研究与政治现实:未来二十年酒精领域的行为主义者将面临什么

G Alan Marlatt
{"title":"研究与政治现实:未来二十年酒精领域的行为主义者将面临什么","authors":"G Alan Marlatt","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(87)90013-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contemporary political realities are addressed in terms of implications for future research in behavioral approaches to alcohol problems. Increased funding trends for addiction research and recommendations for establishing a National Institute on Addiction are reviewed. Evaluation of treatment effectiveness will become the criterion for future program funding rather than treatment philosophy or traditional beliefs about alcoholism. Cost-effective considerations will promote the need for early intervention and minimal intervention programs. Turning to the topic of controlled drinking, controversy over the use of this term (or related terms such as “responsible drinking”) is discussed. It is recommended that we replace these terms with the more acceptable label of <em>moderation training</em>. Use of moderation training as a secondary prevention approach with high-risk drinkers is outlined, along with criteria for selecting treatment goals of moderation or abstinence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(87)90013-0","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research and political realities: What the next twenty years hold for behaviorists in the alcohol field\",\"authors\":\"G Alan Marlatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(87)90013-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Contemporary political realities are addressed in terms of implications for future research in behavioral approaches to alcohol problems. Increased funding trends for addiction research and recommendations for establishing a National Institute on Addiction are reviewed. Evaluation of treatment effectiveness will become the criterion for future program funding rather than treatment philosophy or traditional beliefs about alcoholism. Cost-effective considerations will promote the need for early intervention and minimal intervention programs. Turning to the topic of controlled drinking, controversy over the use of this term (or related terms such as “responsible drinking”) is discussed. It is recommended that we replace these terms with the more acceptable label of <em>moderation training</em>. Use of moderation training as a secondary prevention approach with high-risk drinkers is outlined, along with criteria for selecting treatment goals of moderation or abstinence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 165-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(87)90013-0\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640287900130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640287900130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当代的政治现实是在对酒精问题的行为方法的未来研究的影响方面解决。审查了成瘾研究经费增加的趋势和建立国家成瘾研究所的建议。治疗效果的评估将成为未来项目资助的标准,而不是治疗哲学或关于酗酒的传统观念。考虑成本效益将促进早期干预和最小干预方案的需要。转向控制饮酒的话题,讨论了关于使用这个术语(或相关术语,如“负责任的饮酒”)的争议。建议我们将这些术语替换为更容易接受的适度培训标签。使用适度训练作为二级预防方法与高危饮酒者概述,以及标准选择适度或戒酒的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research and political realities: What the next twenty years hold for behaviorists in the alcohol field

Contemporary political realities are addressed in terms of implications for future research in behavioral approaches to alcohol problems. Increased funding trends for addiction research and recommendations for establishing a National Institute on Addiction are reviewed. Evaluation of treatment effectiveness will become the criterion for future program funding rather than treatment philosophy or traditional beliefs about alcoholism. Cost-effective considerations will promote the need for early intervention and minimal intervention programs. Turning to the topic of controlled drinking, controversy over the use of this term (or related terms such as “responsible drinking”) is discussed. It is recommended that we replace these terms with the more acceptable label of moderation training. Use of moderation training as a secondary prevention approach with high-risk drinkers is outlined, along with criteria for selecting treatment goals of moderation or abstinence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cancer, personality and stress: Prediction and prevention Adolescent family predictors of substance use during early adulthood: A theoretical model Fears in mental retardation: Part one—Types of fears reported by men and women with and without mental retardation UCS-inflation and acquired fear responses in human conditioning Behavioral treatment of obesity: thirty years and counting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1