疼痛性神经病变:普瑞巴林和阿米替林安全性的比较观察分析

Shilpa Shukla, Arkapal Bandyopadhyay, Sumit Kumar, G. Vardhan, B. Goel, C. Choudhary, R. Kant, P. Dhamija
{"title":"疼痛性神经病变:普瑞巴林和阿米替林安全性的比较观察分析","authors":"Shilpa Shukla, Arkapal Bandyopadhyay, Sumit Kumar, G. Vardhan, B. Goel, C. Choudhary, R. Kant, P. Dhamija","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20212380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic neuropathic pain, caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system is a common debilitating condition in clinical practice. Pregabalin and Amitriptyline are most commonly used drugs for its management. The aim of the study was to study the safety of Pregabalin and Amitriptyline in chronic neuropathic pain.Methods: Prospective observational study at Department of Medicine and Orthopaedics at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. Newly diagnosed patients of neuropathic pain who were prescribed either Pregabalin or Amitriptyline were included in the study. Patients were followed up telephonically or during routine visits for a period of 3 months after initiation of any of these drugs. Appropriate measures of central tendency were used to describe demographic and clinical parameters and Correlation test was used between different variables and occurrence of adverse drug reactions.Results: 317 patients were prescribed these drugs. A total of 276 ADRs were observed (128 with Pregabalin and 148 with Amitriptyline). Central nervous system symptoms like sedation and dizziness were most commonly present in both the groups. Diabetes mellitus (47.1%) was most common etiology for neuropathic pain. Causality assessment showed probable association with Amitriptyline (n=140) and Pregabalin (n=118). Majority of ADRs with Amitriptyline group (49.32%) were moderate in severity whereas it was mild with Pregabalin (59.7%). A weak positive correlation (R=0.273) was seen with number of ADRs occurrence and total drug exposure in patients taking Pregabalin whereas a weak negative correlation (R=-0.623) was seen in Amitriptyline treated group.Conclusions: Safety profile of Pregabalin was better than Amitriptyline in the present study. The study findings must be replicated in larger patient population and for a prolonged duration for better understanding of the pattern of adverse drug reactions. ","PeriodicalId":13901,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Painful neuropathy: comparative observational analysis of safety profile of pregabalin and amitriptyline\",\"authors\":\"Shilpa Shukla, Arkapal Bandyopadhyay, Sumit Kumar, G. Vardhan, B. Goel, C. Choudhary, R. Kant, P. Dhamija\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20212380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chronic neuropathic pain, caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system is a common debilitating condition in clinical practice. Pregabalin and Amitriptyline are most commonly used drugs for its management. The aim of the study was to study the safety of Pregabalin and Amitriptyline in chronic neuropathic pain.Methods: Prospective observational study at Department of Medicine and Orthopaedics at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. Newly diagnosed patients of neuropathic pain who were prescribed either Pregabalin or Amitriptyline were included in the study. Patients were followed up telephonically or during routine visits for a period of 3 months after initiation of any of these drugs. Appropriate measures of central tendency were used to describe demographic and clinical parameters and Correlation test was used between different variables and occurrence of adverse drug reactions.Results: 317 patients were prescribed these drugs. A total of 276 ADRs were observed (128 with Pregabalin and 148 with Amitriptyline). Central nervous system symptoms like sedation and dizziness were most commonly present in both the groups. Diabetes mellitus (47.1%) was most common etiology for neuropathic pain. Causality assessment showed probable association with Amitriptyline (n=140) and Pregabalin (n=118). Majority of ADRs with Amitriptyline group (49.32%) were moderate in severity whereas it was mild with Pregabalin (59.7%). A weak positive correlation (R=0.273) was seen with number of ADRs occurrence and total drug exposure in patients taking Pregabalin whereas a weak negative correlation (R=-0.623) was seen in Amitriptyline treated group.Conclusions: Safety profile of Pregabalin was better than Amitriptyline in the present study. The study findings must be replicated in larger patient population and for a prolonged duration for better understanding of the pattern of adverse drug reactions. \",\"PeriodicalId\":13901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20212380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20212380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由体感觉神经系统病变引起的慢性神经性疼痛是临床实践中常见的衰弱性疾病。普瑞巴林和阿米替林是最常用的治疗药物。本研究的目的是研究普瑞巴林和阿米替林治疗慢性神经性疼痛的安全性。方法:前瞻性观察研究在瑞诗凯什全印度医学科学研究所医学和骨科。新诊断的神经性疼痛患者使用普瑞巴林或阿米替林进行研究。在开始使用这些药物后的3个月内,对患者进行电话或常规随访。采用适当的集中趋势度量来描述人口学和临床参数,并对不同变量与药物不良反应的发生进行相关性检验。结果:317例患者使用了该药。共观察到276例不良反应(普瑞巴林128例,阿米替林148例)。镇静和头晕等中枢神经系统症状在两组患者中最常见。糖尿病(47.1%)是神经性疼痛最常见的病因。因果关系评估显示可能与阿米替林(n=140)和普瑞巴林(n=118)有关。阿米替林组大多数不良反应严重程度为中度(49.32%),普瑞巴林组为轻度(59.7%)。普瑞巴林组不良反应发生次数与总药物暴露呈弱正相关(R=0.273),阿米替林组不良反应发生次数与总药物暴露呈弱负相关(R=-0.623)。结论:普瑞巴林在本研究中的安全性优于阿米替林。为了更好地了解药物不良反应的模式,研究结果必须在更大的患者群体和更长的时间内得到重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Painful neuropathy: comparative observational analysis of safety profile of pregabalin and amitriptyline
Background: Chronic neuropathic pain, caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system is a common debilitating condition in clinical practice. Pregabalin and Amitriptyline are most commonly used drugs for its management. The aim of the study was to study the safety of Pregabalin and Amitriptyline in chronic neuropathic pain.Methods: Prospective observational study at Department of Medicine and Orthopaedics at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh. Newly diagnosed patients of neuropathic pain who were prescribed either Pregabalin or Amitriptyline were included in the study. Patients were followed up telephonically or during routine visits for a period of 3 months after initiation of any of these drugs. Appropriate measures of central tendency were used to describe demographic and clinical parameters and Correlation test was used between different variables and occurrence of adverse drug reactions.Results: 317 patients were prescribed these drugs. A total of 276 ADRs were observed (128 with Pregabalin and 148 with Amitriptyline). Central nervous system symptoms like sedation and dizziness were most commonly present in both the groups. Diabetes mellitus (47.1%) was most common etiology for neuropathic pain. Causality assessment showed probable association with Amitriptyline (n=140) and Pregabalin (n=118). Majority of ADRs with Amitriptyline group (49.32%) were moderate in severity whereas it was mild with Pregabalin (59.7%). A weak positive correlation (R=0.273) was seen with number of ADRs occurrence and total drug exposure in patients taking Pregabalin whereas a weak negative correlation (R=-0.623) was seen in Amitriptyline treated group.Conclusions: Safety profile of Pregabalin was better than Amitriptyline in the present study. The study findings must be replicated in larger patient population and for a prolonged duration for better understanding of the pattern of adverse drug reactions. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status of calcitonin gene-related peptide-based therapies in migraine: a scoping review Efficacy of current treatments against hepatitis C virus Adverse drug reactions to first line anti-tuberculosis drugs in newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients Comparing the effect of statins on hepatic fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in Wistar rats Prescription audit of antihypertensive drugs used in stroke patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1