Quarts:实时控制系统的快速协议

W. Saab, Maaz M. Mohiuddin, S. Bliudze, J. Boudec
{"title":"Quarts:实时控制系统的快速协议","authors":"W. Saab, Maaz M. Mohiuddin, S. Bliudze, J. Boudec","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-time control systems (RTCSs) tolerate delay and crash faults by replicating the controller. Each replica computes and issues setpoints to actuators over a network that might drop or delay messages. Hence, the actuators might receive an inconsistent set of setpoints. Such inconsistency is avoided either by having a single primary replica compute and issue setpoints (in passive replication) or a consensus algorithm select one sending-replica (in active replication). However, due to the impossibility of a perfect failure-detector, passive-replication schemes can have multiple primaries, causing inconsistency, especially in the presence of intermittent delay faults. Furthermore, the impossibility of bounded-latency consensus causes both schemes to have poor real-time performance. We identified three properties of RTCSs that enable active-replication schemes to agree on the measurements before computing, instead of using traditional consensus. As all computing replicas compute with the same state, the resulting setpoints are guaranteed to be consistent. We present the design of Quarts, an agreement solution for active replication that guarantees consistency and bounded latency-overhead. We prove the guarantees and compare the performance of Quarts with existing solutions through simulation. We show that Quarts provides an availability higher than existing solutions, and that the availability improvement is up to 10x with two replicas.","PeriodicalId":6522,"journal":{"name":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quarts: Quick agreement for real-time control systems\",\"authors\":\"W. Saab, Maaz M. Mohiuddin, S. Bliudze, J. Boudec\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real-time control systems (RTCSs) tolerate delay and crash faults by replicating the controller. Each replica computes and issues setpoints to actuators over a network that might drop or delay messages. Hence, the actuators might receive an inconsistent set of setpoints. Such inconsistency is avoided either by having a single primary replica compute and issue setpoints (in passive replication) or a consensus algorithm select one sending-replica (in active replication). However, due to the impossibility of a perfect failure-detector, passive-replication schemes can have multiple primaries, causing inconsistency, especially in the presence of intermittent delay faults. Furthermore, the impossibility of bounded-latency consensus causes both schemes to have poor real-time performance. We identified three properties of RTCSs that enable active-replication schemes to agree on the measurements before computing, instead of using traditional consensus. As all computing replicas compute with the same state, the resulting setpoints are guaranteed to be consistent. We present the design of Quarts, an agreement solution for active replication that guarantees consistency and bounded latency-overhead. We prove the guarantees and compare the performance of Quarts with existing solutions through simulation. We show that Quarts provides an availability higher than existing solutions, and that the availability improvement is up to 10x with two replicas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

实时控制系统(RTCSs)通过复制控制器来容忍延迟和崩溃故障。每个副本通过网络计算并向执行器发送设定值,这可能会丢失或延迟消息。因此,执行器可能接收到一组不一致的设定值。这种不一致可以通过使用单个主副本计算和发出设置点(在被动复制中)或一致性算法选择一个发送副本(在主动复制中)来避免。然而,由于不可能有完美的故障检测器,被动复制方案可能有多个主节点,导致不一致,特别是在存在间歇性延迟故障的情况下。此外,由于无法实现有界延迟一致性,这两种方案的实时性都很差。我们确定了RTCSs的三个属性,使活动复制方案能够在计算之前就测量结果达成一致,而不是使用传统的共识。由于所有的计算副本都以相同的状态进行计算,因此结果设定值保证是一致的。我们提出了Quarts的设计,这是一种用于主动复制的协议解决方案,它保证了一致性和有限的延迟开销。我们通过仿真验证了这些保证,并将Quarts与现有解决方案的性能进行了比较。我们展示了Quarts提供了比现有解决方案更高的可用性,并且两个副本的可用性改进高达10倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quarts: Quick agreement for real-time control systems
Real-time control systems (RTCSs) tolerate delay and crash faults by replicating the controller. Each replica computes and issues setpoints to actuators over a network that might drop or delay messages. Hence, the actuators might receive an inconsistent set of setpoints. Such inconsistency is avoided either by having a single primary replica compute and issue setpoints (in passive replication) or a consensus algorithm select one sending-replica (in active replication). However, due to the impossibility of a perfect failure-detector, passive-replication schemes can have multiple primaries, causing inconsistency, especially in the presence of intermittent delay faults. Furthermore, the impossibility of bounded-latency consensus causes both schemes to have poor real-time performance. We identified three properties of RTCSs that enable active-replication schemes to agree on the measurements before computing, instead of using traditional consensus. As all computing replicas compute with the same state, the resulting setpoints are guaranteed to be consistent. We present the design of Quarts, an agreement solution for active replication that guarantees consistency and bounded latency-overhead. We prove the guarantees and compare the performance of Quarts with existing solutions through simulation. We show that Quarts provides an availability higher than existing solutions, and that the availability improvement is up to 10x with two replicas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Practical and Formal Security Risk Analysis of IoT (Internet of Things) Applications Modeling Misbehavior Detection Timeliness in VANETs Embedding Anomaly Detection Autoencoders for Wind Turbines The Beremiz PLC: Adding Support for Industrial Communication Protocols Using code generated by MATLAB for the Mold Level Control System of a Continuous Slab Caster in ArcelorMittal Gent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1