J KubicekGregory, K. Rachel, J RossiMatthew, S. Christian, H. Alexander, P. Melvin, A. Stephen, Khrizman Polina
{"title":"小细胞肺癌化疗起始时间的重要性","authors":"J KubicekGregory, K. Rachel, J RossiMatthew, S. Christian, H. Alexander, P. Melvin, A. Stephen, Khrizman Polina","doi":"10.23937/2378-3419/1410111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a short median survival time. Because of the rapid growth rate there may be an advantage to emergently beginning chemotherapy as soon as SCLC diagnosis is made. Methods: All SCLC patients evaluated at Cooper University Hospital from January 2011 to September 2014 were reviewed. Multiple clinical factors were analyzed including timing between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy. Results: A total of 75 patients were analyzed. On univariate analysis there was a survival detriment to early initiation of chemotherapy. With multivariate analysis the difference in survival disappeared. With logistic regression, the only variable that was related to overall survival was stage (extensive versus limited). We did not find any subset that benefited from early initiation of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Mortality and cumulative survival time were not improved by early initiation of chemotherapy for any patient subset. Only stage at diagnosis was predictive for mortality and cumulative survival. Our data appears to show that urgency in starting chemotherapy has little bearing on survival in patients diagnosed with SCLC. The data suggest that there is no detriment to a non-urgent start time for chemotherapy. time, symptomatic disease, and early development of metastatic disease [1,2]. The cellular proliferation rate is much higher in comparison to other types of lung cancer, which has contributed tothe view of newly diagnosed SCLC as an “oncologic emergency”. Some oncologists will urge the start of chemotherapy as soon as possible (sometimes within 24 hours of diagnosis) given the potential for aggressive growth and metastasis. Similarly, some institutions will keep a patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer admitted to the hospital until final pathology is available so that in the event that the final diagnosis is SCLC chemotherapy can be initiated immediately as an in-patient. The theoretical rationale for emergent start of chemotherapy is based on the perceived rapid growth rate for SCLC. Since the tumor has such rapid growth potential, earlier chemotherapy start time may allow for an increase in cure rate for limited stage patients and provide improved disease control in extensive stage patients. While there may be a theoretical benefit to early initiation of chemotherapy, there is also a downside. Emergent initiation of therapy may overwhelm patients who haven’t had time to properly process their disease status (including potentially compromising the integrity of informed consent), strain hospital systems with the costs of inpatient chemotherapy and delayed discharge, and interfere with proper disease staging. Introduction Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is aparticularly aggressive lung malignancy characterized by a rapid doubling ISSN: 2378-3419 DOI: 10.23937/2378-3419/1410111 Kubicek et al. Int J Cancer Clin Res 2019, 6:111 • Page 2 of 5 • number of pack-years. Time from presentation was defined as the time of first reported symptoms until time of actual diagnosis. The median age was 65. 22 patients had limited disease while 47 had extensive disease (Table 1). The median time from diagnosis to starting chemotherapy was 23 days (range 3 to 63 days). The types of chemotherapy used (first line chemotherapy options) included carboplatin, cisplatin, etoposide, topotecan, and paclitaxel. Documented Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were used to evaluate a patient’s performance status depending on the physical and their preference. The ECOG scores were converted to a KPS score based off of a scale for efficient statistical evaluation. Comorbidities (coronary artery disease, history of MI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, peripheral artery disease, CHF, diabetes, hepatitis, COPD, history of PE, history of malignancy, tuberculosis) were assessed and patients were stratified into groups with less than or greater than 3 total comorbidities. Only the first round of chemotherapy was analyzed in this study (chemotherapy timing with second line chemotherapy after progression was not examined).","PeriodicalId":13873,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of Time to Chemotherapy Initiation in Small Cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"J KubicekGregory, K. Rachel, J RossiMatthew, S. Christian, H. Alexander, P. Melvin, A. Stephen, Khrizman Polina\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-3419/1410111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a