学校入学语音意识能力的计算机管理与纸本评估

K. Carson, G. Gillon, T. Boustead
{"title":"学校入学语音意识能力的计算机管理与纸本评估","authors":"K. Carson, G. Gillon, T. Boustead","doi":"10.1179/136132811805334876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: Phonological awareness (PA) ability at school entry is a powerful predictor of early literacy success. Equipping classroom teachers with tools to accurately and efficiently monitor young children's PA development to help inform reading and writing instruction is critical for raising literacy achievement for all children. Computer-based assessment (CBA) is one conduit through which time-efficient monitoring of PA can be achieved within busy curricular environments. This study investigated whether computer-based administration of PA test content could generate equivalent results to paper-based administration with an examiner. Methods: Thirty-three children aged between 4 years, 10 months and 5 years, 0 months participated in the study. Twenty-one children presented with typical speech and language development and 12 children presented with moderate-severe speech delay. A crossover research design was used whereby participants were allocated to one of two experimental assessment conditions. Group A received a paper-based assessment of their PA skills whereas Group B received the same assessment content delivered by a computer program that could be self-administered. Two weeks later the participants were re-assessed using the opposite assessment modality. Results: Data analysis showed that: (a) CBA generated comparable scores to the paper-based counterpart for both children with typical spoken language development and children with moderate-severe speech delay, (b) CBA took 20% less time to administer, (c) there were no gender differences in performance between CBA and paper-based administrations, and (d) CBA scores showed strong evidence of reliability and concurrent validity with an existing paper-based phonological awareness measure. Implications: The findings indicate that CBA can generate comparable results and in a shorter time period when compared to more traditional paper-based methods of measuring PA ability. Potential implications of introducing CBA as a universal screening and monitoring tool on the literacy outcomes of school-aged children are discussed.","PeriodicalId":88385,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","volume":"21 1","pages":"101 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-Administrated Versus Paper-Based Assessment of School-Entry Phonological Awareness Ability\",\"authors\":\"K. Carson, G. Gillon, T. Boustead\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/136132811805334876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose: Phonological awareness (PA) ability at school entry is a powerful predictor of early literacy success. Equipping classroom teachers with tools to accurately and efficiently monitor young children's PA development to help inform reading and writing instruction is critical for raising literacy achievement for all children. Computer-based assessment (CBA) is one conduit through which time-efficient monitoring of PA can be achieved within busy curricular environments. This study investigated whether computer-based administration of PA test content could generate equivalent results to paper-based administration with an examiner. Methods: Thirty-three children aged between 4 years, 10 months and 5 years, 0 months participated in the study. Twenty-one children presented with typical speech and language development and 12 children presented with moderate-severe speech delay. A crossover research design was used whereby participants were allocated to one of two experimental assessment conditions. Group A received a paper-based assessment of their PA skills whereas Group B received the same assessment content delivered by a computer program that could be self-administered. Two weeks later the participants were re-assessed using the opposite assessment modality. Results: Data analysis showed that: (a) CBA generated comparable scores to the paper-based counterpart for both children with typical spoken language development and children with moderate-severe speech delay, (b) CBA took 20% less time to administer, (c) there were no gender differences in performance between CBA and paper-based administrations, and (d) CBA scores showed strong evidence of reliability and concurrent validity with an existing paper-based phonological awareness measure. Implications: The findings indicate that CBA can generate comparable results and in a shorter time period when compared to more traditional paper-based methods of measuring PA ability. Potential implications of introducing CBA as a universal screening and monitoring tool on the literacy outcomes of school-aged children are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/136132811805334876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of speech, language, and hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/136132811805334876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

摘要目的:入学时语音意识(PA)能力是早期读写能力成功的有力预测因子。为课堂教师配备工具,以准确有效地监测幼儿的读写能力发展,从而为阅读和写作指导提供信息,这对于提高所有儿童的读写能力成就至关重要。基于计算机的评估(CBA)是一个管道,通过它可以在繁忙的课程环境中实现高效的PA监测。本研究调查了基于计算机的PA测试内容管理是否可以产生与考官基于纸张的管理相同的结果。方法:33例4岁10个月~ 5岁0个月的儿童参与研究。21例患儿表现为典型的言语和语言发育,12例患儿表现为中重度言语迟缓。采用交叉研究设计,参与者被分配到两个实验评估条件之一。A组接受了基于纸张的PA技能评估,而B组接受了由计算机程序提供的相同评估内容,该程序可以自我管理。两周后,使用相反的评估方式对参与者进行重新评估。结果:数据分析表明:(a) CBA对典型口语发育儿童和中重度言语延迟儿童产生的分数与基于纸张的分数相当,(b) CBA管理的时间减少了20%,(c) CBA和基于纸张的管理在表现上没有性别差异,(d) CBA分数与现有的基于纸张的语音意识测量具有很强的可靠性和同步效度。意义:研究结果表明,与传统的基于纸张的测量PA能力的方法相比,CBA可以在更短的时间内产生可比的结果。本文讨论了引入CBA作为对学龄儿童扫盲结果的普遍筛查和监测工具的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computer-Administrated Versus Paper-Based Assessment of School-Entry Phonological Awareness Ability
Abstract Purpose: Phonological awareness (PA) ability at school entry is a powerful predictor of early literacy success. Equipping classroom teachers with tools to accurately and efficiently monitor young children's PA development to help inform reading and writing instruction is critical for raising literacy achievement for all children. Computer-based assessment (CBA) is one conduit through which time-efficient monitoring of PA can be achieved within busy curricular environments. This study investigated whether computer-based administration of PA test content could generate equivalent results to paper-based administration with an examiner. Methods: Thirty-three children aged between 4 years, 10 months and 5 years, 0 months participated in the study. Twenty-one children presented with typical speech and language development and 12 children presented with moderate-severe speech delay. A crossover research design was used whereby participants were allocated to one of two experimental assessment conditions. Group A received a paper-based assessment of their PA skills whereas Group B received the same assessment content delivered by a computer program that could be self-administered. Two weeks later the participants were re-assessed using the opposite assessment modality. Results: Data analysis showed that: (a) CBA generated comparable scores to the paper-based counterpart for both children with typical spoken language development and children with moderate-severe speech delay, (b) CBA took 20% less time to administer, (c) there were no gender differences in performance between CBA and paper-based administrations, and (d) CBA scores showed strong evidence of reliability and concurrent validity with an existing paper-based phonological awareness measure. Implications: The findings indicate that CBA can generate comparable results and in a shorter time period when compared to more traditional paper-based methods of measuring PA ability. Potential implications of introducing CBA as a universal screening and monitoring tool on the literacy outcomes of school-aged children are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presence of Stop Bursts and Multiple Bursts in Younger and Older Adults Effects of Memory Aids on the Conversations of Elderly Chinese Persons Subject Index: Volume 15, Numbers 1–4 Explicit Phonological Knowledge of Educational Professionals Author Index: Volume 15, Numbers 1–4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1