{"title":"碳酸钠与碳酸铵处理废锂离子电池粉尘浸出液中Li(I)析出的比较","authors":"Thi Thu Huong Nguyen, Man-Seung Lee","doi":"10.7844/kirr.2022.31.5.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smelting reduction of spent lithium-ion batteries results in metallic alloys, slag, and dust containing Li(I). Precipitation of Li 2 CO 3 was performed using the synthetic leachate of the dust. Herein, the effects of the precipitant and addition of non-aqueous solvents on the precipitation of Li(I) were investigated. Na 2 CO 3 was a more effective precipitating agent than (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 owing to the hydrolysis reaction of dissolved ammonium and carbonate. The addition of acetone or ethanol improved the Li(I) precipitation percentage for both the precipitants. When using (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 , the Li(I) precipitation percentage increased at a solution pH of 12. Under the same conditions, the Li(I) precipitation percentage using Na 2 CO 3 was much higher than that using (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 .","PeriodicalId":20967,"journal":{"name":"Resources Recycling","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Li(I) Precipitation from the Leaching Solution of the Dust from Spent Lithium-ion Batteries Treatment between Sodium Carbonate and Ammonium Carbonate\",\"authors\":\"Thi Thu Huong Nguyen, Man-Seung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.7844/kirr.2022.31.5.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Smelting reduction of spent lithium-ion batteries results in metallic alloys, slag, and dust containing Li(I). Precipitation of Li 2 CO 3 was performed using the synthetic leachate of the dust. Herein, the effects of the precipitant and addition of non-aqueous solvents on the precipitation of Li(I) were investigated. Na 2 CO 3 was a more effective precipitating agent than (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 owing to the hydrolysis reaction of dissolved ammonium and carbonate. The addition of acetone or ethanol improved the Li(I) precipitation percentage for both the precipitants. When using (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 , the Li(I) precipitation percentage increased at a solution pH of 12. Under the same conditions, the Li(I) precipitation percentage using Na 2 CO 3 was much higher than that using (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":20967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Recycling\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7844/kirr.2022.31.5.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7844/kirr.2022.31.5.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
废锂离子电池的熔炼还原产生含Li(I)的金属合金、炉渣和粉尘。利用粉尘的合成渗滤液对Li 2 CO 3进行了沉淀。本文研究了沉淀剂和非水溶剂的加入对Li(I)沉淀的影响。na2co3是一种比(nh4) 2co3更有效的沉淀剂,因为溶解的铵与碳酸盐发生了水解反应。丙酮或乙醇的加入提高了两种沉淀剂的Li(I)析出率。当使用(nh4) 2co3时,溶液pH为12时,Li(I)的析出率增加。在相同条件下,na2co3的Li(I)析出率远高于(nh4) 2co3。
Comparison of Li(I) Precipitation from the Leaching Solution of the Dust from Spent Lithium-ion Batteries Treatment between Sodium Carbonate and Ammonium Carbonate
Smelting reduction of spent lithium-ion batteries results in metallic alloys, slag, and dust containing Li(I). Precipitation of Li 2 CO 3 was performed using the synthetic leachate of the dust. Herein, the effects of the precipitant and addition of non-aqueous solvents on the precipitation of Li(I) were investigated. Na 2 CO 3 was a more effective precipitating agent than (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 owing to the hydrolysis reaction of dissolved ammonium and carbonate. The addition of acetone or ethanol improved the Li(I) precipitation percentage for both the precipitants. When using (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 , the Li(I) precipitation percentage increased at a solution pH of 12. Under the same conditions, the Li(I) precipitation percentage using Na 2 CO 3 was much higher than that using (NH 4 ) 2 CO 3 .