{"title":"Bağımzıslık Öncesi ve Sonrası Kırgız Toplumunda Din ve Dini Kurumlar Üzerine Bir Analiz","authors":"Timur Kozukulov","doi":"10.14395/hititilahiyat.669036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Regarding the sociology of religion and political science perspectives, this article attempts to examine the influence of religion on Kyrgyzstan’s social and political life after her independence from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). This study addresses the following pieces of information before discussing the current circumstances. First, the historical background of how Islam has spread in Kyrgyzstan has different narratives and needs to be addressed before explaining the role of Islam in today’s Kyrgyzstan. Also, to show how and when the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kyrgyzstan (SAMK), which is also called the Muftiyat of Kyrgyzstan, has emerged, it is necessary to examine the USSR era of Islam. In addition, since the first years of independence, religion and religious life have been given full freedom in Kyrgyzstan; however, the State Security Council in the meeting of February 2014 has decided that the prior religious freedom policy was wrong. In the following period, it was decided that the state would implement politics that would lead the religious structure and the religious life of society. In this study, religious tendencies and social sanctions for religion were studied in terms of sociology and political science in the post-independence period. Furthermore, the study focused on the work process and sanctions for the social and political stability of Kyrgyz society. This article also elaborates on the practices of the Kyrgyz state, which had a quarter-century past, on religion and shows that the practices are unstable and changing based on new circumstances. Summary Islamic elements are important in the daily life of the Kyrgyz people. Some of these are considered as traditions and customs by some people. The Kyrgyz were worshipping pre-Islamic Tengrism (Theism) and the elements of this faith. According to some researchers, Tengrism did not obstruct Islam, and it did not conflict with Islam, but rather made it easier for the Kyrgyz to embrace Islam. It has been suggested that various traditions are compatible with Islam and that they are accepted as Islamic. Tengrians keep this question in their agenda: “When did the Kyrgyz people accept Islam as a religion?” Even though they have just emerged with their current view, they claim that they have come from their ancestors. They try to portray Islam and Islamization as a distortion in society, whereas Islam has an ancient history and has become a national value and an integral part of life. The radical people identify Islam and Muslims as being Arab and disseminating this idea in society and portray the Kyrgyz Muslims as Arabized. Although they consider Kyrgyz and Islam as two different phenomena, it is clear that Kyrgyz people are Muslims from early times. Nobody can deny this fact. However, some events in the society and some practices are not accepted by some parts of the society in the name of Islam. For example, those who consider the Arab outfit as a symbol of Islam prefer to replace it with traditional or modern clothing. The clothing of the members of the Tabligh Jamaat, and some of the other radical groups, have led to this concern. Some people claim that there is no connection between Islam and Kyrgyz using these examples. During the Soviet period, there was no Islam along with the ideology of atheism. Although the understanding and ideas of these two are completely different, the clergy of the old Soviet-era