行业分类在IT业务价值研究中重要吗?

Duane B. Kennedy, Byron Y. Song, Theophanis C. Stratopoulos
{"title":"行业分类在IT业务价值研究中重要吗?","authors":"Duane B. Kennedy, Byron Y. Song, Theophanis C. Stratopoulos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3919658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies which examine the effect of IT on firm performance make the implicit assumption that the choice of industry classification (e.g., SIC instead of NAICS) and the level of aggregation (e.g., 2-digit SIC instead of 4-digit SIC) is unlikely to affect the results. Given that practically none of the studies in our literature review has tested the robustness of their results to an alternative industry classification method, we do not know whether this choice matters (i.e., we don’t know whether the evidence generated from this stream of research is robust). To answer this question, we replicated three studies (Bharadwaj 2000; Chae et al. 2014; Santhanam and Hartono 2003) and found that results are likely to differ if we change the classification method and/or the level of aggregation within a given industry classification method. We encourage IT researchers to replicate prior studies to assess the sensitivity of their results to such choices as well as encouraging future studies to consider implementing robustness checks. The need to consider such robustness checks spans all fields (e.g., accounting, strategic management, and marketing) that use statistical analysis which requires control for role of industry.","PeriodicalId":11837,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Industry Classification Matter in IT Business Value Research?\",\"authors\":\"Duane B. Kennedy, Byron Y. Song, Theophanis C. Stratopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3919658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies which examine the effect of IT on firm performance make the implicit assumption that the choice of industry classification (e.g., SIC instead of NAICS) and the level of aggregation (e.g., 2-digit SIC instead of 4-digit SIC) is unlikely to affect the results. Given that practically none of the studies in our literature review has tested the robustness of their results to an alternative industry classification method, we do not know whether this choice matters (i.e., we don’t know whether the evidence generated from this stream of research is robust). To answer this question, we replicated three studies (Bharadwaj 2000; Chae et al. 2014; Santhanam and Hartono 2003) and found that results are likely to differ if we change the classification method and/or the level of aggregation within a given industry classification method. We encourage IT researchers to replicate prior studies to assess the sensitivity of their results to such choices as well as encouraging future studies to consider implementing robustness checks. The need to consider such robustness checks spans all fields (e.g., accounting, strategic management, and marketing) that use statistical analysis which requires control for role of industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

检验信息技术对企业绩效影响的研究隐含了一个假设,即行业分类的选择(例如,使用SIC而不是NAICS)和聚合水平(例如,使用2位数的SIC而不是4位数的SIC)不太可能影响结果。鉴于我们的文献综述中几乎没有一项研究对另一种行业分类方法的结果进行了稳健性测试,我们不知道这种选择是否重要(即,我们不知道从这一研究流中产生的证据是否可靠)。为了回答这个问题,我们重复了三项研究(Bharadwaj 2000;Chae et al. 2014;Santhanam and Hartono 2003),并发现如果我们改变分类方法和/或给定行业分类方法内的聚合水平,结果可能会有所不同。我们鼓励IT研究人员重复先前的研究,以评估其结果对这些选择的敏感性,并鼓励未来的研究考虑实施稳健性检查。考虑这种稳健性检查的需要跨越所有使用统计分析的领域(例如,会计,战略管理和市场营销),这需要对行业角色进行控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Industry Classification Matter in IT Business Value Research?
Studies which examine the effect of IT on firm performance make the implicit assumption that the choice of industry classification (e.g., SIC instead of NAICS) and the level of aggregation (e.g., 2-digit SIC instead of 4-digit SIC) is unlikely to affect the results. Given that practically none of the studies in our literature review has tested the robustness of their results to an alternative industry classification method, we do not know whether this choice matters (i.e., we don’t know whether the evidence generated from this stream of research is robust). To answer this question, we replicated three studies (Bharadwaj 2000; Chae et al. 2014; Santhanam and Hartono 2003) and found that results are likely to differ if we change the classification method and/or the level of aggregation within a given industry classification method. We encourage IT researchers to replicate prior studies to assess the sensitivity of their results to such choices as well as encouraging future studies to consider implementing robustness checks. The need to consider such robustness checks spans all fields (e.g., accounting, strategic management, and marketing) that use statistical analysis which requires control for role of industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Preference Heterogeneity Within and Across Behavioral Types: Evidence from a Real-world Betting Market The economics of movies (revisited): A decade of literature in review Does Industry Classification Matter in IT Business Value Research? A Simple Method to Estimate Discrete-type Random Coefficients Logit Models Intermittent versus Dispatchable Power Sources: An Integrated Competitive Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1