社区医院招募策略:在前瞻性队列研究中多样化和公平地选择孕妇[ID: 1377833]

E. Sutton, A. Cowan, C. Haverty, Briasha D. Jones, Alison Moe, Donna Russell
{"title":"社区医院招募策略:在前瞻性队列研究中多样化和公平地选择孕妇[ID: 1377833]","authors":"E. Sutton, A. Cowan, C. Haverty, Briasha D. Jones, Alison Moe, Donna Russell","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930232.53045.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The same factors contributing to disproportionately worse health outcomes are also barriers to inclusion in research for Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous patients. In this subanalysis of a large, multisite prospective cohort study of maternal plasma mRNA signatures and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), we sought to determine whether equitable representation was aided by the inclusion of a large community hospital as an enrollment site. METHODS: Pregnant persons between 18 and 45 year old with a singleton pregnancy eligible to enroll in this IRB-approved prospective cohort study at Woman’s Hospital (Baton Rouge, Louisiana). A hybrid of indirect and direct recruitment strategies, bolstered by text message communication and gift card compensation, were deployed to facilitate enrollment that mirrored the community’s diversity. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred twenty-two participants have been enrolled over 22 months (18% of the hospital’s eligible patient population): 41% of participants are Black, 9% are of Hispanic origin, 50% are White, and 9% Other race. This identically mirrors the demographics of the hospital obstetric patient population (38% Black, 7% Hispanic, 49% White, and 13% Other). CONCLUSION: Participants overall mirrored the diverse population served. Inclusion of study sites outside of the traditional academic setting is an effective strategy for promoting equitable access to clinical research, combating barriers to inclusion in research faced by the populations that are disproportionately affected by APOs.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Main Street, USA Enrollment: Community Hospital Recruitment Strategies for Diverse and Equitable Selection of Pregnant Participants in a Prospective Cohort Study [ID: 1377833]\",\"authors\":\"E. Sutton, A. Cowan, C. Haverty, Briasha D. Jones, Alison Moe, Donna Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aog.0000930232.53045.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The same factors contributing to disproportionately worse health outcomes are also barriers to inclusion in research for Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous patients. In this subanalysis of a large, multisite prospective cohort study of maternal plasma mRNA signatures and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), we sought to determine whether equitable representation was aided by the inclusion of a large community hospital as an enrollment site. METHODS: Pregnant persons between 18 and 45 year old with a singleton pregnancy eligible to enroll in this IRB-approved prospective cohort study at Woman’s Hospital (Baton Rouge, Louisiana). A hybrid of indirect and direct recruitment strategies, bolstered by text message communication and gift card compensation, were deployed to facilitate enrollment that mirrored the community’s diversity. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred twenty-two participants have been enrolled over 22 months (18% of the hospital’s eligible patient population): 41% of participants are Black, 9% are of Hispanic origin, 50% are White, and 9% Other race. This identically mirrors the demographics of the hospital obstetric patient population (38% Black, 7% Hispanic, 49% White, and 13% Other). CONCLUSION: Participants overall mirrored the diverse population served. Inclusion of study sites outside of the traditional academic setting is an effective strategy for promoting equitable access to clinical research, combating barriers to inclusion in research faced by the populations that are disproportionately affected by APOs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930232.53045.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930232.53045.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:导致健康结果不成比例恶化的因素同样也是纳入黑人、西班牙裔和土著患者研究的障碍。本亚分析是一项大型、多地点前瞻性队列研究,研究母体血浆mRNA特征和不良妊娠结局(APOs),我们试图确定纳入大型社区医院作为入组地点是否有助于公平代表性。方法:年龄在18 - 45岁的单胎妊娠孕妇有资格参加这项irb批准的前瞻性队列研究,该研究在妇女医院(Baton Rouge, Louisiana)进行。在短信交流和礼品卡补偿的支持下,采用间接和直接的混合招聘策略,促进了反映社区多样性的招生。结果:2,522名参与者在22个月的时间里被纳入研究(占医院符合条件的患者人数的18%):41%的参与者是黑人,9%是西班牙裔,50%是白人,9%是其他种族。这同样反映了医院产科患者的人口统计数据(黑人38%,西班牙裔7%,白人49%,其他13%)。结论:参与者总体上反映了所服务人群的多样性。纳入传统学术环境之外的研究地点是促进公平获取临床研究的一项有效战略,消除了受apo不成比例影响的人群在纳入研究方面面临的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Main Street, USA Enrollment: Community Hospital Recruitment Strategies for Diverse and Equitable Selection of Pregnant Participants in a Prospective Cohort Study [ID: 1377833]
INTRODUCTION: The same factors contributing to disproportionately worse health outcomes are also barriers to inclusion in research for Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous patients. In this subanalysis of a large, multisite prospective cohort study of maternal plasma mRNA signatures and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), we sought to determine whether equitable representation was aided by the inclusion of a large community hospital as an enrollment site. METHODS: Pregnant persons between 18 and 45 year old with a singleton pregnancy eligible to enroll in this IRB-approved prospective cohort study at Woman’s Hospital (Baton Rouge, Louisiana). A hybrid of indirect and direct recruitment strategies, bolstered by text message communication and gift card compensation, were deployed to facilitate enrollment that mirrored the community’s diversity. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred twenty-two participants have been enrolled over 22 months (18% of the hospital’s eligible patient population): 41% of participants are Black, 9% are of Hispanic origin, 50% are White, and 9% Other race. This identically mirrors the demographics of the hospital obstetric patient population (38% Black, 7% Hispanic, 49% White, and 13% Other). CONCLUSION: Participants overall mirrored the diverse population served. Inclusion of study sites outside of the traditional academic setting is an effective strategy for promoting equitable access to clinical research, combating barriers to inclusion in research faced by the populations that are disproportionately affected by APOs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1