论疯子、恋人与诗人:莎士比亚《仲夏夜之梦》中关于诗歌的对话

IF 0.1 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES Ben Jonson Journal Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.3366/BJJ.2018.0224
Donald Carlson
{"title":"论疯子、恋人与诗人:莎士比亚《仲夏夜之梦》中关于诗歌的对话","authors":"Donald Carlson","doi":"10.3366/BJJ.2018.0224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individual works of poetry and drama often contribute to a conversation that spans centuries, but A Midsummer Night's Dream contains a very specific dialogue in which Shakespeare takes the Jesuit priest-poet Robert Southwell for an interlocutor. Shakespeare creates this conversation by echoing Southwell's published work. By the first staging of A Midsummer Night's Dream, around 1595 or 1596, Southwell had endured a martyr's death; but that didn't stop Shakespeare from responding to the prescriptions laid down by Southwell about the proper way for Christian poets to write. His prefatory letter and introductory poem to the posthumous volume St. Peters Complaint make clear that Christian poets whose poems are not overtly devotional are squandering their talent. He remonstrates with such poets – one in particular, whom Southwell addresses as his “belov'd cousen” – to chasten themselves and to write poetry more in the vein of the reverent and improving verses included in Southwell's own volume. Through the character of Theseus, especially, and in the structure of the play, more generally, Shakespeare replies to Southwell. Shakespeare doesn't simply reject Southwell, but rather evokes an understanding of piety and poetry consistent with the pre-Reformation, late medieval Church. This understanding is one that allows room for juxtaposing the sacred and the profane as opposed to championing one at the expense of the other.","PeriodicalId":40862,"journal":{"name":"Ben Jonson Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of Lunatics, Lovers, and Poets: The Conversation about Poetry in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream\",\"authors\":\"Donald Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/BJJ.2018.0224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individual works of poetry and drama often contribute to a conversation that spans centuries, but A Midsummer Night's Dream contains a very specific dialogue in which Shakespeare takes the Jesuit priest-poet Robert Southwell for an interlocutor. Shakespeare creates this conversation by echoing Southwell's published work. By the first staging of A Midsummer Night's Dream, around 1595 or 1596, Southwell had endured a martyr's death; but that didn't stop Shakespeare from responding to the prescriptions laid down by Southwell about the proper way for Christian poets to write. His prefatory letter and introductory poem to the posthumous volume St. Peters Complaint make clear that Christian poets whose poems are not overtly devotional are squandering their talent. He remonstrates with such poets – one in particular, whom Southwell addresses as his “belov'd cousen” – to chasten themselves and to write poetry more in the vein of the reverent and improving verses included in Southwell's own volume. Through the character of Theseus, especially, and in the structure of the play, more generally, Shakespeare replies to Southwell. Shakespeare doesn't simply reject Southwell, but rather evokes an understanding of piety and poetry consistent with the pre-Reformation, late medieval Church. This understanding is one that allows room for juxtaposing the sacred and the profane as opposed to championing one at the expense of the other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ben Jonson Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ben Jonson Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/BJJ.2018.0224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ben Jonson Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/BJJ.2018.0224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个别的诗歌和戏剧作品往往有助于跨越几个世纪的对话,但《仲夏夜之梦》包含了一个非常具体的对话,莎士比亚把耶稣会牧师诗人罗伯特·索斯韦尔作为对话者。莎士比亚通过呼应索斯韦尔发表的作品创造了这段对话。到《仲夏夜之梦》第一次上演时,大约在1595年或1596年,索斯韦尔经历了殉道者的死亡;但这并没有阻止莎士比亚回应索斯韦尔关于基督教诗人正确写作方式的建议。他在遗作《圣彼得诉状》(St. Peters Complaint)中的序言和引言诗清楚地表明,基督教诗人的诗歌如果没有明显的虔诚,那就是在浪费他们的才华。他告诫这些诗人——尤其是一位被索斯韦尔称为“亲爱的堂兄”的诗人——要自我约束,在写诗时更多地遵循索斯韦尔自己的诗集中所收录的虔诚和改进的诗句。通过忒修斯这个角色,特别是在戏剧的结构中,莎士比亚对索斯韦尔的回应更为普遍。莎士比亚并不是简单地拒绝索斯韦尔,而是唤起了人们对虔诚和诗歌的理解,这与宗教改革前,中世纪晚期的教会是一致的。这种理解允许将神圣和世俗并列在一起,而不是以牺牲另一个为代价来支持一个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Of Lunatics, Lovers, and Poets: The Conversation about Poetry in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream
Individual works of poetry and drama often contribute to a conversation that spans centuries, but A Midsummer Night's Dream contains a very specific dialogue in which Shakespeare takes the Jesuit priest-poet Robert Southwell for an interlocutor. Shakespeare creates this conversation by echoing Southwell's published work. By the first staging of A Midsummer Night's Dream, around 1595 or 1596, Southwell had endured a martyr's death; but that didn't stop Shakespeare from responding to the prescriptions laid down by Southwell about the proper way for Christian poets to write. His prefatory letter and introductory poem to the posthumous volume St. Peters Complaint make clear that Christian poets whose poems are not overtly devotional are squandering their talent. He remonstrates with such poets – one in particular, whom Southwell addresses as his “belov'd cousen” – to chasten themselves and to write poetry more in the vein of the reverent and improving verses included in Southwell's own volume. Through the character of Theseus, especially, and in the structure of the play, more generally, Shakespeare replies to Southwell. Shakespeare doesn't simply reject Southwell, but rather evokes an understanding of piety and poetry consistent with the pre-Reformation, late medieval Church. This understanding is one that allows room for juxtaposing the sacred and the profane as opposed to championing one at the expense of the other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ben Jonson Journal
Ben Jonson Journal LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
80.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Rebecca M. Rush, The Fetters of Rhyme: Liberty and Poetic Form in Early Modern England Transcending Justice, Transcending Human Control: Overarching Providence in Shakespeare's Comedies and Romances Ben Jonson Journal Literary Awards The English Renaissance Playwright’s Classical Encyclopedia: The Lectiones Antiquae of Caelius Rhodiginus as a Resource for Jonson and Chapman Epicene and the Bearded Woman Saint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1