论专利权的结构

N. Spiridonova
{"title":"论专利权的结构","authors":"N. Spiridonova","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-108-135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both foreign and domestic doctrine have traditionally considered right to exclude others from use of the invention as a key or even the only component of exclusive patent rights. Economic relations regulated by patent law are currently rapidly developing though, and today we should acknowledge the economic shift that requires reconceptualization of the dominant postulates of patent law theory. In particular, the prevalent economic functions of contemporary patent law are, firstly, technology transfer aimed at disseminating and practical implementation of innovations, and secondly, ensuring optimal allocation of information about innovations for their proper commercialization and commodification, as well as for their further development. In turn, the above functions in terms of patent rights correlate to right to use the invention and to delegate such use to third parties. Those rights are the rights to the authorized person’s own de facto and de jure actions, in other words, privileges (use rights) and powers (disposal rights).","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ON STRUCTURE OF PATENT RIGHTS\",\"authors\":\"N. Spiridonova\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-108-135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Both foreign and domestic doctrine have traditionally considered right to exclude others from use of the invention as a key or even the only component of exclusive patent rights. Economic relations regulated by patent law are currently rapidly developing though, and today we should acknowledge the economic shift that requires reconceptualization of the dominant postulates of patent law theory. In particular, the prevalent economic functions of contemporary patent law are, firstly, technology transfer aimed at disseminating and practical implementation of innovations, and secondly, ensuring optimal allocation of information about innovations for their proper commercialization and commodification, as well as for their further development. In turn, the above functions in terms of patent rights correlate to right to use the invention and to delegate such use to third parties. Those rights are the rights to the authorized person’s own de facto and de jure actions, in other words, privileges (use rights) and powers (disposal rights).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-108-135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-108-135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国外和国内的理论传统上都认为排除他人使用发明的权利是排他性专利权的关键甚至是唯一组成部分。虽然专利法所规范的经济关系目前正在迅速发展,但今天我们应该承认经济的转变需要对专利法理论的主导假设进行重新概念化。特别是,当代专利法的主要经济功能是,首先,旨在传播和实际实施创新的技术转让,其次,确保创新信息的最佳配置,以实现其适当的商业化和商品化,以及进一步发展。反过来,就专利权而言,上述功能与使用发明和将这种使用委托给第三方的权利相关。这些权利是被授权人对自己的事实和法律行为的权利,换句话说,是特权(使用权)和权力(处置权)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ON STRUCTURE OF PATENT RIGHTS
Both foreign and domestic doctrine have traditionally considered right to exclude others from use of the invention as a key or even the only component of exclusive patent rights. Economic relations regulated by patent law are currently rapidly developing though, and today we should acknowledge the economic shift that requires reconceptualization of the dominant postulates of patent law theory. In particular, the prevalent economic functions of contemporary patent law are, firstly, technology transfer aimed at disseminating and practical implementation of innovations, and secondly, ensuring optimal allocation of information about innovations for their proper commercialization and commodification, as well as for their further development. In turn, the above functions in terms of patent rights correlate to right to use the invention and to delegate such use to third parties. Those rights are the rights to the authorized person’s own de facto and de jure actions, in other words, privileges (use rights) and powers (disposal rights).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.
期刊最新文献
ON THE IMPACT OF THE REGISTRATION SYSTEM OF THE REAL ESTATE TURNOVER THE PRICIPLES OF CIVIL LIABILITY (finale) ON THE DEFECTS OF THE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT “LAND PLOT” IN THE FEDERAL LAW NO. 430-FZ INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “RECENT HISTORY OF PRIVATE LAW: TO THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE RESEARCH CENTRE” THE IMPUTATION OF HARM TO A PERSON WHO IS ECONOMICALLY EASIER TO BEAR ITS CONSEQUENCES AS AN ARGUMENT FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION IN TORT LAW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1