Hanoch Dagan“财产的自由理论”图书研讨会(CUP 2021)

Yael R. Lifshitz, Irit Samet
{"title":"Hanoch Dagan“财产的自由理论”图书研讨会(CUP 2021)","authors":"Yael R. Lifshitz, Irit Samet","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2022.2040162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are delighted to gather here, in this special edition of KLJ, fi ve papers which re fl ect on one of the most important books in the recent crop on theory of private law. The reviews and the authors ’ response highlight different aspects of this original and thought-provoking text. Dagan starts off from the crucial insight that property enhances autonomy for many people, but not for all. Because it both empowers and disables, property requires constant vigilance. His main thesis is therefore that a genuinely liberal property law meets this legitimacy challenge by expanding people ’ s oppor-tunities for individual and collective self-determination, while at the same time carefully restricting their options of domination over others. Liberal property empowers self-determining individuals to pursue their conception of the good. While property is not the most fundamental precondition of personal self-determination, it nonetheless has a distinctive role in empowering people. It provides them with some temporally extended control over tangible and intangible resources, which they need in order to carry out their projects and advance their plans. It is this autonomy-enhancing telos that legitimizes property and shapes, or at least should shape, its legal contours in a liberal polity. does not deny that property systems assign private authority over resources in numerous different ways or that not every system of private property can plausibly be interpreted as guided by the liberal commitment to individual self-determination. But he insists that the heavy legitimacy burden that haunts property implies that for owners ’ private authority to be justi fi ed, property must both rely upon and be guided by its","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"63 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Symposium on Hanoch Dagan ‘A Liberal Theory of Property’ (CUP 2021)\",\"authors\":\"Yael R. Lifshitz, Irit Samet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2022.2040162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are delighted to gather here, in this special edition of KLJ, fi ve papers which re fl ect on one of the most important books in the recent crop on theory of private law. The reviews and the authors ’ response highlight different aspects of this original and thought-provoking text. Dagan starts off from the crucial insight that property enhances autonomy for many people, but not for all. Because it both empowers and disables, property requires constant vigilance. His main thesis is therefore that a genuinely liberal property law meets this legitimacy challenge by expanding people ’ s oppor-tunities for individual and collective self-determination, while at the same time carefully restricting their options of domination over others. Liberal property empowers self-determining individuals to pursue their conception of the good. While property is not the most fundamental precondition of personal self-determination, it nonetheless has a distinctive role in empowering people. It provides them with some temporally extended control over tangible and intangible resources, which they need in order to carry out their projects and advance their plans. It is this autonomy-enhancing telos that legitimizes property and shapes, or at least should shape, its legal contours in a liberal polity. does not deny that property systems assign private authority over resources in numerous different ways or that not every system of private property can plausibly be interpreted as guided by the liberal commitment to individual self-determination. But he insists that the heavy legitimacy burden that haunts property implies that for owners ’ private authority to be justi fi ed, property must both rely upon and be guided by its\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2040162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2040162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们很高兴在这里,在KLJ的特别版中,聚集了五篇论文,它们反映了最近私法理论中最重要的书籍之一。评论和作者的回应突出了这个原创和发人深省的文本的不同方面。达甘从一个关键的洞见出发,即财产增强了许多人的自主权,但不是所有人的。因为财产既赋予人权力又使人丧失能力,所以需要时刻保持警惕。因此,他的主要论点是,一个真正自由的财产法通过扩大人们的机会——个人和集体自决的机会,同时谨慎地限制他们对他人的统治选择,来应对这种合法性挑战。自由主义财产赋予自主的个人追求他们对善的概念的权力。虽然财产不是个人自决的最基本先决条件,但它在赋予人民权力方面发挥着独特的作用。它为他们提供了对有形和无形资源的暂时扩展控制,他们需要这些资源来执行他们的项目和推进他们的计划。正是这种增强自主权的目的使财产合法化,并在自由政体中塑造或至少应该塑造其法律轮廓。并不否认财产制度以许多不同的方式赋予私人对资源的权力,也不否认并非每一种私有财产制度都可以合理地解释为以自由主义对个人自决的承诺为指导。但他坚持认为,困扰财产的沉重的合法性负担意味着,为了使所有者的私人权力得到证明,财产必须依赖并受其指导
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Symposium on Hanoch Dagan ‘A Liberal Theory of Property’ (CUP 2021)
We are delighted to gather here, in this special edition of KLJ, fi ve papers which re fl ect on one of the most important books in the recent crop on theory of private law. The reviews and the authors ’ response highlight different aspects of this original and thought-provoking text. Dagan starts off from the crucial insight that property enhances autonomy for many people, but not for all. Because it both empowers and disables, property requires constant vigilance. His main thesis is therefore that a genuinely liberal property law meets this legitimacy challenge by expanding people ’ s oppor-tunities for individual and collective self-determination, while at the same time carefully restricting their options of domination over others. Liberal property empowers self-determining individuals to pursue their conception of the good. While property is not the most fundamental precondition of personal self-determination, it nonetheless has a distinctive role in empowering people. It provides them with some temporally extended control over tangible and intangible resources, which they need in order to carry out their projects and advance their plans. It is this autonomy-enhancing telos that legitimizes property and shapes, or at least should shape, its legal contours in a liberal polity. does not deny that property systems assign private authority over resources in numerous different ways or that not every system of private property can plausibly be interpreted as guided by the liberal commitment to individual self-determination. But he insists that the heavy legitimacy burden that haunts property implies that for owners ’ private authority to be justi fi ed, property must both rely upon and be guided by its
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1