Michael K. Schmit, Erika L. Schmit, A. Lenz, Joshua Hawkins, Sarah A. Silveus, Candace Chuyou-Campbell
{"title":"行为夫妻治疗提高戒断物质使用和关系调整的meta分析","authors":"Michael K. Schmit, Erika L. Schmit, A. Lenz, Joshua Hawkins, Sarah A. Silveus, Candace Chuyou-Campbell","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) on increasing abstinence from substance use and relationship adjustment when compared to alternative treatments. Using meta-analytic procedures, we synthesized 17 randomized, between-group studies representing the data of 2,307 participants (1,304 identified users and 1,003 partners). Abstinence from substance use was measured using the Timeline Followback Interview, while relationship adjustment was measured using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test, the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, or the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire. Separate random-effects meta-analyses revealed small effects sizes in favor of BCT on abstinence from substance use (g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]) and relationship adjustment (g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54]). Independent random-effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and influential moderating variables on treatment outcomes. Counselors should exercise caution when adopting a BCT approach for couples with substance use and relationship adjustment issues, and consider how alternative treatment methods may be just as effective.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"7 1","pages":"57 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Couples Therapy for Increasing Abstinence From Substance Use and Relationship Adjustment\",\"authors\":\"Michael K. Schmit, Erika L. Schmit, A. Lenz, Joshua Hawkins, Sarah A. Silveus, Candace Chuyou-Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) on increasing abstinence from substance use and relationship adjustment when compared to alternative treatments. Using meta-analytic procedures, we synthesized 17 randomized, between-group studies representing the data of 2,307 participants (1,304 identified users and 1,003 partners). Abstinence from substance use was measured using the Timeline Followback Interview, while relationship adjustment was measured using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test, the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, or the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire. Separate random-effects meta-analyses revealed small effects sizes in favor of BCT on abstinence from substance use (g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]) and relationship adjustment (g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54]). Independent random-effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and influential moderating variables on treatment outcomes. Counselors should exercise caution when adopting a BCT approach for couples with substance use and relationship adjustment issues, and consider how alternative treatment methods may be just as effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Couples Therapy for Increasing Abstinence From Substance Use and Relationship Adjustment
Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) on increasing abstinence from substance use and relationship adjustment when compared to alternative treatments. Using meta-analytic procedures, we synthesized 17 randomized, between-group studies representing the data of 2,307 participants (1,304 identified users and 1,003 partners). Abstinence from substance use was measured using the Timeline Followback Interview, while relationship adjustment was measured using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test, the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, or the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire. Separate random-effects meta-analyses revealed small effects sizes in favor of BCT on abstinence from substance use (g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]) and relationship adjustment (g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54]). Independent random-effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and influential moderating variables on treatment outcomes. Counselors should exercise caution when adopting a BCT approach for couples with substance use and relationship adjustment issues, and consider how alternative treatment methods may be just as effective.
期刊介绍:
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.