short median survival time. Because of the rapid growth rate there may be an advantage to emergently beginning chemotherapy as soon as SCLC diagnosis is made. Methods: All SCLC patients evaluated at Cooper University Hospital from January 2011 to September 2014 were reviewed. Multiple clinical factors were analyzed including timing between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy. Results: A total of 75 patients were analyzed. On univariate analysis there was a survival detriment to early initiation of chemotherapy. With multivariate analysis the difference in survival disappeared. With logistic regression, the only variable that was related to overall survival was stage (extensive versus limited). We did not find any subset that benefited from early initiation of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Mortality and cumulative survival time were not improved by early initiation of chemotherapy for any patient subset. Only stage at diagnosis was predictive for mortality and cumulative survival. Our data appears to show that urgency in starting chemotherapy has little bearing on survival in patients diagnosed with SCLC. The data suggest that there is no detriment to a non-urgent start time for chemotherapy. time, symptomatic disease, and early development of metastatic disease [1,2]. The cellular proliferation rate is much higher in comparison to other types of lung cancer, which has contributed tothe view of newly diagnosed SCLC as an “oncologic emergency”. Some oncologists will urge the start of chemotherapy as soon as possible (sometimes within 24 hours of diagnosis) given the potential for aggressive growth and metastasis. Similarly, some institutions will keep a patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer admitted to the hospital until final pathology is available so that in the event that the final diagnosis is SCLC chemotherapy can be initiated immediately as an in-patient. The theoretical rationale for emergent start of chemotherapy is based on the perceived rapid growth rate for SCLC. Since the tumor has such rapid growth potential, earlier chemotherapy start time may allow for an increase in cure rate for limited stage patients and provide improved disease control in extensive stage patients. While there may be a theoretical benefit to early initiation of chemotherapy, there is also a downside. Emergent initiation of therapy may overwhelm patients who haven’t had time to properly process their disease status (including potentially compromising the integrity of informed consent), strain hospital systems with the costs of inpatient chemotherapy and delayed discharge, and interfere with proper disease staging. Introduction Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is aparticularly aggressive lung malignancy characterized by a rapid doubling ISSN: 2378-3419 DOI: 10.23937/2378-3419/1410111 Kubicek et al. Int J Cancer Clin Res 2019, 6:111 • Page 2 of 5 • number of pack-years. Time from presentation was defined as the time of first reported symptoms until time of actual diagnosis. The median age was 65. 22 patients had limited disease while 47 had extensive disease (Table 1). The median time from diagnosis to starting chemotherapy was 23 days (range 3 to 63 days). The types of chemotherapy used (first line chemotherapy options) included carboplatin, cisplatin, etoposide, topotecan, and paclitaxel. Documented Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were used to evaluate a patient’s performance status depending on the physical and their preference. The ECOG scores were converted to a KPS score based off of a scale for efficient statistical evaluation. Comorbidities (coronary artery disease, history of MI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, peripheral artery disease, CHF, diabetes, hepatitis, COPD, history of PE, history of malignancy, tuberculosis) were assessed and patients were stratified into groups with less than or greater than 3 total comorbidities. Only the first round of chemotherapy was analyzed in this study (chemotherapy timing with second line chemotherapy after progression was not examined).\",\"PeriodicalId\":13873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,中位生存时间短。由于生长速度快,一旦诊断为SCLC,紧急开始化疗可能有优势。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年9月在库珀大学医院接受评估的所有SCLC患者。分析了多种临床因素,包括诊断和化疗开始的时间。结果:共分析75例患者。单因素分析显示,早期开始化疗对生存率有不利影响。通过多变量分析,生存率的差异消失。通过逻辑回归,与总生存率相关的唯一变量是分期(广泛vs有限)。我们没有发现任何亚组从早期化疗中获益。结论:对于任何患者亚组,早期开始化疗均未改善死亡率和累积生存时间。只有诊断时的分期可预测死亡率和累积生存率。我们的数据似乎表明,紧急开始化疗对SCLC患者的生存几乎没有影响。数据表明,不紧急开始化疗没有损害。时间、症状性疾病和转移性疾病的早期发展[1,2]。与其他类型的肺癌相比,SCLC的细胞增殖率要高得多,这使得新诊断的SCLC被认为是一种“肿瘤急症”。一些肿瘤学家会敦促尽早开始化疗(有时在诊断后24小时内),因为有可能出现侵袭性生长和转移。同样,一些机构会让新诊断的肺癌患者住院,直到最终病理结果出来,以便在最终诊断为SCLC的情况下,可以作为住院患者立即开始化疗。紧急开始化疗的理论依据是基于SCLC的快速增长速度。由于肿瘤具有如此快速的生长潜力,较早的化疗开始时间可能会提高有限期患者的治愈率,并改善广泛期患者的疾病控制。虽然从理论上讲,早期开始化疗可能有好处,但也有缺点。紧急开始治疗可能会使没有时间正确处理其疾病状态的患者不堪重负(包括可能损害知情同意的完整性),使住院化疗和延迟出院的费用使医院系统紧张,并干扰适当的疾病分期。小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种特别具有侵袭性的肺部恶性肿瘤,其特征是快速翻倍ISSN: 2378-3419 DOI: 10.23937/2378-3419/1410111 Kubicek等。国际癌症临床杂志,2019,6:111•第2页5•包年数。从出现到实际诊断的时间定义为首次报告症状的时间。平均年龄为65岁。22例患者病情有限,47例患者病情广泛(表1)。从诊断到开始化疗的中位时间为23天(范围3至63天)。使用的化疗类型(一线化疗方案)包括卡铂、顺铂、依托泊苷、拓扑替康和紫杉醇。文献Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)和Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)评分用于根据患者的身体状况和偏好来评估患者的表现状态。ECOG评分根据有效的统计评估量表转换为KPS评分。评估合并症(冠状动脉疾病、心肌梗死史、高血压、高脂血症、外周动脉疾病、慢性心力衰竭、糖尿病、肝炎、慢性阻塞性肺病、PE史、恶性肿瘤史、结核病史),并将患者分为合并症小于或大于3的组。本研究仅分析了第一轮化疗(未检查进展后的化疗时间和二线化疗时间)。