expressed that there were no social problems during this period. After Kyrgyzstan gained its independence, atheism collapsed. But some issues related to Islamic misunderstanding have emerged. Since the early years of sovereignty, there have been many incidents and a new set of facts have emerged. Several ideas have emerged contradicting traditional understandings. These have led to the consolidation of Muslims. In 1993, an independent Muftiyat (Religious Affairs) was established in Kyrgyzstan under the name of “the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kyrgyzstan” apart from Tashkent. However, this institution remained very weak in religious and social matters, so it did not prevent the spread of different perceptions among the public. Even, it has led to the spread of some other perceptions. No innovations were introduced during the establishment of the Muftiyat. Just a branch of the Tashkent-based Muftiyat system during the former USSR was established in Kyrgyzstan. After the establishment of the Muftiyat, it has not been able to create a new system until today. The Muftiyat is a non-governmental organization, but they call themselves the religious administration of Muslims in Kyrgyzstan. Communities also accept it in the same way. So far, Muftiyat is the owner of mosques and madrasahs built within the borders of Kyrgyzstan. But it has no connection with the social organization and the state. Since independence, Religious Education has been carried out without a plan and system. Although so many madrasahs were opened, it was not able to spread traditional Islamic understanding. All the madrasahs are dependent on the Muftiyat. The opening of the madrasahs and the philosophy of education are generally dependent on the initiative of local religious people. In other words, if a person is a scholar then this man must have a madrasah. Even students are going to madrasah according to the name of this scholar. After independence, the state gave freedom to religion, yet tried to control it. However, the issue of religion did not play an important role in state policy. Five years after the independence, the State Commission for Religious Affairs was established by the Kyrgyz Government. At least, it is aimed to carry out the religion-related policies through this institution. This institution was not very strong in its early years. It only served to register religious institutions. The reason for the ineffectiveness of this institution was the freedom of religious belief and religious institutions, according to the law adopted in 1991. We can say that the State Commission for Religious Affairs and Muftiyat were unable to work together. These kinds of events in Kyrgyz society began to expand and spread the different misunderstanding of Islam, and of course, the state began to worry. Therefore, after 20 years of Independence, the state began to pay attention to the religious issues society. The state defines the policy towards religion in the past as wrong and tries to correct the situation in order not to fall again and make the same mistakes. The stability and continuous development of society depend on leaders and community engineers. Experts must work in this area. Unfortunately, not well-qualified experts are included in the working group in any case, we will try to examine the positive and negative aspects of this from the points of view of politics and sociology.","PeriodicalId":40974,"journal":{"name":"Hitit Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi-Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University","volume":"5 1","pages":"173-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitit Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi-Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14395/hititilahiyat.669036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文试图从宗教社会学和政治学的角度,考察宗教对吉尔吉斯斯坦脱离苏联后社会政治生活的影响。