芬太尼与布托啡诺术后镇痛与静脉自控镇痛的比较

Bhoomika Thakore, Jacqueline D’Mello, Shalini Saksena, Manju Butani
{"title":"芬太尼与布托啡诺术后镇痛与静脉自控镇痛的比较","authors":"Bhoomika Thakore,&nbsp;Jacqueline D’Mello,&nbsp;Shalini Saksena,&nbsp;Manju Butani","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Opioids are very effective as postoperative analgesics, influencing emotional aspects of pain as well as reducing the actual pain threshold. Fentanyl, a phenylpiperidine derivative and potent opioid agonist, has already been studied for postoperative analgesia. Butorphanol, a synthetic morphinan derivative – agonist–antagonist, has few studies to substantiate its use. The present study was undertaken to compare the effects of the two drugs on postoperative pain relief in terms of efficacy and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, randomized controlled study of 100 patients [ASA I and II] undergoing total abdominal hysterectomies was conducted. Group F of 50 patients received fentanyl [0.4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h] and group B received butorphanol [4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h] as postoperative pain treatment via intravenous patient controlled analgesia [i.v. PCA]. Parameters monitored were pain score [VAS], pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, sedation score and side effects. The infusion rate, number of boluses, PCA demands and requirement of rescue analgesia were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Butorphanol had a better maintenance phase than fentanyl. The VAS scores were found to be reduced in the butorphanol group when compared with fentanyl group, significantly at 8<!--> <!-->h [F: 1.16<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.037; B: 0.78<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.582; <em>p</em>-value: 0.026]. The incidences of complications were comparable in both the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both the drugs are equally effective and safe as postoperative analgesics with i.v. PCA. The dose of 4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h of butorphanol appeared effective but the dosage of fentanyl used, 0.4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h, was not as effective as evidenced by the increased number of boluses taken by patients and needs to be increased.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fentanyl and butorphanol for postoperative pain relief with intravenous patient controlled analgesia\",\"authors\":\"Bhoomika Thakore,&nbsp;Jacqueline D’Mello,&nbsp;Shalini Saksena,&nbsp;Manju Butani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Opioids are very effective as postoperative analgesics, influencing emotional aspects of pain as well as reducing the actual pain threshold. Fentanyl, a phenylpiperidine derivative and potent opioid agonist, has already been studied for postoperative analgesia. Butorphanol, a synthetic morphinan derivative – agonist–antagonist, has few studies to substantiate its use. The present study was undertaken to compare the effects of the two drugs on postoperative pain relief in terms of efficacy and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, randomized controlled study of 100 patients [ASA I and II] undergoing total abdominal hysterectomies was conducted. Group F of 50 patients received fentanyl [0.4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h] and group B received butorphanol [4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h] as postoperative pain treatment via intravenous patient controlled analgesia [i.v. PCA]. Parameters monitored were pain score [VAS], pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, sedation score and side effects. The infusion rate, number of boluses, PCA demands and requirement of rescue analgesia were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Butorphanol had a better maintenance phase than fentanyl. The VAS scores were found to be reduced in the butorphanol group when compared with fentanyl group, significantly at 8<!--> <!-->h [F: 1.16<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.037; B: 0.78<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.582; <em>p</em>-value: 0.026]. The incidences of complications were comparable in both the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both the drugs are equally effective and safe as postoperative analgesics with i.v. PCA. The dose of 4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h of butorphanol appeared effective but the dosage of fentanyl used, 0.4<!--> <!-->μg/kg/h, was not as effective as evidenced by the increased number of boluses taken by patients and needs to be increased.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Pain\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136600710900045X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136600710900045X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

阿片类药物是非常有效的术后镇痛药,影响疼痛的情绪方面,并降低实际痛阈。芬太尼,苯哌啶衍生物和强效阿片激动剂,已被研究用于术后镇痛。布托啡诺是一种合成的吗啡酮衍生物-激动剂-拮抗剂,很少有研究证实其用途。本研究旨在比较两种药物在术后疼痛缓解方面的疗效和安全性。方法对100例腹式全子宫切除术患者进行前瞻性、随机对照研究。F组50例患者术后给予芬太尼(0.4 μg/kg/h)治疗,B组给予布托啡诺(4 μg/kg/h)静脉自控镇痛。主成分分析)。监测疼痛评分(VAS)、脉搏、血压、呼吸频率、镇静评分及副作用。记录输注速率、剂量、PCA要求及抢救镇痛要求。结果布托啡诺维持期优于芬太尼。布托啡诺组VAS评分较芬太尼组降低,8 h时显著降低[F: 1.16±1.037;B: 0.78±0.582;假定值:0.026)。两组的并发症发生率具有可比性。结论两种药物与静脉注射PCA术后镇痛药具有相同的疗效和安全性。丁托啡诺4 μg/kg/h的剂量有效,而芬太尼0.4 μg/kg/h的剂量效果不如患者服用剂量的增加,需要增加剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of fentanyl and butorphanol for postoperative pain relief with intravenous patient controlled analgesia

Background

Opioids are very effective as postoperative analgesics, influencing emotional aspects of pain as well as reducing the actual pain threshold. Fentanyl, a phenylpiperidine derivative and potent opioid agonist, has already been studied for postoperative analgesia. Butorphanol, a synthetic morphinan derivative – agonist–antagonist, has few studies to substantiate its use. The present study was undertaken to compare the effects of the two drugs on postoperative pain relief in terms of efficacy and safety.

Methods

A prospective, randomized controlled study of 100 patients [ASA I and II] undergoing total abdominal hysterectomies was conducted. Group F of 50 patients received fentanyl [0.4 μg/kg/h] and group B received butorphanol [4 μg/kg/h] as postoperative pain treatment via intravenous patient controlled analgesia [i.v. PCA]. Parameters monitored were pain score [VAS], pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, sedation score and side effects. The infusion rate, number of boluses, PCA demands and requirement of rescue analgesia were noted.

Results

Butorphanol had a better maintenance phase than fentanyl. The VAS scores were found to be reduced in the butorphanol group when compared with fentanyl group, significantly at 8 h [F: 1.16 ± 1.037; B: 0.78 ± 0.582; p-value: 0.026]. The incidences of complications were comparable in both the groups.

Conclusion

Both the drugs are equally effective and safe as postoperative analgesics with i.v. PCA. The dose of 4 μg/kg/h of butorphanol appeared effective but the dosage of fentanyl used, 0.4 μg/kg/h, was not as effective as evidenced by the increased number of boluses taken by patients and needs to be increased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Editorial Board Announcement Anaesthesiologist-associated risk factors for inadequate postoperative pain management Continuing use of droperidol in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1