行为夫妻治疗提高戒断物质使用和关系调整的meta分析

Michael K. Schmit, Erika L. Schmit, A. Lenz, Joshua Hawkins, Sarah A. Silveus, Candace Chuyou-Campbell
{"title":"行为夫妻治疗提高戒断物质使用和关系调整的meta分析","authors":"Michael K. Schmit, Erika L. Schmit, A. Lenz, Joshua Hawkins, Sarah A. Silveus, Candace Chuyou-Campbell","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) on increasing abstinence from substance use and relationship adjustment when compared to alternative treatments. Using meta-analytic procedures, we synthesized 17 randomized, between-group studies representing the data of 2,307 participants (1,304 identified users and 1,003 partners). Abstinence from substance use was measured using the Timeline Followback Interview, while relationship adjustment was measured using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test, the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, or the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire. Separate random-effects meta-analyses revealed small effects sizes in favor of BCT on abstinence from substance use (g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]) and relationship adjustment (g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54]). Independent random-effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and influential moderating variables on treatment outcomes. Counselors should exercise caution when adopting a BCT approach for couples with substance use and relationship adjustment issues, and consider how alternative treatment methods may be just as effective.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"7 1","pages":"57 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Couples Therapy for Increasing Abstinence From Substance Use and Relationship Adjustment\",\"authors\":\"Michael K. Schmit, Erika L. Schmit, A. Lenz, Joshua Hawkins, Sarah A. Silveus, Candace Chuyou-Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) on increasing abstinence from substance use and relationship adjustment when compared to alternative treatments. Using meta-analytic procedures, we synthesized 17 randomized, between-group studies representing the data of 2,307 participants (1,304 identified users and 1,003 partners). Abstinence from substance use was measured using the Timeline Followback Interview, while relationship adjustment was measured using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test, the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, or the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire. Separate random-effects meta-analyses revealed small effects sizes in favor of BCT on abstinence from substance use (g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]) and relationship adjustment (g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54]). Independent random-effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and influential moderating variables on treatment outcomes. Counselors should exercise caution when adopting a BCT approach for couples with substance use and relationship adjustment issues, and consider how alternative treatment methods may be just as effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1796481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要:我们评估了行为夫妻治疗(BCT)在增加戒断物质使用和关系调整方面的有效性,并与其他治疗方法进行了比较。采用荟萃分析程序,我们综合了17个随机组间研究,代表2307名参与者的数据(1,304名确定的用户和1,003名合作伙伴)。戒断使用时间轴回访法进行测量,而关系调整则使用二元调整量表、洛克-华莱士婚姻调整测验、修正二元调整量表或性调整问卷进行测量。单独的随机效应荟萃分析显示,BCT对戒断物质使用的影响较小(g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]),关系调整(g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54])。独立的随机效应模型揭示了发表偏倚的证据和对治疗结果有影响的调节变量。在对有药物使用和关系调整问题的夫妇采用BCT方法时,咨询师应该谨慎行事,并考虑其他治疗方法如何同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Couples Therapy for Increasing Abstinence From Substance Use and Relationship Adjustment
Abstract We evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral couples therapy (BCT) on increasing abstinence from substance use and relationship adjustment when compared to alternative treatments. Using meta-analytic procedures, we synthesized 17 randomized, between-group studies representing the data of 2,307 participants (1,304 identified users and 1,003 partners). Abstinence from substance use was measured using the Timeline Followback Interview, while relationship adjustment was measured using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test, the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, or the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire. Separate random-effects meta-analyses revealed small effects sizes in favor of BCT on abstinence from substance use (g = .21 [CI95 = .04, .39]) and relationship adjustment (g = .37 [CI95 = .21, .54]). Independent random-effects models revealed evidence of publication bias and influential moderating variables on treatment outcomes. Counselors should exercise caution when adopting a BCT approach for couples with substance use and relationship adjustment issues, and consider how alternative treatment methods may be just as effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Emotion Focused Group Therapy Using Quality Indicators Scoping Review Methodology: A Practical Guide for Counseling Researchers Creating Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Counseling: Lessons Learned A Systematic Review of Data Analysis Decisions in Counseling Single-Case Research Designs to Inform Best Practices Effectiveness of DBT Partial Hospitalization Program for Adolescents and Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1