将“非形式化”置于国际法院:理解制度化的非正式性

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1163/15718034-bja10102

Rahul Mohanty

{"title":"将“非形式化”置于国际法院:理解制度化的非正式性","authors":"Rahul Mohanty","doi":"10.1163/15718034-bja10102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article approaches the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and its decisions from the lens of “deformalization”. It conceptualises “deformalization” not in a de-institutionalised sense, but as implying informality within the functioning of formal institutions. It posits that it may be useful to adopt this perspective to examine some of the actions of the ICJ, which may not be adequately explained from a purely formal standpoint. It examines various areas of deformalization within the ICJ, such as its approach towards evidence or provisional measures. It attempts to understand why and when deformalization is needed by the ICJ and concludes that the ICJ walks a tightrope between formal rules and informal application, in order to improve its effectiveness and legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":42613,"journal":{"name":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situating “Deformalization” within the International Court of Justice: Understanding Institutionalised Informality\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Mohanty\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718034-bja10102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article approaches the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and its decisions from the lens of “deformalization”. It conceptualises “deformalization” not in a de-institutionalised sense, but as implying informality within the functioning of formal institutions. It posits that it may be useful to adopt this perspective to examine some of the actions of the ICJ, which may not be adequately explained from a purely formal standpoint. It examines various areas of deformalization within the ICJ, such as its approach towards evidence or provisional measures. It attempts to understand why and when deformalization is needed by the ICJ and concludes that the ICJ walks a tightrope between formal rules and informal application, in order to improve its effectiveness and legitimacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-bja10102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-bja10102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从“非形式化”的角度来探讨国际法院及其判决。它将“非形式化”概念化，不是在去制度化的意义上，而是在正式机构的功能中暗示着非正式性。它认为，采用这一观点来审查国际法院的一些行动可能是有益的，这些行动可能无法从纯粹的形式观点得到充分解释。它审查了国际法院内部各种不规范的领域，例如其对证据或临时措施的态度。它试图理解国际法院为什么以及何时需要非形式化，并得出结论，国际法院在正式规则和非正式适用之间走钢丝，以提高其有效性和合法性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Situating “Deformalization” within the International Court of Justice: Understanding Institutionalised Informality

This article approaches the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and its decisions from the lens of “deformalization”. It conceptualises “deformalization” not in a de-institutionalised sense, but as implying informality within the functioning of formal institutions. It posits that it may be useful to adopt this perspective to examine some of the actions of the ICJ, which may not be adequately explained from a purely formal standpoint. It examines various areas of deformalization within the ICJ, such as its approach towards evidence or provisional measures. It attempts to understand why and when deformalization is needed by the ICJ and concludes that the ICJ walks a tightrope between formal rules and informal application, in order to improve its effectiveness and legitimacy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals LAW-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

40.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals is firmly established as the leading journal in its field. Each issue will give you the latest developments with respect to the preparation, adoption, suspension, amendment and revision of Rules of Procedure as well as statutory and internal rules and other related matters. The Journal will also provide you with the latest practice with respect to the interpretation and application of rules of procedure and constitutional documents, which can be found in judgments, advisory opinions, written and oral pleadings as well as legal literature.