用于北极海冰运动每日预报的机器学习:模型预测技能的归因评估

Lauren Hoffman, M. Mazloff, S. Gille, D. Giglio, C. Bitz, P. Heimbach, Kayli Matsuyoshi
{"title":"用于北极海冰运动每日预报的机器学习:模型预测技能的归因评估","authors":"Lauren Hoffman, M. Mazloff, S. Gille, D. Giglio, C. Bitz, P. Heimbach, Kayli Matsuyoshi","doi":"10.1175/aies-d-23-0004.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPhysics-based simulations of Arctic sea ice are highly complex, involving transport between different phases, length scales, and time scales. Resultantly, numerical simulations of sea-ice dynamics have a high computational cost and model uncertainty. We employ data-driven machine learning (ML) to make predictions of sea-ice motion. The ML models are built to predict present-day sea-ice velocity given present-day wind velocity and previous-day sea-ice concentration and velocity. Models are trained using reanalysis winds and satellite-derived sea-ice properties. We compare the predictions of three different models: persistence (PS), linear regression (LR), and convolutional neural network (CNN). We quantify the spatio-temporal variability of the correlation between observations and the statistical model predictions. Additionally, we analyze model performance in comparison to variability in properties related to ice motion (wind velocity, ice velocity, ice concentration, distance from coast, bathymetric depth) to understand the processes related to decreases in model performance. Results indicate that a CNN makes skillful predictions of daily sea-ice velocity with a correlation up to 0.81 between predicted and observed sea-ice velocity, while the LR and PS implementations exhibit correlations of 0.78 and 0.69, respectively. The correlation varies spatially and seasonally; lower values occur in shallow coastal regions and during times of minimum sea-ice extent. LR parameter analysis indicates that wind velocity plays the largest role in predicting sea-ice velocity on one-day time scales, particularly in the central Arctic. Regions where wind velocity has the largest LR parameter are regions where the CNN has higher predictive skill than the LR.","PeriodicalId":94369,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning for daily forecasts of Arctic sea-ice motion: an attribution assessment of model predictive skill\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Hoffman, M. Mazloff, S. Gille, D. Giglio, C. Bitz, P. Heimbach, Kayli Matsuyoshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/aies-d-23-0004.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPhysics-based simulations of Arctic sea ice are highly complex, involving transport between different phases, length scales, and time scales. Resultantly, numerical simulations of sea-ice dynamics have a high computational cost and model uncertainty. We employ data-driven machine learning (ML) to make predictions of sea-ice motion. The ML models are built to predict present-day sea-ice velocity given present-day wind velocity and previous-day sea-ice concentration and velocity. Models are trained using reanalysis winds and satellite-derived sea-ice properties. We compare the predictions of three different models: persistence (PS), linear regression (LR), and convolutional neural network (CNN). We quantify the spatio-temporal variability of the correlation between observations and the statistical model predictions. Additionally, we analyze model performance in comparison to variability in properties related to ice motion (wind velocity, ice velocity, ice concentration, distance from coast, bathymetric depth) to understand the processes related to decreases in model performance. Results indicate that a CNN makes skillful predictions of daily sea-ice velocity with a correlation up to 0.81 between predicted and observed sea-ice velocity, while the LR and PS implementations exhibit correlations of 0.78 and 0.69, respectively. The correlation varies spatially and seasonally; lower values occur in shallow coastal regions and during times of minimum sea-ice extent. LR parameter analysis indicates that wind velocity plays the largest role in predicting sea-ice velocity on one-day time scales, particularly in the central Arctic. Regions where wind velocity has the largest LR parameter are regions where the CNN has higher predictive skill than the LR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-23-0004.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence for the earth systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/aies-d-23-0004.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于物理的北极海冰模拟非常复杂,涉及不同阶段、长度尺度和时间尺度之间的迁移。因此,海冰动力学的数值模拟具有较高的计算成本和模型不确定性。我们使用数据驱动的机器学习(ML)来预测海冰的运动。ML模型是根据当前的风速和前一天的海冰浓度和速度来预测当前海冰速度的。使用再分析风和卫星获取的海冰特性来训练模型。我们比较了三种不同模型的预测:持久性(PS)、线性回归(LR)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。我们量化了观测值与统计模型预测之间相关性的时空变异性。此外,我们分析了模型性能与冰运动相关特性(风速、冰速度、冰浓度、离海岸距离、水深)的可变性,以了解与模型性能下降相关的过程。结果表明,CNN能够较好地预测海冰日速度,预测海冰日速度与观测海冰日速度的相关系数高达0.81,而LR和PS实现的相关系数分别为0.78和0.69。相关性存在空间和季节差异;较低的数值出现在浅海岸区和海冰面积最小的时期。LR参数分析表明,风速在一天时间尺度上对海冰速度的预测作用最大,特别是在北极中部。风速LR参数最大的地区是CNN预测能力高于LR的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning for daily forecasts of Arctic sea-ice motion: an attribution assessment of model predictive skill
Physics-based simulations of Arctic sea ice are highly complex, involving transport between different phases, length scales, and time scales. Resultantly, numerical simulations of sea-ice dynamics have a high computational cost and model uncertainty. We employ data-driven machine learning (ML) to make predictions of sea-ice motion. The ML models are built to predict present-day sea-ice velocity given present-day wind velocity and previous-day sea-ice concentration and velocity. Models are trained using reanalysis winds and satellite-derived sea-ice properties. We compare the predictions of three different models: persistence (PS), linear regression (LR), and convolutional neural network (CNN). We quantify the spatio-temporal variability of the correlation between observations and the statistical model predictions. Additionally, we analyze model performance in comparison to variability in properties related to ice motion (wind velocity, ice velocity, ice concentration, distance from coast, bathymetric depth) to understand the processes related to decreases in model performance. Results indicate that a CNN makes skillful predictions of daily sea-ice velocity with a correlation up to 0.81 between predicted and observed sea-ice velocity, while the LR and PS implementations exhibit correlations of 0.78 and 0.69, respectively. The correlation varies spatially and seasonally; lower values occur in shallow coastal regions and during times of minimum sea-ice extent. LR parameter analysis indicates that wind velocity plays the largest role in predicting sea-ice velocity on one-day time scales, particularly in the central Arctic. Regions where wind velocity has the largest LR parameter are regions where the CNN has higher predictive skill than the LR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transferability and explainability of deep learning emulators for regional climate model projections: Perspectives for future applications Classification of ice particle shapes using machine learning on forward light scattering images Convolutional encoding and normalizing flows: a deep learning approach for offshore wind speed probabilistic forecasting in the Mediterranean Sea Neural networks to find the optimal forcing for offsetting the anthropogenic climate change effects Machine Learning Approach for Spatiotemporal Multivariate Optimization of Environmental Monitoring Sensor Locations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1