仿制药莫那匹拉韦在健康志愿者体内的生物等效性研究

V. Vasilyuk, A. Boroduleva, P. Sobolev, A. Nikiforova, V. G. Mozgovaya, O. Filon, A. Zinkovskaya, V. G. Ignatiev, M. Samsonov, I. S. Kozlova, E. K. Khanonina
{"title":"仿制药莫那匹拉韦在健康志愿者体内的生物等效性研究","authors":"V. Vasilyuk, A. Boroduleva, P. Sobolev, A. Nikiforova, V. G. Mozgovaya, O. Filon, A. Zinkovskaya, V. G. Ignatiev, M. Samsonov, I. S. Kozlova, E. K. Khanonina","doi":"10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-6-562-572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Molnupiravir is one of the drugs for the etiotropic therapy of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. It has confirmed its clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate COVID-19, including those who are at high risk of progressing to severe disease.The aim of the study was to evaluate bioequivalence of the generic drug molnupiravir ALARIO-TL and the original drug Lagevrio with a single oral administration in healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. This bioequivalence study was an open, randomized, two-period crossover study. In each of the two periods, volunteers received a single dose of the test drug, or reference drug molnupiravir, in the form of capsules at the dose of 200 mg. The washout period between the doses was 3 days. To determine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and bioequivalence, the concentration the concentration of N-hydrozycytidine (NHC), the main molnupiravir metabolit in the blood plasma of volunteers was evaluated. The blood plasma sampling was carried out in the range from 0 to 16 hours in each of the study periods. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of AUC(0–16) and Cmax of the test drug and reference drugs with the established equivalence limits of 80.00 – 125.00%.Results. A total of 28 healthy male volunteers were included in the study. According to the results of the statistical analysis, after the administration of the test and reference drugs, the 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of AUC (0–16) and Cmax were 96.31% – 113.64% and 91.37% – 114.8%, respectively. These intervals fit within the established limits of 80.00–125.00%, which confirms the bioequivalence of the drugs. When comparing the frequency of the individual adverse events registration, no significant differences were found out after the administration of the test and reference drugs.Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the test and reference drugs of molnupiravir are bioequivalent. In addition, the data obtained indicate that the drugs have similar safety profiles.","PeriodicalId":20031,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology & Pharmacy","volume":"70 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY OF GENERIC MOLNUPIRAVIR IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS\",\"authors\":\"V. Vasilyuk, A. Boroduleva, P. Sobolev, A. Nikiforova, V. G. Mozgovaya, O. Filon, A. Zinkovskaya, V. G. Ignatiev, M. Samsonov, I. S. Kozlova, E. K. Khanonina\",\"doi\":\"10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-6-562-572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Molnupiravir is one of the drugs for the etiotropic therapy of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. It has confirmed its clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate COVID-19, including those who are at high risk of progressing to severe disease.The aim of the study was to evaluate bioequivalence of the generic drug molnupiravir ALARIO-TL and the original drug Lagevrio with a single oral administration in healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. This bioequivalence study was an open, randomized, two-period crossover study. In each of the two periods, volunteers received a single dose of the test drug, or reference drug molnupiravir, in the form of capsules at the dose of 200 mg. The washout period between the doses was 3 days. To determine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and bioequivalence, the concentration the concentration of N-hydrozycytidine (NHC), the main molnupiravir metabolit in the blood plasma of volunteers was evaluated. The blood plasma sampling was carried out in the range from 0 to 16 hours in each of the study periods. