使用SAT求解器的认知图自动推理

Q3 Arts and Humanities Comma Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/FAIA220151
A. Hunter
{"title":"使用SAT求解器的认知图自动推理","authors":"A. Hunter","doi":"10.3233/FAIA220151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Epistemic graphs have been developed for modelling an agent’s degree of belief in an argument and how belief in one argument may influence the belief in other arguments. These beliefs are represented by constraints on probability distri- butions. In this paper, we present a framework for reasoning with epistemic graphs that allows for beliefs for individual arguments to be determined given beliefs in some of the other arguments. We present and evaluate algorithms based on SAT solvers.","PeriodicalId":36616,"journal":{"name":"Comma","volume":"33 1","pages":"176-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Reasoning with Epistemic Graphs Using SAT Solvers\",\"authors\":\"A. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/FAIA220151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Epistemic graphs have been developed for modelling an agent’s degree of belief in an argument and how belief in one argument may influence the belief in other arguments. These beliefs are represented by constraints on probability distri- butions. In this paper, we present a framework for reasoning with epistemic graphs that allows for beliefs for individual arguments to be determined given beliefs in some of the other arguments. We present and evaluate algorithms based on SAT solvers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comma\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"176-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

。认知图已经被开发出来,用于模拟智能体对一个论点的信念程度,以及对一个论点的信念如何影响对其他论点的信念。这些信念用概率分布的约束来表示。在本文中,我们提出了一个使用认知图进行推理的框架,该框架允许在给定某些其他论证的信念的情况下确定单个论证的信念。我们提出并评估基于SAT解算器的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automated Reasoning with Epistemic Graphs Using SAT Solvers
. Epistemic graphs have been developed for modelling an agent’s degree of belief in an argument and how belief in one argument may influence the belief in other arguments. These beliefs are represented by constraints on probability distri- butions. In this paper, we present a framework for reasoning with epistemic graphs that allows for beliefs for individual arguments to be determined given beliefs in some of the other arguments. We present and evaluate algorithms based on SAT solvers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comma
Comma Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences No man is an island entire of itself: Legal frameworks and the relocation of a nation’s archive due to rising sea levels Sunspot observations and glacier images. Archival research partnerships focusing on modern climate research 气象档案在气象发展史中的角色转变及发展趋势 Redrawing historical weather data and participatory archives for the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1