在讨论当前情况之前,本研究处理了以下信息。首先,伊斯兰教如何在吉尔吉斯斯坦传播的历史背景有不同的叙述,需要在解释伊斯兰教在今天的吉尔吉斯斯坦所扮演的角色之前加以解决。另外,为了说明被称为“穆夫提亚特”的吉尔吉斯斯坦穆斯林精神管理机构(SAMK)是如何以及何时出现的,有必要研究一下苏联时期的伊斯兰教。此外,自独立的头几年以来,宗教和宗教生活在吉尔吉斯斯坦得到充分的自由;然而,国务院在2014年2月的会议上决定,先前的宗教自由政策是错误的。在接下来的一段时间里,决定由国家实行政治来领导宗教结构和社会的宗教生活。本研究从社会学和政治学的角度,研究后独立时期的宗教倾向和社会对宗教的制裁。此外,研究的重点是吉尔吉斯社会的社会和政治稳定的工作过程和制裁。本文还详细阐述了四分之一世纪以来吉尔吉斯国家在宗教方面的做法,并表明这些做法是不稳定的,并且会随着新的情况而变化。伊斯兰元素在吉尔吉斯人的日常生活中很重要。其中一些被一些人认为是传统和习俗。吉尔吉斯人崇拜前伊斯兰教的腾格里斯主义(有神论)和这种信仰的元素。一些研究人员认为,腾格里主义并没有阻碍伊斯兰教,也没有与伊斯兰教发生冲突,而是使吉尔吉斯人更容易接受伊斯兰教。有人认为,各种传统与伊斯兰教是相容的,它们被接受为伊斯兰教。吉尔吉斯斯坦人把这个问题列入他们的议事日程:“吉尔吉斯人是什么时候接受伊斯兰教作为宗教的?”尽管他们刚刚以目前的观点出现,但他们声称自己来自他们的祖先。他们试图把伊斯兰教和伊斯兰化描绘成社会的扭曲,而伊斯兰教有着悠久的历史,已经成为一种民族价值和生活的组成部分。激进分子认为伊斯兰教和穆斯林是阿拉伯人,并在社会上传播这种观点,把吉尔吉斯穆斯林描绘成阿拉伯化的。虽然他们认为吉尔吉斯族和伊斯兰教是两种不同的现象,但很明显吉尔吉斯人从早期起就是穆斯林。没有人能否认这一事实。然而,社会上的一些事件和一些做法是不被社会的某些部分以伊斯兰教的名义接受的。例如,那些认为阿拉伯服装是伊斯兰教象征的人更喜欢用传统或现代服装代替它。tabigh Jamaat和其他一些激进组织成员的服装引发了这种担忧。一些人用这些例子声称伊斯兰教和吉尔吉斯语之间没有联系。在苏联时期,伴随着无神论的意识形态,没有伊斯兰教。虽然这两者的理解和观念完全不同,但老苏联时代的神职人员表示,这一时期没有社会问题。吉尔吉斯斯坦独立后,无神论崩溃了。但是一些与伊斯兰误解有关的问题已经出现。自主权成立初期以来,发生了许多事件,并出现了一系列新的事实。出现了几种与传统理解相矛盾的观点。这些都导致了穆斯林的巩固。1993年,除塔什干外,吉尔吉斯斯坦成立了一个独立的穆夫提亚特(宗教事务),名为“吉尔吉斯斯坦穆斯林精神管理局”。然而,这个机构在宗教和社会事务方面仍然非常薄弱,因此它并没有阻止不同观念在公众中传播。甚至,它还导致了一些其他观念的传播。在建立穆夫提亚特期间没有进行任何创新。在前苏联时期,以塔什干为基础的穆夫提亚特体系的一个分支在吉尔吉斯斯坦建立。在穆夫提亚特成立之后,它一直未能建立一个新的制度,直到今天。穆夫提亚特是一个非政府组织,但他们自称是吉尔吉斯斯坦穆斯林的宗教管理机构。社区也以同样的方式接受它。到目前为止,穆夫提亚特是吉尔吉斯斯坦境内清真寺和伊斯兰学校的所有者。但它与社会组织和国家没有任何关系。独立以来,宗教教育的开展缺乏计划和制度。 摘要本文试图从宗教社会学和政治学的角度,考察宗教对吉尔吉斯斯坦脱离苏联后社会政治生活的影响。在讨论当前情况之前,本研究处理了以下信息。首先,伊斯兰教如何在吉尔吉斯斯坦传播的历史背景有不同的叙述,需要在解释伊斯兰教在今天的吉尔吉斯斯坦所扮演的角色之前加以解决。另外,为了说明被称为“穆夫提亚特”的吉尔吉斯斯坦穆斯林精神管理机构(SAMK)是如何以及何时出现的,有必要研究一下苏联时期的伊斯兰教。此外,自独立的头几年以来,宗教和宗教生活在吉尔吉斯斯坦得到充分的自由;然而,国务院在2014年2月的会议上决定,先前的宗教自由政策是错误的。在接下来的一段时间里,决定由国家实行政治来领导宗教结构和社会的宗教生活。本研究从社会学和政治学的角度,研究后独立时期的宗教倾向和社会对宗教的制裁。此外,研究的重点是吉尔吉斯社会的社会和政治稳定的工作过程和制裁。本文还详细阐述了四分之一世纪以来吉尔吉斯国家在宗教方面的做法,并表明这些做法是不稳定的,并且会随着新的情况而变化。伊斯兰元素在吉尔吉斯人的日常生活中很重要。其中一些被一些人认为是传统和习俗。吉尔吉斯人崇拜前伊斯兰教的腾格里斯主义(有神论)和这种信仰的元素。一些研究人员认为,腾格里主义并没有阻碍伊斯兰教,也没有与伊斯兰教发生冲突,而是使吉尔吉斯人更容易接受伊斯兰教。有人认为,各种传统与伊斯兰教是相容的,它们被接受为伊斯兰教。吉尔吉斯斯坦人把这个问题列入他们的议事日程:“吉尔吉斯人是什么时候接受伊斯兰教作为宗教的?”尽管他们刚刚以目前的观点出现,但他们声称自己来自他们的祖先。他们试图把伊斯兰教和伊斯兰化描绘成社会的扭曲,而伊斯兰教有着悠久的历史,已经成为一种民族价值和生活的组成部分。激进分子认为伊斯兰教和穆斯林是阿拉伯人,并在社会上传播这种观点,把吉尔吉斯穆斯林描绘成阿拉伯化的。虽然他们认为吉尔吉斯族和伊斯兰教是两种不同的现象,但很明显吉尔吉斯人从早期起就是穆斯林。没有人能否认这一事实。然而,社会上的一些事件和一些做法是不被社会的某些部分以伊斯兰教的名义接受的。例如,那些认为阿拉伯服装是伊斯兰教象征的人更喜欢用传统或现代服装代替它。tabigh Jamaat和其他一些激进组织成员的服装引发了这种担忧。一些人用这些例子声称伊斯兰教和吉尔吉斯语之间没有联系。在苏联时期,伴随着无神论的意识形态,没有伊斯兰教。虽然这两者的理解和观念完全不同,但老苏联时代的神职人员表示,这一时期没有社会问题。吉尔吉斯斯坦独立后,无神论崩溃了。但是一些与伊斯兰误解有关的问题已经出现。自主权成立初期以来,发生了许多事件,并出现了一系列新的事实。出现了几种与传统理解相矛盾的观点。这些都导致了穆斯林的巩固。1993年,除塔什干外,吉尔吉斯斯坦成立了一个独立的穆夫提亚特(宗教事务),名为“吉尔吉斯斯坦穆斯林精神管理局”。然而,这个机构在宗教和社会事务方面仍然非常薄弱,因此它并没有阻止不同观念在公众中传播。甚至,它还导致了一些其他观念的传播。在建立穆夫提亚特期间没有进行任何创新。在前苏联时期,以塔什干为基础的穆夫提亚特体系的一个分支在吉尔吉斯斯坦建立。在穆夫提亚特成立之后,它一直未能建立一个新的制度,直到今天。穆夫提亚特是一个非政府组织,但他们自称是吉尔吉斯斯坦穆斯林的宗教管理机构。社区也以同样的方式接受它。到目前为止,穆夫提亚特是吉尔吉斯斯坦境内清真寺和伊斯兰学校的所有者。但它与社会组织和国家没有任何关系。独立以来,宗教教育的开展缺乏计划和制度。 尽管开设了这么多伊斯兰学校,但它并不能传播传统的伊斯兰教义。所有的伊斯兰学校都依赖于伊斯兰教法。伊斯兰学校和教育理念的开放通常取决于当地宗教人士的主动性。换句话说,如果一个人是学者,那么这个人必须有一个伊斯兰学校。根据这位学者的名字,甚至有学生要去伊斯兰学校。独立后,国家给予宗教自由,但又试图控制宗教。然而,宗教问题并没有在国家政策中发挥重要作用。独立五年后,吉尔吉斯政府成立了国家宗教事务委员会。至少,它的目的是通过这个机构来执行与宗教有关的政策。这个机构在成立之初并不十分强大。它只用于登记宗教机构。根据1991年通过的法律,该机构无效的原因是宗教信仰自由和宗教机构。我们可以说,国家宗教事务委员会和穆夫提亚无法一起工作。这些事件在吉尔吉斯社会开始扩大和传播对伊斯兰教的不同误解,当然,国家开始担心。因此,独立20年后,国家开始重视社会的宗教问题。国家将过去的宗教政策定义为错误的,并试图纠正这种情况,以免再次跌倒并犯同样的错误。社会的稳定和持续发展依赖于领导者和社区工程师。专家必须在这个领域工作。不幸的是,工作小组中没有合格的专家,无论如何,我们将试图从政治和社会学的角度来审查这方面的积极和消极方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bağımzıslık Öncesi ve Sonrası Kırgız Toplumunda Din ve Dini Kurumlar Üzerine Bir Analiz
