普埃布拉山谷玉米品种对不同施肥来源的响应

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRONOMY Terra Latinoamericana Pub Date : 2018-01-22 DOI:10.28940/terra.v36i1.309
Rafael Alvarado Teyssier, E. A. Ruíz, Juan de Dios Guerrero Rodríguez, José Isabel Olvera Hernández, Ángel Bustamante González, Samuel Vargas López, J. H. H. Salgado
{"title":"普埃布拉山谷玉米品种对不同施肥来源的响应","authors":"Rafael Alvarado Teyssier, E. A. Ruíz, Juan de Dios Guerrero Rodríguez, José Isabel Olvera Hernández, Ángel Bustamante González, Samuel Vargas López, J. H. H. Salgado","doi":"10.28940/terra.v36i1.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, there are biologically sustainable options that can partially replace synthetic fertilizers and reduce production costs. To test the response of 18 maize varieties to synthetic fertilization (FQ), synthetic fertilization plus inoculant (FQB) and synthetic fertilization plus compost (FQC), in 2010 two experiments were established in rainfed conditions in the Valley of Puebla, with a completely randomized design, under a split plots arrangement, with three replications. Type of fertilization was assigned to the main plot and maize genotypes were the split plot. No differences were found in grain and stover yield by type of fertilization. There was a strong interaction between varieties and type of fertilizer as well as between varieties and location in grain and stover yield. For the interaction between variety and type of fertilization, it was found that 56% of the varieties showed higher yields with FQC, in while 27.8% had higher yields with FQB and 16.7% yielded better with FQ. The highest stover yield was obtained in San Andres Calpan with FQC (8.8 Mg ha-1), while in San Pedro Tlaltenango it was obtained with FQB (15.3 Mg ha‑1) and FQ (15.4 Mg ha‑1). The use of both synthetic fertilization and inoculant or compost maintains and increases maize grain and stover yield, compared with using only synthetic fertilizer.","PeriodicalId":52301,"journal":{"name":"Terra Latinoamericana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respuesta de variedades de maíz (Zea mays L.) a diferentes fuentes de fertilización en el Valle de Puebla\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Alvarado Teyssier, E. A. Ruíz, Juan de Dios Guerrero Rodríguez, José Isabel Olvera Hernández, Ángel Bustamante González, Samuel Vargas López, J. H. H. Salgado\",\"doi\":\"10.28940/terra.v36i1.309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, there are biologically sustainable options that can partially replace synthetic fertilizers and reduce production costs. To test the response of 18 maize varieties to synthetic fertilization (FQ), synthetic fertilization plus inoculant (FQB) and synthetic fertilization plus compost (FQC), in 2010 two experiments were established in rainfed conditions in the Valley of Puebla, with a completely randomized design, under a split plots arrangement, with three replications. Type of fertilization was assigned to the main plot and maize genotypes were the split plot. No differences were found in grain and stover yield by type of fertilization. There was a strong interaction between varieties and type of fertilizer as well as between varieties and location in grain and stover yield. For the interaction between variety and type of fertilization, it was found that 56% of the varieties showed higher yields with FQC, in while 27.8% had higher yields with FQB and 16.7% yielded better with FQ. The highest stover yield was obtained in San Andres Calpan with FQC (8.8 Mg ha-1), while in San Pedro Tlaltenango it was obtained with FQB (15.3 Mg ha‑1) and FQ (15.4 Mg ha‑1). The use of both synthetic fertilization and inoculant or compost maintains and increases maize grain and stover yield, compared with using only synthetic fertilizer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Terra Latinoamericana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Terra Latinoamericana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v36i1.309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terra Latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v36i1.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,有生物可持续的选择,可以部分取代合成肥料,降低生产成本。为研究18个玉米品种对合成施肥(FQ)、合成施肥+接种剂(FQB)和合成施肥+堆肥(FQC)的响应,于2010年在普埃布拉谷旱作条件下,采用完全随机设计,分畦布置,3个重复。施肥类型为主地块,玉米基因型为分块地块。不同施肥方式对籽粒和秸秆产量无显著影响。在籽粒和秸秆产量方面,品种与肥料类型之间、品种与地点之间存在较强的相互作用。在品种与施肥类型的互作中,56%的品种FQC增产,27.8%的品种FQB增产,16.7%的品种FQB增产。在San Andres Calpan, FQC (8.8 Mg ha-1)获得最高的秸秆产量,而在San Pedro Tlaltenango, FQB (15.3 Mg ha-1)和FQ (15.4 Mg ha-1)获得最高的秸秆产量。与只使用合成肥料相比,同时使用合成肥料和接种剂或堆肥可以保持和增加玉米籽粒和秸秆的产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Respuesta de variedades de maíz (Zea mays L.) a diferentes fuentes de fertilización en el Valle de Puebla
Nowadays, there are biologically sustainable options that can partially replace synthetic fertilizers and reduce production costs. To test the response of 18 maize varieties to synthetic fertilization (FQ), synthetic fertilization plus inoculant (FQB) and synthetic fertilization plus compost (FQC), in 2010 two experiments were established in rainfed conditions in the Valley of Puebla, with a completely randomized design, under a split plots arrangement, with three replications. Type of fertilization was assigned to the main plot and maize genotypes were the split plot. No differences were found in grain and stover yield by type of fertilization. There was a strong interaction between varieties and type of fertilizer as well as between varieties and location in grain and stover yield. For the interaction between variety and type of fertilization, it was found that 56% of the varieties showed higher yields with FQC, in while 27.8% had higher yields with FQB and 16.7% yielded better with FQ. The highest stover yield was obtained in San Andres Calpan with FQC (8.8 Mg ha-1), while in San Pedro Tlaltenango it was obtained with FQB (15.3 Mg ha‑1) and FQ (15.4 Mg ha‑1). The use of both synthetic fertilization and inoculant or compost maintains and increases maize grain and stover yield, compared with using only synthetic fertilizer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Terra Latinoamericana
Terra Latinoamericana Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Importancia del Benzo(a)pireno en los sistemas biológicos y su biodegradación Acumulación y pérdida de suelo por erosión eólica en el norte de Zacatecas Producción de acelga (Beta vulgaris var. cicla L.) con efluente del cultivo de robalo (Centropomus viridis) en un sistema acuapónico Evolución de la intrusión marina y relaciones iónicas en el acuífero de La Paz BCS, México Estado hídrico y crecimiento de plantas de menta (Mentha spicata L.) bajo tratamientos con vermicompost y déficit hídrico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1