税务费用鉴定的国际实践

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Analysts Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-91-103
T. Tischenko
{"title":"税务费用鉴定的国际实践","authors":"T. Tischenko","doi":"10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-91-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it is generally accepted in foreign jurisdictions to treat tax expenditures as foregone budget revenues, due to the application of certain provisions of the tax code, significant cross-country differences emerge in determining which of these can be recognized as deviations and which as the norm. There is no consensus on which approaches can be recognized as best practice. The topic of methods for determining tax expenditures remains relevant. The purpose of the study is to identify the principles and criteria of tax expense accounting. Theoretical basis of the study consists of legal acts and approaches to definition of normative tax structure. The research is conducted with the use of empirical methods, including synthesis and comparative analysis of cases. As a result of the study a classification of tax preferences was developed and two methods of tax expense identification, normative and conditional, were proposed. A certain correlation between the concepts of tax expenses and methods of their identification was revealed. The international practice of attributing preferences to tax expenses was reviewed, which helps to understand the differences in the identification methods suggested by the author. The conclusion on advantages and limitations of the use of the two methods of tax expense accounting is made.","PeriodicalId":48062,"journal":{"name":"Financial Analysts Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Practice of Tax Expense Identification\",\"authors\":\"T. Tischenko\",\"doi\":\"10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-91-103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While it is generally accepted in foreign jurisdictions to treat tax expenditures as foregone budget revenues, due to the application of certain provisions of the tax code, significant cross-country differences emerge in determining which of these can be recognized as deviations and which as the norm. There is no consensus on which approaches can be recognized as best practice. The topic of methods for determining tax expenditures remains relevant. The purpose of the study is to identify the principles and criteria of tax expense accounting. Theoretical basis of the study consists of legal acts and approaches to definition of normative tax structure. The research is conducted with the use of empirical methods, including synthesis and comparative analysis of cases. As a result of the study a classification of tax preferences was developed and two methods of tax expense identification, normative and conditional, were proposed. A certain correlation between the concepts of tax expenses and methods of their identification was revealed. The international practice of attributing preferences to tax expenses was reviewed, which helps to understand the differences in the identification methods suggested by the author. The conclusion on advantages and limitations of the use of the two methods of tax expense accounting is made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-91-103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-91-103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在外国司法管辖区普遍接受将税收支出视为先前的预算收入,但由于适用税法的某些规定,在确定哪些可以被认为是偏差,哪些可以被认为是规范方面出现了重大的跨国差异。对于哪些方法可以被认为是最佳实践,目前还没有达成共识。确定税收支出方法的主题仍然是相关的。本研究的目的是确定税务费用会计的原则和标准。研究的理论基础包括法律行为和规范税收结构的界定方法。本研究采用实证方法,包括案例综合分析和比较分析。研究的结果是对税收优惠进行了分类,并提出了两种确定税收费用的方法,即规范性和有条件的方法。揭示了税项费用概念与税项费用识别方法之间存在一定的相关性。回顾了将优惠归因于税收费用的国际惯例,这有助于理解作者建议的识别方法的差异。总结了两种税项费用核算方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International Practice of Tax Expense Identification
While it is generally accepted in foreign jurisdictions to treat tax expenditures as foregone budget revenues, due to the application of certain provisions of the tax code, significant cross-country differences emerge in determining which of these can be recognized as deviations and which as the norm. There is no consensus on which approaches can be recognized as best practice. The topic of methods for determining tax expenditures remains relevant. The purpose of the study is to identify the principles and criteria of tax expense accounting. Theoretical basis of the study consists of legal acts and approaches to definition of normative tax structure. The research is conducted with the use of empirical methods, including synthesis and comparative analysis of cases. As a result of the study a classification of tax preferences was developed and two methods of tax expense identification, normative and conditional, were proposed. A certain correlation between the concepts of tax expenses and methods of their identification was revealed. The international practice of attributing preferences to tax expenses was reviewed, which helps to understand the differences in the identification methods suggested by the author. The conclusion on advantages and limitations of the use of the two methods of tax expense accounting is made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Analysts Journal
Financial Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Financial Analysts Journal aims to be the leading practitioner journal in the investment management community by advancing the knowledge and understanding of the practice of investment management through the publication of rigorous, peer-reviewed, practitioner-relevant research from leading academics and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Choices Matter When Training Machine Learning Models for Return Prediction The Importance of Joining Lifecycle Models with Mean-Variance Optimization Transaction Costs and Capacity of Systematic Corporate Bond Strategies Predicting Corporate Bond Illiquidity via Machine Learning Nonlinear Factor Returns in the US Equity Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1