Abstract Regarding the sociology of religion and political science perspectives, this article attempts to examine the influence of religion on Kyrgyzstan’s social and political life after her independence from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). This study addresses the following pieces of information before discussing the current circumstances. First, the historical background of how Islam has spread in Kyrgyzstan has different narratives and needs to be addressed before explaining the role of Islam in today’s Kyrgyzstan. Also, to show how and when the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kyrgyzstan (SAMK), which is also called the Muftiyat of Kyrgyzstan, has emerged, it is necessary to examine the USSR era of Islam. In addition, since the first years of independence, religion and religious life have been given full freedom in Kyrgyzstan; however, the State Security Council in the meeting of February 2014 has decided that the prior religious freedom policy was wrong. In the following period, it was decided that the state would implement politics that would lead the religious structure and the religious life of society. In this study, religious tendencies and social sanctions for religion were studied in terms of sociology and political science in the post-independence period. Furthermore, the study focused on the work process and sanctions for the social and political stability of Kyrgyz society. This article also elaborates on the practices of the Kyrgyz state, which had a quarter-century past, on religion and shows that the practices are unstable and changing based on new circumstances. Summary Islamic elements are important in the daily life of the Kyrgyz people. Some of these are considered as traditions and customs by some people. The Kyrgyz were worshipping pre-Islamic Tengrism (Theism) and the elements of this faith. According to some researchers, Tengrism did not obstruct Islam, and it did not conflict with Islam, but rather made it easier for the Kyrgyz to embrace Islam. It has been suggested that various traditions are compatible with Islam and that they are accepted as Islamic. Tengrians keep this question in their agenda: “When did the Kyrgyz people accept Islam as a religion?” Even though they have just emerged with their current view, they claim that they have come from their ancestors. They try to portray Islam and Islamization as a distortion in society, whereas Islam has an ancient history and has become a national value and an integral part of life. The radical people identify Islam and Muslims as being Arab and disseminating this idea in society and portray the Kyrgyz Muslims as Arabized. Although they consider Kyrgyz and Islam as two different phenomena, it is clear that Kyrgyz people are Muslims from early times. Nobody can deny this fact. However, some events in the society and some practices are not accepted by some parts of the society in the name of Islam. For example, those who consider the Arab outfit as a symbol of Islam prefer to replace it with traditional or modern clothing. The clothing of the members of the Tabligh Jamaat, and some of the other radical groups, have led to this concern. Some people claim that there is no connection between Islam and Kyrgyz using these examples. During the Soviet period, there was no Islam along with the ideology of atheism. Although the understanding and ideas of these two are completely different, the clergy of the old Soviet-era expressed that there were no social problems during this period. After Kyrgyzstan gained its independence, atheism collapsed. But some issues related to Islamic misunderstanding have