人机交互发展中的伦理、法律和参与问题

Q1 Social Sciences i-com Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1515/icom-2022-0025
Felix Carros, Tobias Störzinger, Anne Wierling, Adrian Preussner, P. Tolmie
{"title":"人机交互发展中的伦理、法律和参与问题","authors":"Felix Carros, Tobias Störzinger, Anne Wierling, Adrian Preussner, P. Tolmie","doi":"10.1515/icom-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on Human-Robot Interaction is increasing as system become widely available and reached a level that enables smooth interactions. Yet, many research projects act in a silo mentality, in regard of participatory, ethical, or legal matters of social robotics. Knowledge about specific challenges is not universal and has often to be transferred from non-robotic contexts. We present findings in the three dimensions: participatory design, ethics for social robots and legal aspects. We accompanied eight research projects on social robots in real-world scenarios for three years. During that time, we spoke, observed, and helped (where possible) the research projects. This gave us specific insights into their work. Our findings work in three dimensions. In participatory design we observed that the trust relationship to users is essential to gain truthful insights and that a mixed method approach is promising. Regarding ethical aspects, we could see that ethical matters should be answered early on. And in the legal dimensions we noticed that the GDPR regulations are a challenge that often requires the help of experts. This work is reflecting on the observation of eight projects and is collecting lessons learned to help future projects and to learn from previous work.","PeriodicalId":37105,"journal":{"name":"i-com","volume":"23 1","pages":"299 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical, Legal & Participatory Concerns in the Development of Human-Robot Interaction\",\"authors\":\"Felix Carros, Tobias Störzinger, Anne Wierling, Adrian Preussner, P. Tolmie\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/icom-2022-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Research on Human-Robot Interaction is increasing as system become widely available and reached a level that enables smooth interactions. Yet, many research projects act in a silo mentality, in regard of participatory, ethical, or legal matters of social robotics. Knowledge about specific challenges is not universal and has often to be transferred from non-robotic contexts. We present findings in the three dimensions: participatory design, ethics for social robots and legal aspects. We accompanied eight research projects on social robots in real-world scenarios for three years. During that time, we spoke, observed, and helped (where possible) the research projects. This gave us specific insights into their work. Our findings work in three dimensions. In participatory design we observed that the trust relationship to users is essential to gain truthful insights and that a mixed method approach is promising. Regarding ethical aspects, we could see that ethical matters should be answered early on. And in the legal dimensions we noticed that the GDPR regulations are a challenge that often requires the help of experts. This work is reflecting on the observation of eight projects and is collecting lessons learned to help future projects and to learn from previous work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"i-com\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"299 - 309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"i-com\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2022-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-com","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要随着系统的广泛应用,人机交互的研究越来越多,并且已经达到了可以实现平滑交互的水平。然而,在社交机器人的参与性、伦理或法律问题上,许多研究项目都处于竖井心态。关于特定挑战的知识并不普遍,而且往往是从非机器人环境中转移过来的。我们提出了三个方面的研究结果:参与式设计,社会机器人伦理和法律方面。在过去的三年里,我们参与了八个关于现实世界中社交机器人的研究项目。在那段时间里,我们发言、观察,并(在可能的情况下)帮助研究项目。这让我们对他们的工作有了具体的了解。我们的研究结果在三个维度上起作用。在参与式设计中,我们观察到与用户的信任关系对于获得真实的见解至关重要,并且混合方法方法很有希望。关于伦理方面,我们可以看到伦理问题应该尽早得到回答。在法律层面,我们注意到GDPR法规是一个挑战,通常需要专家的帮助。这项工作反映了对八个项目的观察,并正在收集经验教训,以帮助未来的项目,并从以前的工作中学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical, Legal & Participatory Concerns in the Development of Human-Robot Interaction
Abstract Research on Human-Robot Interaction is increasing as system become widely available and reached a level that enables smooth interactions. Yet, many research projects act in a silo mentality, in regard of participatory, ethical, or legal matters of social robotics. Knowledge about specific challenges is not universal and has often to be transferred from non-robotic contexts. We present findings in the three dimensions: participatory design, ethics for social robots and legal aspects. We accompanied eight research projects on social robots in real-world scenarios for three years. During that time, we spoke, observed, and helped (where possible) the research projects. This gave us specific insights into their work. Our findings work in three dimensions. In participatory design we observed that the trust relationship to users is essential to gain truthful insights and that a mixed method approach is promising. Regarding ethical aspects, we could see that ethical matters should be answered early on. And in the legal dimensions we noticed that the GDPR regulations are a challenge that often requires the help of experts. This work is reflecting on the observation of eight projects and is collecting lessons learned to help future projects and to learn from previous work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
i-com
i-com Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Social anthropology 4.0 The future of interactive information radiators for knowledge workers The future of HCI – editorial Towards new realities: implications of personalized online layers in our daily lives Broadening the mind: how emerging neurotechnology is reshaping HCI and interactive system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1