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of AUC(0–16) and Cmax of the test drug and reference drugs with the established equivalence limits of 80.00 – 125.00%.Results. A total of 28 healthy male volunteers were included in the study. According to the results of the statistical analysis, after the administration of the test and reference drugs, the 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of AUC (0–16) and Cmax were 96.31% – 113.64% and 91.37% – 114.8%, respectively. These intervals fit within the established limits of 80.00–125.00%, which confirms the bioequivalence of the drugs. When comparing the frequency of the individual adverse events registration, no significant differences were found out after the administration of the test and reference drugs.Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the test and reference drugs of molnupiravir are bioequivalent. In addition, the data obtained indicate that the drugs have similar safety profiles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacology & Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"70 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacology & Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-6-562-572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology & Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2022-10-6-562-572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

莫努匹拉韦是治疗新型冠状病毒感染COVID-19的致病因药物之一。对轻、中度新冠肺炎患者,包括发展为重症的高危人群的临床疗效得到了证实。本研究的目的是评价仿制药molnupiravir ALARIO-TL与原研药Lagevrio单次口服在健康志愿者中的生物等效性。材料和方法。这项生物等效性研究是一项开放、随机、两期交叉研究。在这两个阶段的每一个阶段,志愿者们都服用了一剂200毫克的胶囊形式的测试药物,或参考药物莫努皮拉韦。两次给药之间的洗脱期为3天。为了确定药代动力学(PK)参数和生物等效性,测定了志愿者血浆中莫诺匹拉韦主要代谢产物n -氢胞苷(NHC)的浓度。在每个研究周期的0 - 16小时范围内进行血浆采样。通过比较受试药与参比药AUC几何平均值(0 ~ 16)与Cmax比值的90%置信区间(ci),确定等效限为80.00 ~ 125.00%,评价生物等效性。共有28名健康男性志愿者参与了这项研究。统计分析结果显示,给药后,AUC(0-16)几何均数与Cmax比值的90% ci分别为96.31% ~ 113.64%和91.37% ~ 114.8%。这些间隔符合80.00-125.00%的既定限度,这证实了药物的生物等效性。在比较个体不良事件登记频率时,试验用药与对照用药后的不良事件登记频率无显著差异。根据本研究的结果,可以得出莫诺匹拉韦的试验药与参比药具有生物等效性。此外,获得的数据表明,这两种药物具有相似的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY OF GENERIC MOLNUPIRAVIR IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
Molnupiravir is one of the drugs for the etiotropic therapy of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. It has confirmed its clinical efficacy in the treatment of patients with mild and moderate COVID-19, including those who are at high risk of progressing to severe disease.The aim of the study was to evaluate bioequivalence of the generic drug molnupiravir ALARIO-TL and the original drug Lagevrio with a single oral administration in healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. This bioequivalence study was an open, randomized, two-period crossover study. In each of the two periods, volunteers received a single dose of the test drug, or reference drug molnupiravir, in the form of capsules at the dose of 200 mg. The washout period between the doses was 3 days. To determine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and bioequivalence, the concentration the concentration of N-hydrozycytidine (NHC), the main molnupiravir metabolit in the blood plasma of volunteers was evaluated. The blood plasma sampling was carried out in the range from 0 to 16 hours in each of the study periods. Bioequivalence was assessed by comparing 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric means of AUC(0–16) and Cmax of the test drug and reference drugs with the established equivalence limits of 80.00 – 125.00%.Results. A total of 28 healthy male volunteers were included in the study. According to the results of the statistical analysis, after the administration of the test and reference drugs, the 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of AUC (0–16) and Cmax were 96.31% – 113.64% and 91.37% – 114.8%, respectively. These intervals fit within the established limits of 80.00–125.00%, which confirms the bioequivalence of the drugs. When comparing the frequency of the individual adverse events registration, no significant differences were found out after the administration of the test and reference drugs.Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the test and reference drugs of molnupiravir are bioequivalent. In addition, the data obtained indicate that the drugs have similar safety profiles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative determination of total flavonoids in Glycyrrhiza Glabra L. herbs New role of extemporaneous manufacturing in regulating drug products access onto the market “Off-label” drugs: legal problems and socio-economic aspects of application practice Analysis of cytokine response characteristics and immunopathogenetic effects of double-stranded sodium salt RNA-based drug for postexposure prophylaxis against novel coronavirus infection: double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Development of composition and technology for obtaining antimicrobial composition based on mono- and sesquiterpenoids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1