emerged. Since the early years of sovereignty, there have been many incidents and a new set of facts have emerged. Several ideas have emerged contradicting traditional understandings. These have led to the consolidation of Muslims. In 1993, an independent Muftiyat (Religious Affairs) was established in Kyrgyzstan under the name of “the Spiritual Administration of Muslims of Kyrgyzstan” apart from Tashkent. However, this institution remained very weak in religious and social matters, so it did not prevent the spread of different perceptions among the public. Even, it has led to the spread of some other perceptions. No innovations were introduced during the establishment of the Muftiyat. Just a branch of the Tashkent-based Muftiyat system during the former USSR was established in Kyrgyzstan. After the establishment of the Muftiyat, it has not been able to create a new system until today. The Muftiyat is a non-governmental organization, but they call themselves the religious administration of Muslims in Kyrgyzstan. Communities also accept it in the same way. So far, Muftiyat is the owner of mosques and madrasahs built within the borders of Kyrgyzstan. But it has no connection with the social organization and the state. Since independence, Religious Education has been carried out without a plan and system. Although so many madrasahs were opened, it was not able to spread traditional Islamic understanding. All the madrasahs are dependent on the Muftiyat. The opening of the madrasahs and the philosophy of education are generally dependent on the initiative of local religious people. In other words, if a person is a scholar then this man must have a madrasah. Even students are going to madrasah according to the name of this scholar. After independence, the state gave freedom to religion, yet tried to control it. However, the issue of religion did not play an important role in state policy. Five years after the independence, the State Commission for Religious Affairs was established by the Kyrgyz Government. At least, it is aimed to carry out the religion-related policies through this institution. This institution was not very strong in its early years. It only served to register religious institutions. The reason for the ineffectiveness of this institution was the freedom of religious belief and religious institutions, according to the law adopted in 1991. We can say that the State Commission for Religious Affairs and Muftiyat were unable to work together. These kinds of events in Kyrgyz society began to expand and spread the different misunderstanding of Islam, and of course, the state began to worry. Therefore, after 20 years of Independence, the state began to pay attention to the religious issues society. The state defines the policy towards religion in the past as wrong and tries to correct the situation in order not to fall again and make the same mistakes. The stability and continuous development of society depend on leaders and community engineers. Experts must work in this area. Unfortunately, not well-qualified experts are included in the working group in any case, we will try to examine the positive and negative aspects of this from the points of view of politics and sociology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Religious Education as Conditioned by Modern Psychology and Pedagogy Regulatory Arrangement for SharÊÑah Governance Practice of Islamic Banking Institutions in Pakistan: Issues and Challenges Mustafa Karagöz, Sözlükbilim ve Tefsir Tehzîbü’l-Luga Taha Çelik, Hadis Mezhep İhtilaf (Beyhakî’nin Tahâvî’ye İtirazları) H. Yunus Apaydın, Din ve Fıkıh Yazıları
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1