用AutoCAD软件评价金属托架去除后的粘结剂残留指数

Adriana Arbutina, Marijana Arapović-Savić, Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, I. Radman, Saša Marin
{"title":"用AutoCAD软件评价金属托架去除后的粘结剂残留指数","authors":"Adriana Arbutina, Marijana Arapović-Savić, Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, I. Radman, Saša Marin","doi":"10.2478/sdj-2018-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Introduction After the completion of treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances, it is necessary to remove the brackets and bands from teeth using an appropriate method. The aim of this study was to determine the most common way of bond failure between teeth and metal brackets, as well as to compare bond failure between the brackets and upper and lower premolars. Material and Method Metal brackets were bonded with Aspire composite material on 154 human premolars, extracted for orthodontic purposes. After debonding, the surface of remaining adhesive on the teeth and brackets was measured. Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to estimate bond failure between teeth and metal brackets. Results The average size of remaining adhesive surface after removing brackets from the upper premolars was 12.06 mm2, while it was 9.32 mm2 on the lower premolars. The average size of the remaining adhesive surface area on the brackets removed from the upper premolars was 0.37 mm2, while it was 2.08 mm2 on the brackets removed from lower premolars. A statistically significant difference was found between these values. The most common score of ARIteeth was 3 (85.71%) and the most frequent score of ARIbrackets was 0 (85.71%). Conclusion The most common way of bond failure between teeth and metal brackets was between the bracket base and adhesive surface. A statistically significant difference was found between the values of the size of residual adhesive surface on the upper and lower premolars as well as on the brackets debonded from them.","PeriodicalId":52984,"journal":{"name":"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije","volume":"75 1","pages":"22 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Adhesive Remnant Index after metal brackets removal using AutoCAD software\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Arbutina, Marijana Arapović-Savić, Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, I. Radman, Saša Marin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sdj-2018-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Introduction After the completion of treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances, it is necessary to remove the brackets and bands from teeth using an appropriate method. The aim of this study was to determine the most common way of bond failure between teeth and metal brackets, as well as to compare bond failure between the brackets and upper and lower premolars. Material and Method Metal brackets were bonded with Aspire composite material on 154 human premolars, extracted for orthodontic purposes. After debonding, the surface of remaining adhesive on the teeth and brackets was measured. Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to estimate bond failure between teeth and metal brackets. Results The average size of remaining adhesive surface after removing brackets from the upper premolars was 12.06 mm2, while it was 9.32 mm2 on the lower premolars. The average size of the remaining adhesive surface area on the brackets removed from the upper premolars was 0.37 mm2, while it was 2.08 mm2 on the brackets removed from lower premolars. A statistically significant difference was found between these values. The most common score of ARIteeth was 3 (85.71%) and the most frequent score of ARIbrackets was 0 (85.71%). Conclusion The most common way of bond failure between teeth and metal brackets was between the bracket base and adhesive surface. A statistically significant difference was found between the values of the size of residual adhesive surface on the upper and lower premolars as well as on the brackets debonded from them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

固定矫治器治疗完成后,需要用合适的方法将托槽和托带从牙齿上取下。本研究的目的是确定牙齿与金属托槽之间最常见的粘结破坏方式,并比较托槽与上、下前磨牙之间的粘结破坏。材料与方法将金属托槽与Aspire复合材料粘接在154颗拔除用于正畸的人类前磨牙上。脱粘后,测量牙齿和托槽表面的剩余粘接剂。用粘接残余指数(ARI)评价牙与金属托槽之间的粘接破坏。结果上前磨牙拔除托槽后剩余粘接面平均为12.06 mm2,下前磨牙平均为9.32 mm2。上前磨牙托槽取下后剩余粘接面积平均为0.37 mm2,下前磨牙托槽取下后剩余粘接面积平均为2.08 mm2。这些值之间存在统计学上的显著差异。最常见的评分为3分(85.71%),最常见的评分为0分(85.71%)。结论牙与金属托槽粘结失效最常见的方式是托槽基与粘接面之间的粘结失效。上、下前磨牙及脱牙托槽残余粘接面大小差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Adhesive Remnant Index after metal brackets removal using AutoCAD software
Summary Introduction After the completion of treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances, it is necessary to remove the brackets and bands from teeth using an appropriate method. The aim of this study was to determine the most common way of bond failure between teeth and metal brackets, as well as to compare bond failure between the brackets and upper and lower premolars. Material and Method Metal brackets were bonded with Aspire composite material on 154 human premolars, extracted for orthodontic purposes. After debonding, the surface of remaining adhesive on the teeth and brackets was measured. Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to estimate bond failure between teeth and metal brackets. Results The average size of remaining adhesive surface after removing brackets from the upper premolars was 12.06 mm2, while it was 9.32 mm2 on the lower premolars. The average size of the remaining adhesive surface area on the brackets removed from the upper premolars was 0.37 mm2, while it was 2.08 mm2 on the brackets removed from lower premolars. A statistically significant difference was found between these values. The most common score of ARIteeth was 3 (85.71%) and the most frequent score of ARIbrackets was 0 (85.71%). Conclusion The most common way of bond failure between teeth and metal brackets was between the bracket base and adhesive surface. A statistically significant difference was found between the values of the size of residual adhesive surface on the upper and lower premolars as well as on the brackets debonded from them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An influence of finishing procedures and protective coating on the ultrastructure of conventional and hybrid glass ionomer cement restorations Examination of the presence of periodontitis and gingivitis in rats with induced diabetes mellitus Condylographic evaluation of propulsive and Bennett angles in patients with temporomandibular disorders Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments of different diameters Oral health behavior and oral hygiene habits of elderly population in Podgorica, Montenegro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1