超声引导坐骨神经阻滞在膝下截肢手术中的应用:臀下入路与腘窝入路

R. Hussien, D. Ibrahim, Islam Gamal Hamed Abdelnaby
{"title":"超声引导坐骨神经阻滞在膝下截肢手术中的应用:臀下入路与腘窝入路","authors":"R. Hussien, D. Ibrahim, Islam Gamal Hamed Abdelnaby","doi":"10.2174/2589645801812010019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block has been proved to be effective in pain control for lower limb surgeries, fortunately, it can be performed at different levels via different approaches.\n \n \n \n To compare the effectiveness of the sub-gluteal and the popliteal approaches of blocking the sciatic nerve as well as their success rate.\n \n \n \n After approval of the ethical committee and obtaining a written informed consent from 56 ASA II, III patients aged 45–75 year, this prospective, randomized, interventional double blinded study was done to patients undergoing elective below knee amputation.\n \n \n \n Patients were randomly assigned to receive either sciatic nerve block using a popliteal approach (group P, n 28) or a sub gluteal approach (group G, n 28). femoral nerve block done for sensory block of the medial side of the leg. Time to complete sensory and motor block, time taken to perform the block, block-related complications, block duration, time for asking for rescue analgesia in the first 24 h and both patients′ and surgeons′ level of satisfaction were recorded. Success of the block was considered when the block is solid and doesn’t require shifting to GA.\n \n \n \n Patients in the P group had a 100% success rate, shorter time to perform the block, less overall complications, required no postoperative rescue analgesia. Yet, more surgeons preferred the sub-gluteal approach.\n \n \n \n Popliteal approach is as effective as the sub-gluteal approach block providing adequate analgesia with a 100% success rate\n","PeriodicalId":22862,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided Sciatic Nerve Block in Below Knee Amputation Surgery: Sub Gluteal Versus Popliteal Approach\",\"authors\":\"R. Hussien, D. Ibrahim, Islam Gamal Hamed Abdelnaby\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2589645801812010019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block has been proved to be effective in pain control for lower limb surgeries, fortunately, it can be performed at different levels via different approaches.\\n \\n \\n \\n To compare the effectiveness of the sub-gluteal and the popliteal approaches of blocking the sciatic nerve as well as their success rate.\\n \\n \\n \\n After approval of the ethical committee and obtaining a written informed consent from 56 ASA II, III patients aged 45–75 year, this prospective, randomized, interventional double blinded study was done to patients undergoing elective below knee amputation.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients were randomly assigned to receive either sciatic nerve block using a popliteal approach (group P, n 28) or a sub gluteal approach (group G, n 28). femoral nerve block done for sensory block of the medial side of the leg. Time to complete sensory and motor block, time taken to perform the block, block-related complications, block duration, time for asking for rescue analgesia in the first 24 h and both patients′ and surgeons′ level of satisfaction were recorded. Success of the block was considered when the block is solid and doesn’t require shifting to GA.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients in the P group had a 100% success rate, shorter time to perform the block, less overall complications, required no postoperative rescue analgesia. Yet, more surgeons preferred the sub-gluteal approach.\\n \\n \\n \\n Popliteal approach is as effective as the sub-gluteal approach block providing adequate analgesia with a 100% success rate\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Anesthesia Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Anesthesia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589645801812010019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2589645801812010019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

超声引导坐骨神经阻滞已被证明是有效的下肢手术疼痛控制,幸运的是,它可以通过不同的途径在不同的水平进行。比较臀下入路与腘窝入路阻断坐骨神经的有效性及成功率。经伦理委员会批准并获得56例年龄45-75岁的ASA II、III级患者的书面知情同意后,对选择性膝下截肢患者进行了这项前瞻性、随机、介入性双盲研究。患者被随机分配接受坐骨神经阻滞,采用腘窝入路(P组,n 28)或臀下入路(G组,n 28)。小腿内侧感觉阻滞行股神经阻滞。记录完成感觉和运动阻滞的时间、阻滞时间、阻滞相关并发症、阻滞持续时间、前24 h要求抢救性镇痛的时间以及患者和外科医生的满意度。当块是固体且不需要转移到GA时,则认为块成功。P组患者成功率100%,阻滞时间短,总并发症少,术后无需抢救性镇痛。然而,更多的外科医生更喜欢臀下入路。腘窝入路与臀下入路阻断一样有效,提供足够的镇痛,成功率为100%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound-Guided Sciatic Nerve Block in Below Knee Amputation Surgery: Sub Gluteal Versus Popliteal Approach
Ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block has been proved to be effective in pain control for lower limb surgeries, fortunately, it can be performed at different levels via different approaches. To compare the effectiveness of the sub-gluteal and the popliteal approaches of blocking the sciatic nerve as well as their success rate. After approval of the ethical committee and obtaining a written informed consent from 56 ASA II, III patients aged 45–75 year, this prospective, randomized, interventional double blinded study was done to patients undergoing elective below knee amputation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either sciatic nerve block using a popliteal approach (group P, n 28) or a sub gluteal approach (group G, n 28). femoral nerve block done for sensory block of the medial side of the leg. Time to complete sensory and motor block, time taken to perform the block, block-related complications, block duration, time for asking for rescue analgesia in the first 24 h and both patients′ and surgeons′ level of satisfaction were recorded. Success of the block was considered when the block is solid and doesn’t require shifting to GA. Patients in the P group had a 100% success rate, shorter time to perform the block, less overall complications, required no postoperative rescue analgesia. Yet, more surgeons preferred the sub-gluteal approach. Popliteal approach is as effective as the sub-gluteal approach block providing adequate analgesia with a 100% success rate
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Adverse Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Intrathecal Morphine with Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Post-total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparison of Changes in the Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Post-surgery Outcomes in Child Patients with COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Breath-holding Test in the Prognosis of Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Gynecology: Observational Cohort Study Repeated Thoracic Paravertebral Blocking to Alleviate Pain Symptoms in 66-years-old Man with Post-herpetic Neuralgia: A Case Report Effect of Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine on Release of Inflammatory Mediators in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. A Randomized Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1