应用计算机化方法进行共因故障分析:Mocus-Bacfire beta因子(MOBB)代码

Carolyn D. Heising, Diane M. Luciani
{"title":"应用计算机化方法进行共因故障分析:Mocus-Bacfire beta因子(MOBB)代码","authors":"Carolyn D. Heising,&nbsp;Diane M. Luciani","doi":"10.1016/0143-8174(87)90043-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A fault tree analysis and qualitative common cause failure analysis of a power distribution box system was performed utilizing the Mocus-Bacfire Beta Factor (MOBB) code developed previously. This paper illustrates the advantages of this method over other available common cause procedures. This study indicates that the accepted use of the rare event approximation in performing fault tree analysis may lead to underestimates of risk by neglecting common cause dependencies. These dependencies have been fully modelled here, where it is shown that the error factor for the total system failure rate is high when common cause failures dominate random failures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101070,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 193-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-8174(87)90043-6","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a computerized methodology for performing common cause failure analysis: The Mocus-Bacfire beta factor (MOBB) code\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn D. Heising,&nbsp;Diane M. Luciani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0143-8174(87)90043-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A fault tree analysis and qualitative common cause failure analysis of a power distribution box system was performed utilizing the Mocus-Bacfire Beta Factor (MOBB) code developed previously. This paper illustrates the advantages of this method over other available common cause procedures. This study indicates that the accepted use of the rare event approximation in performing fault tree analysis may lead to underestimates of risk by neglecting common cause dependencies. These dependencies have been fully modelled here, where it is shown that the error factor for the total system failure rate is high when common cause failures dominate random failures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 193-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-8174(87)90043-6\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143817487900436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143817487900436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

利用先前开发的mous - bacfire Beta Factor (MOBB)代码对某配电箱系统进行了故障树分析和定性共因故障分析。本文阐述了该方法相对于其他可用的共因程序的优点。本研究表明,在进行故障树分析时,被接受的罕见事件近似的使用可能会由于忽略共同原因依赖而导致风险的低估。这些依赖关系在这里已经完全建模,其中显示,当常见原因故障占随机故障的主导地位时,总系统故障率的错误因子很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of a computerized methodology for performing common cause failure analysis: The Mocus-Bacfire beta factor (MOBB) code

A fault tree analysis and qualitative common cause failure analysis of a power distribution box system was performed utilizing the Mocus-Bacfire Beta Factor (MOBB) code developed previously. This paper illustrates the advantages of this method over other available common cause procedures. This study indicates that the accepted use of the rare event approximation in performing fault tree analysis may lead to underestimates of risk by neglecting common cause dependencies. These dependencies have been fully modelled here, where it is shown that the error factor for the total system failure rate is high when common cause failures dominate random failures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APPENDIX C: OPTIMUM ARRANGEMENT OF COMPONENTS IN CONSECUTIVE‐2‐OUT‐OF‐ N : F SYSTEMS APPENDIX A: GAMMA TABLE APPENDIX H: COMPUTER LISTING OF THE NEWTON–RAPHSON METHOD APPENDIX B: COMPUTER PROGRAM TO CALCULATE THE RELIABILITY OF A CONSECUTIVE‐ k ‐OUT‐OF‐ n : F SYSTEM SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1