颗粒土中开挖周围的地面运动:关于本构假设对有限元预测影响的几点评论

G. Viggiani, C. Tamagnini
{"title":"颗粒土中开挖周围的地面运动:关于本构假设对有限元预测影响的几点评论","authors":"G. Viggiani, C. Tamagnini","doi":"10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two different approaches for modelling soil non-linearity (hardening plasticity and hypoplasticity) are compared with reference to the analysis of soil–structure interaction in an excavation in dense dry sand, supported by a propped diaphragm wall. The analysis focuses on the prediction of wall and soil movements. A commercial FE code has been used for the elastoplastic analyses, in order to assess the performance of a readily available design tool in current geotechnical engineering practice as compared to the predictions of a more advanced research tool. Although obtained for an idealized scheme, the results allow a number of more general conclusions to be drawn on the influence of the constitutive assumptions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":100899,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ground movements around excavations in granular soils: a few remarks on the influence of the constitutive assumptions on FE predictions\",\"authors\":\"G. Viggiani, C. Tamagnini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two different approaches for modelling soil non-linearity (hardening plasticity and hypoplasticity) are compared with reference to the analysis of soil–structure interaction in an excavation in dense dry sand, supported by a propped diaphragm wall. The analysis focuses on the prediction of wall and soil movements. A commercial FE code has been used for the elastoplastic analyses, in order to assess the performance of a readily available design tool in current geotechnical engineering practice as compared to the predictions of a more advanced research tool. Although obtained for an idealized scheme, the results allow a number of more general conclusions to be drawn on the influence of the constitutive assumptions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1484(200007)5:5<399::AID-CFM101>3.0.CO;2-R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

对比了两种不同的土体非线性建模方法(硬化塑性和亚塑性),并结合地下连续墙支撑下密集干砂土开挖中土-结构相互作用的分析。分析的重点是墙和土的运动预测。弹塑性分析使用了商业有限元代码,以便与更先进的研究工具的预测结果相比,评估当前岩土工程实践中现成的设计工具的性能。虽然得到了一个理想化的方案,但结果允许对本构假设的影响得出一些更一般的结论。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ground movements around excavations in granular soils: a few remarks on the influence of the constitutive assumptions on FE predictions
Two different approaches for modelling soil non-linearity (hardening plasticity and hypoplasticity) are compared with reference to the analysis of soil–structure interaction in an excavation in dense dry sand, supported by a propped diaphragm wall. The analysis focuses on the prediction of wall and soil movements. A commercial FE code has been used for the elastoplastic analyses, in order to assess the performance of a readily available design tool in current geotechnical engineering practice as compared to the predictions of a more advanced research tool. Although obtained for an idealized scheme, the results allow a number of more general conclusions to be drawn on the influence of the constitutive assumptions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instabilities in granular materials and application to landslides Computational Geomechanics with Special Reference to Earthquake Engineering, by O. C. Zienkiewicz, A. H. C. Chan, M. Pastor, B. A. Schrefler, T. Shiomi, by John Wiley, New York, 1999. ISBN 0-471-98285-7. GBP £100.00. Damage model for concrete-like materials coupling cracking and friction, contribution towards structural damping: first uniaxial applications Modelling of solid-phase sintering of hardmetal using a mesomechanics approach Modelling of solid‐phase sintering of hardmetal using a mesomechanics approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1