广泛巴雷特食道腹腔镜酸抑制与十二指肠分流术:短期和长期的结果和并发症

Italo Braghetto, Attila Csendes, Manuel Figueroa, Juan Pablo Lasnibat, Jaime Vásquez, Ramon Torres, Nicolas Von Jentschyk, Stefano Biancardi, Vivian Parada
{"title":"广泛巴雷特食道腹腔镜酸抑制与十二指肠分流术:短期和长期的结果和并发症","authors":"Italo Braghetto,&nbsp;Attila Csendes,&nbsp;Manuel Figueroa,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Lasnibat,&nbsp;Jaime Vásquez,&nbsp;Ramon Torres,&nbsp;Nicolas Von Jentschyk,&nbsp;Stefano Biancardi,&nbsp;Vivian Parada","doi":"10.1016/j.rchic.2017.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In patients with long Barrett esophagus we have suggested to perform fundoplication with antrectomy, vagotomy and Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion however it could be associated with complications and side effects.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study is to compare open versus laparoscopic surgery for early and early postoperative complications, mortality and distant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>We compare 2 cohorts of patients, 73 patients with open surgery and 53 patients, who underwent laparoscopic surgery using the same technique. Only patients with Long Barrett were included. They are clinically monitored in the early and late postoperative period, with endoscopy and histology at long term follow-up (3-5 years). The results were evaluated in terms of early and late complications, the quality of life and patient satisfaction were analyzed. For the analysis we used t-student considering a <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05 as significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As for early complications, there were no significant differences in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. In the late complications, the total complications are not significantly different between the two groups (only their causes and characteristics changed) neither in terms of Visick's classification and the quality of life score</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The fundoplication, with laparoscopic acid suppression and duodenal diversion, presents similar short-term and long-term results than open surgery, with the benefits of a mini-invasive procedure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49615,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena De Cirugia","volume":"69 6","pages":"Pages 452-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rchic.2017.05.007","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cirugía de supresión ácida y derivación duodenal laparoscópica vs abierta en esófago de Barrett extenso: resultados y complicaciones a corto y largo plazo\",\"authors\":\"Italo Braghetto,&nbsp;Attila Csendes,&nbsp;Manuel Figueroa,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Lasnibat,&nbsp;Jaime Vásquez,&nbsp;Ramon Torres,&nbsp;Nicolas Von Jentschyk,&nbsp;Stefano Biancardi,&nbsp;Vivian Parada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rchic.2017.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In patients with long Barrett esophagus we have suggested to perform fundoplication with antrectomy, vagotomy and Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion however it could be associated with complications and side effects.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study is to compare open versus laparoscopic surgery for early and early postoperative complications, mortality and distant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>We compare 2 cohorts of patients, 73 patients with open surgery and 53 patients, who underwent laparoscopic surgery using the same technique. Only patients with Long Barrett were included. They are clinically monitored in the early and late postoperative period, with endoscopy and histology at long term follow-up (3-5 years). The results were evaluated in terms of early and late complications, the quality of life and patient satisfaction were analyzed. For the analysis we used t-student considering a <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05 as significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As for early complications, there were no significant differences in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. In the late complications, the total complications are not significantly different between the two groups (only their causes and characteristics changed) neither in terms of Visick's classification and the quality of life score</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The fundoplication, with laparoscopic acid suppression and duodenal diversion, presents similar short-term and long-term results than open surgery, with the benefits of a mini-invasive procedure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena De Cirugia\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 452-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rchic.2017.05.007\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena De Cirugia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379389317301059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena De Cirugia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379389317301059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对于Barrett食管较长的患者,我们建议行胃底吻合联合前切开术、迷走神经切开术和Roux-en-Y十二指肠分流术,但这可能会带来并发症和副作用。本研究的目的是比较开放手术与腹腔镜手术在早期和早期术后并发症、死亡率和远期预后方面的差异。材料和方法我们比较了两组患者,73例开放手术患者和53例使用相同技术进行腹腔镜手术的患者。只包括Long Barrett患者。术后早期和晚期进行临床监测,长期随访(3-5年)进行内窥镜检查和组织学检查。从早期和晚期并发症、生活质量和患者满意度等方面对结果进行评价。为了进行分析,我们使用了考虑P <0.05为显著性。结果两组患者早期并发症发生率无明显差异。无术后死亡率。在后期并发症方面,两组的总并发症在Visick's分类和生活质量评分方面均无显著差异(仅发生原因和特征改变)。结论腹腔镜下抑酸十二指肠分流的底瓣复制术与开放手术的近期和远期效果相似,且具有微创手术的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cirugía de supresión ácida y derivación duodenal laparoscópica vs abierta en esófago de Barrett extenso: resultados y complicaciones a corto y largo plazo

Introduction

In patients with long Barrett esophagus we have suggested to perform fundoplication with antrectomy, vagotomy and Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion however it could be associated with complications and side effects.

Objective

The objective of this study is to compare open versus laparoscopic surgery for early and early postoperative complications, mortality and distant outcomes.

Material and method

We compare 2 cohorts of patients, 73 patients with open surgery and 53 patients, who underwent laparoscopic surgery using the same technique. Only patients with Long Barrett were included. They are clinically monitored in the early and late postoperative period, with endoscopy and histology at long term follow-up (3-5 years). The results were evaluated in terms of early and late complications, the quality of life and patient satisfaction were analyzed. For the analysis we used t-student considering a P < .05 as significant.

Results

As for early complications, there were no significant differences in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. In the late complications, the total complications are not significantly different between the two groups (only their causes and characteristics changed) neither in terms of Visick's classification and the quality of life score

Conclusion

The fundoplication, with laparoscopic acid suppression and duodenal diversion, presents similar short-term and long-term results than open surgery, with the benefits of a mini-invasive procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Chilena De Cirugia
Revista Chilena De Cirugia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Chilena de Cirugía es un órgano de difusión del conocimiento y actividad quirúrgica. Su población objetivo son cirujanos, especialistas de otras áreas médicas, médicos generales y alumnos del área de la salud. Sirve a cirujanos y otros especialistas, para publicar artículos originales e inéditos sobre temas médicos, en particular artículos de investigación básica y clínica, artículos de revisión, entre otros. Buscan difundir y actualizar el conocimiento médico general y quirúrgico en particular. Se publica en forma bimestral. La Revista Chilena de Cirugía está afiliada y patrocinada por la Sociedad de Cirujanos de Chilese desde el año 1952.
期刊最新文献
Sepsis por fístula paraprotésico entérica Evaluación comparativa en calidad de vida de pacientes con RAUB, RAUBIE vs RAP por cáncer de recto. Informe preliminar Linfedema asociado al cáncer de mama: factores de riesgo, diagnóstico y tratamiento quirúrgico Distribución nerviosa interna del músculo temporal humano: consideraciones anatómicas y quirúrgicas Factores de riesgo asociados a la hernia inguinal recurrente en el adulto mayor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1