rounds are recommended as an effective replacement for full Schwartz Rounds while social distancing and infection control measures are in place. However, in order to improve post-panellist discussion and gain the full Schwartz Round experience, recommencement of full, in-person Rounds are recommended as soon as public health measures allow\",\"PeriodicalId\":33236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v5i1.160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v5i1.160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在Covid-19限制期间,许多工作人员的支持,如国际认可的施瓦茨中心巡诊,在全球最需要的时候被暂停。Schwartz round是多学科论坛,员工可以在保密和安全的环境中讨论护理的情感,社会和道德挑战,旨在改善员工福祉和患者护理。在全面的施瓦茨轮岗暂停后,为了改善工作人员的支持,开始了虚拟轮岗,然后是混合轮岗(为社交距离远的人出席和虚拟访问提供有限的空间)。目的:本研究旨在评估爱尔兰产妇环境中的施瓦茨回合,并将真人回合与虚拟回合和混合回合进行比较。方法:标准施瓦茨回合评估表由回合参与者填写。数据分析使用SPSS (Version 24)。受访者被邀请在表格的末尾附上评论,这些自由文本评论被按主题分析。结果:进行了6轮评估(大流行前2轮亲自参加,1轮虚拟,3轮混合),共完成了115份评估表。这些回合的评分非常高。在一些方面,但不是所有方面,面对面的轮转都得到了更积极的评价。一些技术上的困难是远程参加谈判时无法充分体验的障碍。结论:全球560多个医疗机构的工作人员参加了施瓦茨轮岗,据报道,该轮岗改善了工作人员的福祉和团队合作。由于保持社交距离的指导方针,大多数组织暂停了施瓦茨回合。在保持社交距离和感染控制措施到位的情况下,建议使用虚拟轮毂和混合轮毂作为完整的施瓦茨轮毂的有效替代品。然而,为了改善小组讨论后的讨论并获得全面的施瓦茨回合经验,建议在公共卫生措施允许的情况下尽快重新开始全面的面对面查房
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Blended and Virtual Schwartz Center Rounds® to Support Maternity Staff in Ireland During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Background: Many staff supports, such as the internationally accredited Schwartz Center Rounds were suspended worldwide during the Covid-19 restrictions, at a time when they were most needed. Schwartz Rounds are multi-disciplinary forums where staff can discuss the emotional, social and ethical challenges of care in a confidential and safe environment, intending to improve staff well-being and patient care. In a bid to improve staff support after the suspension of full Schwartz Rounds, virtual, then blended (limited spaces for socially distanced in-person attendance and virtual access) Rounds were initiated.Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate Schwartz Rounds in a maternity setting in Ireland and compare full-in person Rounds with virtual and blended Rounds.Methods: Standard Schwartz Rounds evaluation forms were completed by Rounds attendees. Data were analysed using SPSS (Version 24). Respondents were invited to include a comment at the end of the form, and these free-text comments were analysed thematically.Results: Six Rounds were evaluated (2 full in-person Rounds attended before the pandemic, 1 virtual, 3 blended) and a total of 115 evaluation forms were completed. The Rounds were rated extremely high. Some, but not all aspects of the Rounds were rated more positively from the full in-person Rounds. Some technical difficulties were a barrier to fully experiencing the Round when attending remotely.Conclusion: Schwartz Rounds are attended by staff in over 560 healthcare organisations, internationally and have been reported to improve staff well-being and teamwork. The pandemic saw Schwartz Rounds being suspended in most organisations due to social distancing guidelines. Virtual and blended Rounds are recommended as an effective replacement for full Schwartz Rounds while social distancing and infection control measures are in place. However, in order to improve post-panellist discussion and gain the full Schwartz Round experience, recommencement of full, in-person Rounds are recommended as soon as public health measures allow
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acupressure for Pain of Osteoarthritis : A Systematic Review Effleurage Massage using Rose Essential Oil in Reducing the Intensity of Dysmenorrhea Pain in Adolescent Girls Hospital Staffing, Communication and Management on Patient Safety Rating at Dr. Iskak Hospital Tulungagung The Role of Midwives in the Education of Labor and Childbirth Readiness Development of Communication Models Mother-Daughter-Dyads about Sex Education in Prevention of Teenage Pregnancy Research and Development (R&D)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1