{"title":"考察地理标志的发展","authors":"Mirna de L. Medeiros, João L. Passador","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Geographical indications (GIs) are distinctive signs used on goods or services, the reputation or characteristic of which arises from their origin. Examples are Champagne, Darjeeling, Canastra, among others. They were created to prevent fraud, but they can serve and have been used by scholars, governments, and entities as an instrument for development. To discover the components of the development resulting from registration of GI, we conducted an integrative literature review regarding GIs and development. We found 122 articles (ScienceDirect: 38 and ISI Web of Science: 84) which was reduced to 81 following verification by content analysis. The elements constituting this development were understood as consequence of actions and conditions prior and subsequent to recognition of GI. The proposed new synthesis linked these issues with both positive and negative effects. Based on these relationships, it is evident that development is not an immediate consequence of registration, it depends on a series of factors (of which public support, producer engagement, and consumer recognition stand out) and to what extent they are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"25 1","pages":"86-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12208","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the development attributed to geographical indications\",\"authors\":\"Mirna de L. Medeiros, João L. Passador\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Geographical indications (GIs) are distinctive signs used on goods or services, the reputation or characteristic of which arises from their origin. Examples are Champagne, Darjeeling, Canastra, among others. They were created to prevent fraud, but they can serve and have been used by scholars, governments, and entities as an instrument for development. To discover the components of the development resulting from registration of GI, we conducted an integrative literature review regarding GIs and development. We found 122 articles (ScienceDirect: 38 and ISI Web of Science: 84) which was reduced to 81 following verification by content analysis. The elements constituting this development were understood as consequence of actions and conditions prior and subsequent to recognition of GI. The proposed new synthesis linked these issues with both positive and negative effects. Based on these relationships, it is evident that development is not an immediate consequence of registration, it depends on a series of factors (of which public support, producer engagement, and consumer recognition stand out) and to what extent they are present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"86-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12208\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
地理标志(GIs)是用于商品或服务的显著标志,其声誉或特征源于其来源。比如香槟、大吉岭、加那斯特拉等等。它们的创建是为了防止欺诈,但它们可以服务于学者、政府和实体,并已被它们用作促进发展的工具。为了发现地理标志注册所带来的发展的组成部分,我们对地理标志与发展进行了综合文献综述。我们发现了122篇文章(ScienceDirect: 38篇,ISI Web of Science: 84篇),经过内容分析验证后减少到81篇。构成这一发展的要素被理解为在地理标志被承认之前和之后的行动和条件的结果。拟议的新综合将这些问题与积极和消极的影响联系起来。基于这些关系,很明显,发展不是注册的直接结果,它取决于一系列因素(其中公众支持,生产者参与和消费者认可突出)以及它们存在的程度。
Examining the development attributed to geographical indications
Geographical indications (GIs) are distinctive signs used on goods or services, the reputation or characteristic of which arises from their origin. Examples are Champagne, Darjeeling, Canastra, among others. They were created to prevent fraud, but they can serve and have been used by scholars, governments, and entities as an instrument for development. To discover the components of the development resulting from registration of GI, we conducted an integrative literature review regarding GIs and development. We found 122 articles (ScienceDirect: 38 and ISI Web of Science: 84) which was reduced to 81 following verification by content analysis. The elements constituting this development were understood as consequence of actions and conditions prior and subsequent to recognition of GI. The proposed new synthesis linked these issues with both positive and negative effects. Based on these relationships, it is evident that development is not an immediate consequence of registration, it depends on a series of factors (of which public support, producer engagement, and consumer recognition stand out) and to what extent they are present.