底灰石膏应急修复控制低强度材料

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.2.019
So-Yeon Lee, H. Yoon, Min Son, J. Kong, Hyuk-sang Jung
{"title":"底灰石膏应急修复控制低强度材料","authors":"So-Yeon Lee, H. Yoon, Min Son, J. Kong, Hyuk-sang Jung","doi":"10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.2.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently the ground subsidence which seriously weakens the safety of cities tends to increase. The purpose of this paper is to develop the materials by using industrial by-products for the application to emergency restoration process in case of ground subsidence. In this paper the laboratory tests including pH test, initial setting test, unconfined compressive strength test, and flow test were performed in order to evaluate the design properties of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM). The field test was carried out for evaluating the performance for the early strength of CLSM and the workability for emergency restoration. Test results showed that the strength will be too high to re-excavate the ground when the cement ratio is more than 4%. The optimum mixing ratio appears to be most effective when the mixing ratio of the bottom ash and the gypsum is approximately 50:50 and the cement content is 2%.","PeriodicalId":42164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","volume":"11 1","pages":"19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlled Low Strength Material for Emergency Restoration Using Bottom Ash and Gypsum\",\"authors\":\"So-Yeon Lee, H. Yoon, Min Son, J. Kong, Hyuk-sang Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.2.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently the ground subsidence which seriously weakens the safety of cities tends to increase. The purpose of this paper is to develop the materials by using industrial by-products for the application to emergency restoration process in case of ground subsidence. In this paper the laboratory tests including pH test, initial setting test, unconfined compressive strength test, and flow test were performed in order to evaluate the design properties of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM). The field test was carried out for evaluating the performance for the early strength of CLSM and the workability for emergency restoration. Test results showed that the strength will be too high to re-excavate the ground when the cement ratio is more than 4%. The optimum mixing ratio appears to be most effective when the mixing ratio of the bottom ash and the gypsum is approximately 50:50 and the cement content is 2%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"19-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.2.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12814/JKGSS.2018.17.2.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,严重削弱城市安全的地面沉降有加剧的趋势。本文的目的是利用工业副产物开发用于地面沉降应急恢复过程的材料。通过pH试验、初凝试验、无侧限抗压强度试验、流动试验等室内试验,对可控低强度材料(CLSM)的设计性能进行了评价。为评价CLSM的早期强度性能和应急修复的可操作性,进行了现场试验。试验结果表明,当水泥比大于4%时,地基强度过高,无法再开挖。当底灰与石膏的掺量约为50:50,水泥掺量为2%时,最佳掺量最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Controlled Low Strength Material for Emergency Restoration Using Bottom Ash and Gypsum
Recently the ground subsidence which seriously weakens the safety of cities tends to increase. The purpose of this paper is to develop the materials by using industrial by-products for the application to emergency restoration process in case of ground subsidence. In this paper the laboratory tests including pH test, initial setting test, unconfined compressive strength test, and flow test were performed in order to evaluate the design properties of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM). The field test was carried out for evaluating the performance for the early strength of CLSM and the workability for emergency restoration. Test results showed that the strength will be too high to re-excavate the ground when the cement ratio is more than 4%. The optimum mixing ratio appears to be most effective when the mixing ratio of the bottom ash and the gypsum is approximately 50:50 and the cement content is 2%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Field Applicability of Slope of Improved Soil for Ground Stabilizer Analysis of the Correlation between the velocity speed of High-Speed Railways and the Suppressing Effect of lateral Displacement of retaining wall according to the Arrangement of Stabilizing Piles Behavioral Characteristics and Safety Management Plan for Fill Dam During Water Level Fluctuation Using Numerical Analysis Application of Laboratory Pressurized Vane Shear Test and Discrete Element Method for Determination of Foam-conditioned Soil Properties Development and Reliability Verification of Quality Control System for Compaction Grouting Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1