高勒克拉通航空测量质量控制的启示

M. Hutchens
{"title":"高勒克拉通航空测量质量控制的启示","authors":"M. Hutchens","doi":"10.1080/22020586.2019.12073168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The Geological Survey of South Australia (GSSA) designed the Gawler Craton Airborne Survey (GCAS) to provide high resolution magnetic, gamma-ray and elevation data covering the northern portion of the Gawler Craton. In total, 1.66 million line km were planned over an area of 295,000 km2, covering approximately 30% of the state of South Australia. The survey design of 200 m spaced lines at a ground clearance of 60 m can be compared with the design of existing regional surveys which generally employed 400 m line spacing and a ground clearance of 80 m. The new survey design results in ~2 x the data coverage and ~25% closer to the ground when compared to previous standards for regional surveys in South Australia. Due to the enormous scale of the survey, the data were acquired using four contractors who employed ten systems to fly the sixteen blocks. To standardise the data from the multitude of systems, Geoscience Australia (GA) employed a comprehensive set of technical specifications. As part of these specifications the contractors were required to fly each of the ten systems over a series of test lines termed the “Whyalla Test Lines” (Whyalla). The final GCAS data provide truly impressive high resolution regional scale products. These will allow more detailed geological interpretation of the prospective Gawler Craton. A laser altimeter was added to the list of required survey equipment. Deficiencies in the technical specifications relating to laser altimeters were identified. Standards and procedures specific to laser characteristics will need to be considered on future surveys. Analyses show that weaknesses in current standards and procedures are still evident. The weaknesses identified allow room for improvements to be made for future surveys. Gamma-ray processing results raised the most serious concerns, with repeatability not achieved. Changes to standard procedures may need to be considered.","PeriodicalId":8502,"journal":{"name":"ASEG Extended Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learnings from the Gawler Craton airborne survey quality control\",\"authors\":\"M. Hutchens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22020586.2019.12073168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The Geological Survey of South Australia (GSSA) designed the Gawler Craton Airborne Survey (GCAS) to provide high resolution magnetic, gamma-ray and elevation data covering the northern portion of the Gawler Craton. In total, 1.66 million line km were planned over an area of 295,000 km2, covering approximately 30% of the state of South Australia. The survey design of 200 m spaced lines at a ground clearance of 60 m can be compared with the design of existing regional surveys which generally employed 400 m line spacing and a ground clearance of 80 m. The new survey design results in ~2 x the data coverage and ~25% closer to the ground when compared to previous standards for regional surveys in South Australia. Due to the enormous scale of the survey, the data were acquired using four contractors who employed ten systems to fly the sixteen blocks. To standardise the data from the multitude of systems, Geoscience Australia (GA) employed a comprehensive set of technical specifications. As part of these specifications the contractors were required to fly each of the ten systems over a series of test lines termed the “Whyalla Test Lines” (Whyalla). The final GCAS data provide truly impressive high resolution regional scale products. These will allow more detailed geological interpretation of the prospective Gawler Craton. A laser altimeter was added to the list of required survey equipment. Deficiencies in the technical specifications relating to laser altimeters were identified. Standards and procedures specific to laser characteristics will need to be considered on future surveys. Analyses show that weaknesses in current standards and procedures are still evident. The weaknesses identified allow room for improvements to be made for future surveys. Gamma-ray processing results raised the most serious concerns, with repeatability not achieved. Changes to standard procedures may need to be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEG Extended Abstracts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEG Extended Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEG Extended Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22020586.2019.12073168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南澳大利亚地质调查局(GSSA)设计了高勒克拉通航空测量(GCAS),以提供覆盖高勒克拉通北部的高分辨率磁、伽马射线和高程数据。总共规划了166万公里的线路,覆盖了29.5万平方公里的面积,约占南澳大利亚州面积的30%。200 m线间距、60 m地间隙的测量设计,可与现有区域测量设计进行比较,一般采用400 m线间距、80 m地间隙。与南澳大利亚州以前的区域调查标准相比,新的调查设计使数据覆盖范围扩大了2倍,距离地面近了25%。由于调查的规模巨大,数据是由四个承包商获得的,他们使用了十个系统来飞行16个区块。为了使来自众多系统的数据标准化,澳大利亚地球科学(GA)采用了一套全面的技术规范。作为这些规范的一部分,承包商被要求在一系列被称为“Whyalla测试线”(Whyalla)的测试线上飞行10个系统中的每一个。最终的GCAS数据提供了真正令人印象深刻的高分辨率区域尺度产品。这将有助于对未来的高勒克拉通进行更详细的地质解释。在必需的测量设备清单上增加了一台激光测高仪。确定了与激光高度计有关的技术规范中的缺陷。在今后的调查中需要考虑激光特性的具体标准和程序。分析表明,现行标准和程序的弱点仍然很明显。已查明的弱点为今后的调查提供了改进的余地。伽马射线处理结果引起了最严重的关注,无法实现可重复性。可能需要考虑改变标准程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learnings from the Gawler Craton airborne survey quality control
Summary The Geological Survey of South Australia (GSSA) designed the Gawler Craton Airborne Survey (GCAS) to provide high resolution magnetic, gamma-ray and elevation data covering the northern portion of the Gawler Craton. In total, 1.66 million line km were planned over an area of 295,000 km2, covering approximately 30% of the state of South Australia. The survey design of 200 m spaced lines at a ground clearance of 60 m can be compared with the design of existing regional surveys which generally employed 400 m line spacing and a ground clearance of 80 m. The new survey design results in ~2 x the data coverage and ~25% closer to the ground when compared to previous standards for regional surveys in South Australia. Due to the enormous scale of the survey, the data were acquired using four contractors who employed ten systems to fly the sixteen blocks. To standardise the data from the multitude of systems, Geoscience Australia (GA) employed a comprehensive set of technical specifications. As part of these specifications the contractors were required to fly each of the ten systems over a series of test lines termed the “Whyalla Test Lines” (Whyalla). The final GCAS data provide truly impressive high resolution regional scale products. These will allow more detailed geological interpretation of the prospective Gawler Craton. A laser altimeter was added to the list of required survey equipment. Deficiencies in the technical specifications relating to laser altimeters were identified. Standards and procedures specific to laser characteristics will need to be considered on future surveys. Analyses show that weaknesses in current standards and procedures are still evident. The weaknesses identified allow room for improvements to be made for future surveys. Gamma-ray processing results raised the most serious concerns, with repeatability not achieved. Changes to standard procedures may need to be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Forrestania and Nepean electromagnetic test ranges, Western Australia – a comparison of airborne systems Smart stitching: adding lateral priors to ensemble inversions as a post-processing step X-ray computerised tomography for fracture and facies characterisation and slab orientation in cores stored within aluminium tubes Geophysical characterization of the remanent anomaly in the Paleo/Mesoproteozoic Araí Intracontinental Rift, Brazil Viability of long-short term memory neural networks for seismic refraction first break detection – a preliminary study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1