西班牙国有企业可持续发展报告中重要性流程的披露

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-20 DOI:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3629
Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano, Marta de Vicente-Lama, Pilar Tirado-Valencia, Magdalena Cordobés-Madueño
{"title":"西班牙国有企业可持续发展报告中重要性流程的披露","authors":"Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano, Marta de Vicente-Lama, Pilar Tirado-Valencia, Magdalena Cordobés-Madueño","doi":"10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to assess the disclosure of the materiality process in the preparation of sustainability reports of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). This paper also explores the effects of regulation mandating that SOEs prepare sustainability reports. In the specific case of port authorities, the study analyses the influence of a sector guideline that determines what should be included and the structure of the report. Another aim of this paper is to delve into SOE's motivations for disclosing information on materiality assessments, using the assumptions of the different theories to explain their reporting practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of SOEs sustainability reports, a content analysis is undertaken. The methodology involves the analysis of the information disclosed by SOEs in Spain and the development of a materiality disclosure index. This index enables sampled entities to be classified on a scale of 0–5, based on the extent of their disclosures of the materiality determination process. This study also identifies several variables that explain differences in these disclosures.FindingsA low rate of information disclosed about the materiality process can be attributed to the desire of SOEs to create symbolic legitimacy. In a context where the disclosure of sustainability information is mandatory, only few organisations apply the principle of materiality to define the content of their sustainability reports. These results highlight that institutional isomorphism has only had a limited effect on the materiality process.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations associated with the sample size and composition of the sample by sector apply.Practical implicationsThis research shows that generally accepted reporting guidelines constitute a reference framework for sustainability reporting but that the principles underpinning these frameworks are not always implemented.Originality/valueThis study extends the literature on the implementation of the principle of materiality and uses disclosure theories to explain the actual reporting by SOEs of their materiality process.","PeriodicalId":48311,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The disclosure of the materiality process in sustainability reporting by Spanish state-owned enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano, Marta de Vicente-Lama, Pilar Tirado-Valencia, Magdalena Cordobés-Madueño\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper aims to assess the disclosure of the materiality process in the preparation of sustainability reports of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). This paper also explores the effects of regulation mandating that SOEs prepare sustainability reports. In the specific case of port authorities, the study analyses the influence of a sector guideline that determines what should be included and the structure of the report. Another aim of this paper is to delve into SOE's motivations for disclosing information on materiality assessments, using the assumptions of the different theories to explain their reporting practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of SOEs sustainability reports, a content analysis is undertaken. The methodology involves the analysis of the information disclosed by SOEs in Spain and the development of a materiality disclosure index. This index enables sampled entities to be classified on a scale of 0–5, based on the extent of their disclosures of the materiality determination process. This study also identifies several variables that explain differences in these disclosures.FindingsA low rate of information disclosed about the materiality process can be attributed to the desire of SOEs to create symbolic legitimacy. In a context where the disclosure of sustainability information is mandatory, only few organisations apply the principle of materiality to define the content of their sustainability reports. These results highlight that institutional isomorphism has only had a limited effect on the materiality process.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations associated with the sample size and composition of the sample by sector apply.Practical implicationsThis research shows that generally accepted reporting guidelines constitute a reference framework for sustainability reporting but that the principles underpinning these frameworks are not always implemented.Originality/valueThis study extends the literature on the implementation of the principle of materiality and uses disclosure theories to explain the actual reporting by SOEs of their materiality process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文旨在评估国有企业在编制可持续发展报告过程中的重要性披露情况。本文还探讨了规定国有企业编制可持续发展报告的影响。在港口当局的具体情况下,该研究分析了部门准则的影响,该准则决定了报告应包括的内容和结构。本文的另一个目的是深入探讨国有企业在重要性评估中披露信息的动机,使用不同理论的假设来解释它们的报告实践。设计/方法/方法使用国有企业可持续发展报告样本,进行内容分析。该方法包括对西班牙国有企业披露的信息进行分析,并制定重要性披露指数。该指数使抽样实体能够根据其对重要性确定过程的披露程度,按0-5的等级进行分类。这项研究还确定了几个变量来解释这些信息披露的差异。关于物质性过程的信息披露率低可归因于国有企业希望创造象征性的合法性。在强制性披露可持续发展信息的背景下,只有少数组织应用重要性原则来定义其可持续发展报告的内容。这些结果突出表明,制度同构对物质性过程的影响有限。研究的限制/影响与样本大小和按部门组成的样本有关的限制适用。实际意义本研究表明,普遍接受的报告准则构成了可持续发展报告的参考框架,但支撑这些框架的原则并不总是得到实施。原创性/价值本研究扩展了关于重要性原则实施的文献,并运用披露理论解释国有企业对其重要性过程的实际报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The disclosure of the materiality process in sustainability reporting by Spanish state-owned enterprises
PurposeThis paper aims to assess the disclosure of the materiality process in the preparation of sustainability reports of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). This paper also explores the effects of regulation mandating that SOEs prepare sustainability reports. In the specific case of port authorities, the study analyses the influence of a sector guideline that determines what should be included and the structure of the report. Another aim of this paper is to delve into SOE's motivations for disclosing information on materiality assessments, using the assumptions of the different theories to explain their reporting practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of SOEs sustainability reports, a content analysis is undertaken. The methodology involves the analysis of the information disclosed by SOEs in Spain and the development of a materiality disclosure index. This index enables sampled entities to be classified on a scale of 0–5, based on the extent of their disclosures of the materiality determination process. This study also identifies several variables that explain differences in these disclosures.FindingsA low rate of information disclosed about the materiality process can be attributed to the desire of SOEs to create symbolic legitimacy. In a context where the disclosure of sustainability information is mandatory, only few organisations apply the principle of materiality to define the content of their sustainability reports. These results highlight that institutional isomorphism has only had a limited effect on the materiality process.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations associated with the sample size and composition of the sample by sector apply.Practical implicationsThis research shows that generally accepted reporting guidelines constitute a reference framework for sustainability reporting but that the principles underpinning these frameworks are not always implemented.Originality/valueThis study extends the literature on the implementation of the principle of materiality and uses disclosure theories to explain the actual reporting by SOEs of their materiality process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Dedicated to the advancement of accounting knowledge, the Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal publishes high quality manuscripts concerning the interaction between accounting/auditing and their socio-economic and political environments, encouraging critical analysis of policy and practice in these areas. The journal also seeks to encourage debate about the philosophies and traditions which underpin the accounting profession, the implications of new policy alternatives and the impact of accountancy on the socio-economic and political environment.
期刊最新文献
Exploring a Soccer Society: dreams, themes and the beautiful game Reporting controversial issues in controversial industries AAAJ Literature and Insights 36.7/8 Editorial The accounting profession is undergoing a change An autistic in postgraduate accounting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1