收益公告中交易量的不对称决定因素

Alina Lerman, Qin Tan
{"title":"收益公告中交易量的不对称决定因素","authors":"Alina Lerman, Qin Tan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3310682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accounting literature offers three possible determinants of informationally driven trading volume at earnings announcements: differential interpretation of public news, pre-announcement difference in beliefs, and signal strength. We empirically test, conditional on the level of earnings news, which determinant best explains earnings announcement volume. First, consistent with the notion that differential interpretation by itself without a change in the mean of investor valuations (a typical metric of signal strength) is unlikely to drive volume, we document a strong association between volume and signed contemporaneous stock returns. We also show that, at all levels of earnings news, trading volume is most consistently associated with proxies of signal strength. However, we predict and find that volume also reflects differential interpretation for bad news but not for good news due to short sale dynamics. We confirm this asymmetry by observing a decrease in trading volume only for bad news firms after an exogenous reduction in investor disagreement, the staggered EDGAR implementation. Lastly, we find that proxies for the third determinant, pre-announcement belief difference, are the least significant in explaining trading volume. Overall, our results suggest that trading volume at earnings announcements is most reflective of the quantity and quality of information released, but its dynamics vary considerably with the nature of the disclosed news.","PeriodicalId":18611,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric Determinants of Trading Volume at Earnings Announcements\",\"authors\":\"Alina Lerman, Qin Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3310682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accounting literature offers three possible determinants of informationally driven trading volume at earnings announcements: differential interpretation of public news, pre-announcement difference in beliefs, and signal strength. We empirically test, conditional on the level of earnings news, which determinant best explains earnings announcement volume. First, consistent with the notion that differential interpretation by itself without a change in the mean of investor valuations (a typical metric of signal strength) is unlikely to drive volume, we document a strong association between volume and signed contemporaneous stock returns. We also show that, at all levels of earnings news, trading volume is most consistently associated with proxies of signal strength. However, we predict and find that volume also reflects differential interpretation for bad news but not for good news due to short sale dynamics. We confirm this asymmetry by observing a decrease in trading volume only for bad news firms after an exogenous reduction in investor disagreement, the staggered EDGAR implementation. Lastly, we find that proxies for the third determinant, pre-announcement belief difference, are the least significant in explaining trading volume. Overall, our results suggest that trading volume at earnings announcements is most reflective of the quantity and quality of information released, but its dynamics vary considerably with the nature of the disclosed news.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3310682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3310682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

会计文献提供了三个可能的决定因素信息驱动的交易量在收益公告:不同的公共新闻的解释,在公告前的信念差异,和信号强度。我们通过实证检验,以盈余新闻的水平为条件,哪个决定因素最能解释盈余公告的数量。首先,与不改变投资者估值平均值(信号强度的典型指标)的差异解释本身不太可能推动交易量的概念一致,我们记录了交易量与签署的同期股票回报之间的强烈关联。我们还表明,在所有级别的收益消息中,交易量最一致地与信号强度的代理相关。然而,我们预测并发现,由于卖空动态,成交量也反映了对坏消息的不同解释,而不是对好消息的不同解释。我们通过观察坏消息公司在外部投资者分歧减少(交错EDGAR实施)后交易量的减少,证实了这种不对称性。最后,我们发现第三个决定因素的代理,即公告前信念差异,在解释交易量方面最不显著。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,收益公告时的交易量最能反映所发布信息的数量和质量,但其动态变化与披露新闻的性质有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asymmetric Determinants of Trading Volume at Earnings Announcements
Accounting literature offers three possible determinants of informationally driven trading volume at earnings announcements: differential interpretation of public news, pre-announcement difference in beliefs, and signal strength. We empirically test, conditional on the level of earnings news, which determinant best explains earnings announcement volume. First, consistent with the notion that differential interpretation by itself without a change in the mean of investor valuations (a typical metric of signal strength) is unlikely to drive volume, we document a strong association between volume and signed contemporaneous stock returns. We also show that, at all levels of earnings news, trading volume is most consistently associated with proxies of signal strength. However, we predict and find that volume also reflects differential interpretation for bad news but not for good news due to short sale dynamics. We confirm this asymmetry by observing a decrease in trading volume only for bad news firms after an exogenous reduction in investor disagreement, the staggered EDGAR implementation. Lastly, we find that proxies for the third determinant, pre-announcement belief difference, are the least significant in explaining trading volume. Overall, our results suggest that trading volume at earnings announcements is most reflective of the quantity and quality of information released, but its dynamics vary considerably with the nature of the disclosed news.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Framework for Investing with Altruism The Inviolable Law of Demand How Much Does the Market Know? Who Trades at the Close? Implications for Price Discovery and Liquidity Trade and the Rise of Ancient Greek City-States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1