利用SFAS 69补充披露评估油气公司的勘探效率

Charles E. Boynton IV , Jeffery P. Boone , Teddy L. Coe
{"title":"利用SFAS 69补充披露评估油气公司的勘探效率","authors":"Charles E. Boynton IV ,&nbsp;Jeffery P. Boone ,&nbsp;Teddy L. Coe","doi":"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00002-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investors and other users of financial statements often analyze financial statement information to evaluate the exploration efficiency of oil and gas firms. One approach commonly employed is to calculate an average per-unit cost of finding and developing oil and gas reserves using data disclosed by oil and gas firms in the footnotes to their financial statements. These average finding costs ratios, while widely used, are by no means universally accepted as providing meaningful insight into the exploration efficiency and potential profitability of an oil and gas firm. In fact, a number of financial analysts who specialize in oil and gas firms have argued that these finding costs ratios in fact provide no useful insights into how well a company has done. The purpose of our paper is to evaluate the usefulness of these finding costs measures as indicators of exploration efficiency and potential profitability. Our approach involves comparing the statistical association between various finding costs measures to a benchmark measure of exploration efficiency derived from a Cobb-Douglas regression. We also compare these finding costs measures to two commonly used financial statement measures of profitability—return on sales and return on assets—to evaluate whether finding costs are useful as indicators of profitability. Our results indicate that finding costs ratios calculated from readily available financial statement data provide useful insight into both exploration efficiency and the potential profitability of an oil and gas firm. Our findings are important because they provide empirical evidence useful in resolving a debate within the financial analyst community concerning the utility of these finding costs ratios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00002-2","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the exploration efficiency of oil and gas firms using SFAS 69 supplemental disclosures\",\"authors\":\"Charles E. Boynton IV ,&nbsp;Jeffery P. Boone ,&nbsp;Teddy L. Coe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00002-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Investors and other users of financial statements often analyze financial statement information to evaluate the exploration efficiency of oil and gas firms. One approach commonly employed is to calculate an average per-unit cost of finding and developing oil and gas reserves using data disclosed by oil and gas firms in the footnotes to their financial statements. These average finding costs ratios, while widely used, are by no means universally accepted as providing meaningful insight into the exploration efficiency and potential profitability of an oil and gas firm. In fact, a number of financial analysts who specialize in oil and gas firms have argued that these finding costs ratios in fact provide no useful insights into how well a company has done. The purpose of our paper is to evaluate the usefulness of these finding costs measures as indicators of exploration efficiency and potential profitability. Our approach involves comparing the statistical association between various finding costs measures to a benchmark measure of exploration efficiency derived from a Cobb-Douglas regression. We also compare these finding costs measures to two commonly used financial statement measures of profitability—return on sales and return on assets—to evaluate whether finding costs are useful as indicators of profitability. Our results indicate that finding costs ratios calculated from readily available financial statement data provide useful insight into both exploration efficiency and the potential profitability of an oil and gas firm. Our findings are important because they provide empirical evidence useful in resolving a debate within the financial analyst community concerning the utility of these finding costs ratios.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)00002-2\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1085744399000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

投资者和财务报表的其他使用者经常分析财务报表信息来评估石油和天然气公司的勘探效率。常用的一种方法是使用油气公司在其财务报表脚注中披露的数据来计算发现和开发油气储量的平均单位成本。这些平均发现成本比率虽然被广泛使用,但并不能被普遍接受为对油气公司的勘探效率和潜在盈利能力提供有意义的见解。事实上,一些专门研究石油和天然气公司的金融分析师认为,这些发现成本比率实际上并不能对公司的经营状况提供有用的见解。本文的目的是评估这些发现成本指标作为勘探效率和潜在盈利能力指标的实用性。我们的方法包括比较各种发现成本措施与基于Cobb-Douglas回归的勘探效率基准措施之间的统计关联。我们还将这些寻找成本指标与两种常用的盈利能力财务报表指标——销售回报率和资产回报率——进行比较,以评估寻找成本作为盈利能力指标是否有用。我们的研究结果表明,从现成的财务报表数据中计算出的成本比率为油气公司的勘探效率和潜在盈利能力提供了有用的见解。我们的发现很重要,因为它们提供了有用的经验证据,有助于解决金融分析师社区内关于这些发现成本比率的效用的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the exploration efficiency of oil and gas firms using SFAS 69 supplemental disclosures

Investors and other users of financial statements often analyze financial statement information to evaluate the exploration efficiency of oil and gas firms. One approach commonly employed is to calculate an average per-unit cost of finding and developing oil and gas reserves using data disclosed by oil and gas firms in the footnotes to their financial statements. These average finding costs ratios, while widely used, are by no means universally accepted as providing meaningful insight into the exploration efficiency and potential profitability of an oil and gas firm. In fact, a number of financial analysts who specialize in oil and gas firms have argued that these finding costs ratios in fact provide no useful insights into how well a company has done. The purpose of our paper is to evaluate the usefulness of these finding costs measures as indicators of exploration efficiency and potential profitability. Our approach involves comparing the statistical association between various finding costs measures to a benchmark measure of exploration efficiency derived from a Cobb-Douglas regression. We also compare these finding costs measures to two commonly used financial statement measures of profitability—return on sales and return on assets—to evaluate whether finding costs are useful as indicators of profitability. Our results indicate that finding costs ratios calculated from readily available financial statement data provide useful insight into both exploration efficiency and the potential profitability of an oil and gas firm. Our findings are important because they provide empirical evidence useful in resolving a debate within the financial analyst community concerning the utility of these finding costs ratios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimization of Energy Efficiency Barriers in the Context of Optimization of Management Decisions in the Process of Sustainable Development Household heterogeneity in valuation of heating energy costs ROLE OF BIG DATA IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR FINANCIAL FRAUD Porous CoP@RGO With Pseudocapacitance Characteristics for Lithium Ion Storage Factors Affecting Renters’ Electricity Use: More than Split Incentives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1