{"title":"寻找丢失的时间常数和非米切里斯-门腾参数","authors":"Maria F. Pinto , Pedro M. Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.pisc.2016.03.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Upon completing 100 years since it was published, the work <em>Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung</em> by Michaelis and Menten (MM) was celebrated during the 6th Beilstein ESCEC Symposium 2013. As the 7th Beilstein ESCEC Symposium 2015 debates enzymology in the context of complex biological systems, a post-MM approach is required to address cell-like conditions that are well beyond the steady-state limitations. The present contribution specifically addresses two hitherto ambiguous constants whose interest was, however, intuited in the original MM paper: (i) the characteristic time constant <em>τ</em><sub>∞</sub>, which can be determined using the late stages of any progress curve independently of the substrate concentration adopted; and (ii) the dissociation constant <em>K</em><sub><em>S</em></sub>, which is indicative of the enzyme–substrate affinity and completes the kinetic portrayal of the Briggs–Haldane reaction scheme. The rationale behind <em>τ</em><sub>∞</sub> and <em>K</em><sub><em>S</em></sub> prompted us to revise widespread concepts of enzyme's efficiency, defined by the specificity constant <em>k</em><sub><em>cat</em></sub>/<em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub>, and of the Michaelis constant <em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub> seen as the substrate concentration yielding half-maximal rates. The alternative definitions here presented should help recovering the wealth of published <em>k</em><sub><em>cat</em></sub>/<em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub> and <em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub> data from the criticism that they are subjected. Finally, a practical method is envisaged for objectively determining enzyme's activity, efficiency and affinity – (EA)<sup>2</sup> – from single progress curves. The (EA)<sup>2</sup> assay can be conveniently applied even when the concentrations of substrate and enzyme are not accurately known.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92112,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in science","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.03.024","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In search of lost time constants and of non-Michaelis–Menten parameters\",\"authors\":\"Maria F. Pinto , Pedro M. Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pisc.2016.03.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Upon completing 100 years since it was published, the work <em>Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung</em> by Michaelis and Menten (MM) was celebrated during the 6th Beilstein ESCEC Symposium 2013. As the 7th Beilstein ESCEC Symposium 2015 debates enzymology in the context of complex biological systems, a post-MM approach is required to address cell-like conditions that are well beyond the steady-state limitations. The present contribution specifically addresses two hitherto ambiguous constants whose interest was, however, intuited in the original MM paper: (i) the characteristic time constant <em>τ</em><sub>∞</sub>, which can be determined using the late stages of any progress curve independently of the substrate concentration adopted; and (ii) the dissociation constant <em>K</em><sub><em>S</em></sub>, which is indicative of the enzyme–substrate affinity and completes the kinetic portrayal of the Briggs–Haldane reaction scheme. The rationale behind <em>τ</em><sub>∞</sub> and <em>K</em><sub><em>S</em></sub> prompted us to revise widespread concepts of enzyme's efficiency, defined by the specificity constant <em>k</em><sub><em>cat</em></sub>/<em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub>, and of the Michaelis constant <em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub> seen as the substrate concentration yielding half-maximal rates. The alternative definitions here presented should help recovering the wealth of published <em>k</em><sub><em>cat</em></sub>/<em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub> and <em>K</em><sub><em>M</em></sub> data from the criticism that they are subjected. Finally, a practical method is envisaged for objectively determining enzyme's activity, efficiency and affinity – (EA)<sup>2</sup> – from single progress curves. The (EA)<sup>2</sup> assay can be conveniently applied even when the concentrations of substrate and enzyme are not accurately known.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 8-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pisc.2016.03.024\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213020916302300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213020916302300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
在出版100周年之际,Michaelis和Menten (MM)的作品《Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung》在2013年第六届Beilstein ESCEC研讨会上得到了庆祝。2015年第七届Beilstein ESCEC研讨会讨论了复杂生物系统背景下的酶学,需要一种后mm方法来解决远远超出稳态限制的细胞样条件。目前的贡献具体解决了两个迄今为止含糊不清的常数,然而,在最初的MM论文中,人们对它们的兴趣是直观的:(i)特征时间常数τ∞,它可以用任何进展曲线的后期来确定,而不依赖于所采用的底物浓度;(ii)解离常数KS,表示酶与底物的亲和力,完成了布里格斯-霍尔丹反应方案的动力学描述。τ∞和KS背后的基本原理促使我们修改酶效率的广泛概念,由特异性常数kcat/KM定义,Michaelis常数KM被视为产生一半最大速率的底物浓度。这里提出的替代定义应该有助于从批评中恢复已发布的kcat/KM和KM数据的财富。最后,设想了一种从单个过程曲线中客观测定酶活性、效率和亲和力的实用方法。即使底物和酶的浓度不准确,也可以方便地应用(EA)2测定法。
In search of lost time constants and of non-Michaelis–Menten parameters
Upon completing 100 years since it was published, the work Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung by Michaelis and Menten (MM) was celebrated during the 6th Beilstein ESCEC Symposium 2013. As the 7th Beilstein ESCEC Symposium 2015 debates enzymology in the context of complex biological systems, a post-MM approach is required to address cell-like conditions that are well beyond the steady-state limitations. The present contribution specifically addresses two hitherto ambiguous constants whose interest was, however, intuited in the original MM paper: (i) the characteristic time constant τ∞, which can be determined using the late stages of any progress curve independently of the substrate concentration adopted; and (ii) the dissociation constant KS, which is indicative of the enzyme–substrate affinity and completes the kinetic portrayal of the Briggs–Haldane reaction scheme. The rationale behind τ∞ and KS prompted us to revise widespread concepts of enzyme's efficiency, defined by the specificity constant kcat/KM, and of the Michaelis constant KM seen as the substrate concentration yielding half-maximal rates. The alternative definitions here presented should help recovering the wealth of published kcat/KM and KM data from the criticism that they are subjected. Finally, a practical method is envisaged for objectively determining enzyme's activity, efficiency and affinity – (EA)2 – from single progress curves. The (EA)2 assay can be conveniently applied even when the concentrations of substrate and enzyme are not accurately known.