Importance of Time to Chemotherapy Initiation in Small Cell Lung Cancer
Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a short median survival time. Because of the rapid growth rate there may be an advantage to emergently beginning chemotherapy as soon as SCLC diagnosis is made. Methods: All SCLC patients evaluated at Cooper University Hospital from January 2011 to September 2014 were reviewed. Multiple clinical factors were analyzed including timing between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy. Results: A total of 75 patients were analyzed. On univariate analysis there was a survival detriment to early initiation of chemotherapy. With multivariate analysis the difference in survival disappeared. With logistic regression, the only variable that was related to overall survival was stage (extensive versus limited). We did not find any subset that benefited from early initiation of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Mortality and cumulative survival time were not improved by early initiation of chemotherapy for any patient subset. Only stage at diagnosis was predictive for mortality and cumulative survival. Our data appears to show that urgency in starting chemotherapy has little bearing on survival in patients diagnosed with SCLC. The data suggest that there is no detriment to a non-urgent start time for chemotherapy. time, symptomatic disease, and early development of metastatic disease [1,2]. The cellular proliferation rate is much higher in comparison to other types of lung cancer, which has contributed tothe view of newly diagnosed SCLC as an “oncologic emergency”. Some oncologists will urge the start of chemotherapy as soon as possible (sometimes within 24 hours of diagnosis) given the potential for aggressive growth and metastasis. Similarly, some institutions will keep a patient with newly diagnosed lung cancer admitted to the hospital until final pathology is available so that in the event that the final diagnosis is SCLC chemotherapy can be initiated immediately as an in-patient. The theoretical rationale for emergent start of chemotherapy is based on the perceived rapid growth rate for SCLC. Since the tumor has such rapid growth potential, earlier chemotherapy start time may allow for an increase in cure rate for limited stage patients and provide improved disease control in extensive stage patients. While there may be a theoretical benefit to early initiation of chemotherapy, there is also a downside. Emergent initiation of therapy may overwhelm patients who haven’t had time to properly process their disease status (including potentially compromising the integrity of informed consent), strain hospital systems with the costs of inpatient chemotherapy and delayed discharge, and interfere with proper disease staging. Introduction Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is aparticularly aggressive lung malignancy characterized by a rapid doubling ISSN: 2378-3419 DOI: 10.23937/2378-3419/1410111 Kubicek et al. Int J Cancer Clin Res 2019, 6:111 • Page 2 of 5 • number of pack-years. Time from presentation was defined as the time of first reported symptoms until time of actual diagnosis. The median age was 65. 22 patients had limited disease while 47 had extensive disease (Table 1). The median time from diagnosis to starting chemotherapy was 23 days (range 3 to 63 days). The types of chemotherapy used (first line chemotherapy options) included carboplatin, cisplatin, etoposide, topotecan, and paclitaxel. Documented Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were used to evaluate a patient’s performance status depending on the physical and their preference. The ECOG scores were converted to a KPS score based off of a scale for efficient statistical evaluation. Comorbidities (coronary artery disease, history of MI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, peripheral artery disease, CHF, diabetes, hepatitis, COPD, history of PE, history of malignancy, tuberculosis) were assessed and patients were stratified into groups with less than or greater than 3 total comorbidities. Only the first round of chemotherapy was analyzed in this study (chemotherapy timing with second line chemotherapy after progression was not examined).