信任问题:可信赖人工智能可靠评估的新旧指标

A. Campagner, Riccardo Angius, F. Cabitza
{"title":"信任问题:可信赖人工智能可靠评估的新旧指标","authors":"A. Campagner, Riccardo Angius, F. Cabitza","doi":"10.5220/0011679600003414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This work contributes to the evaluation of the quality of decision support systems constructed with Machine Learning (ML) techniques in Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI). In particular, we propose and discuss metrics that complement and go beyond traditional assessment practices based on the evaluation of accuracy, by focusing on two different dimensions related to the trustworthiness of a MAI system: reputation/ability, which relates to the accuracy or predictive ability of the system itself; and expertise/source reliability, which relates instead to the trustworthiness of the data which have been used to construct the MAI system. Then, we will discuss some previous, but so far mostly neglected, proposals as well novel metrics, visualizations and procedures for the sound evaluation of a MAI system’s trustworthiness, by focusing on six different concepts: advice accuracy, advice reliability, pragmatic utility, advice value, decision benefit and potential robustness. Finally, we will illustrate the application of the proposed concepts through two realistic medical case studies.","PeriodicalId":20676,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics and Medical Application Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Question of Trust: Old and New Metrics for the Reliable Assessment of Trustworthy AI\",\"authors\":\"A. Campagner, Riccardo Angius, F. Cabitza\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0011679600003414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This work contributes to the evaluation of the quality of decision support systems constructed with Machine Learning (ML) techniques in Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI). In particular, we propose and discuss metrics that complement and go beyond traditional assessment practices based on the evaluation of accuracy, by focusing on two different dimensions related to the trustworthiness of a MAI system: reputation/ability, which relates to the accuracy or predictive ability of the system itself; and expertise/source reliability, which relates instead to the trustworthiness of the data which have been used to construct the MAI system. Then, we will discuss some previous, but so far mostly neglected, proposals as well novel metrics, visualizations and procedures for the sound evaluation of a MAI system’s trustworthiness, by focusing on six different concepts: advice accuracy, advice reliability, pragmatic utility, advice value, decision benefit and potential robustness. Finally, we will illustrate the application of the proposed concepts through two realistic medical case studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics and Medical Application Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics and Medical Application Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0011679600003414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics and Medical Application Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0011679600003414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作有助于评估医疗人工智能(MAI)中使用机器学习(ML)技术构建的决策支持系统的质量。特别是,我们提出并讨论了补充和超越基于准确性评估的传统评估实践的指标,通过关注与MAI系统可信度相关的两个不同维度:声誉/能力,这与系统本身的准确性或预测能力有关;以及专业知识/来源可靠性,这与用于构建MAI系统的数据的可信度有关。然后,我们将讨论一些以前的,但到目前为止大多被忽视的建议,以及新颖的指标,可视化和程序,通过关注六个不同的概念:建议准确性,建议可靠性,实用效用,建议价值,决策效益和潜在的鲁棒性,来对MAI系统的可信度进行合理评估。最后,我们将通过两个现实的医学案例研究来说明所提出概念的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Question of Trust: Old and New Metrics for the Reliable Assessment of Trustworthy AI
: This work contributes to the evaluation of the quality of decision support systems constructed with Machine Learning (ML) techniques in Medical Artificial Intelligence (MAI). In particular, we propose and discuss metrics that complement and go beyond traditional assessment practices based on the evaluation of accuracy, by focusing on two different dimensions related to the trustworthiness of a MAI system: reputation/ability, which relates to the accuracy or predictive ability of the system itself; and expertise/source reliability, which relates instead to the trustworthiness of the data which have been used to construct the MAI system. Then, we will discuss some previous, but so far mostly neglected, proposals as well novel metrics, visualizations and procedures for the sound evaluation of a MAI system’s trustworthiness, by focusing on six different concepts: advice accuracy, advice reliability, pragmatic utility, advice value, decision benefit and potential robustness. Finally, we will illustrate the application of the proposed concepts through two realistic medical case studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technical Realization and First Insights of the Multicenter Integrative Breast Cancer Registry INTREST Development of Learning System to Support for Passing Steps of Wheelchair On the Problem of Data Availability in Automatic Voice Disorder Detection An NLP-Enhanced Approach to Test Comorbidities Risk Scoring Based on Unstructured Health Data for Hospital Readmissions Prediction A Survey on Technologies Used During out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1