两面派:《大独裁者》和《成吉思汗》中的犹太人身份问题

IF 0.1 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1353/jfn.2021.0006
A. Pogorelskin
{"title":"两面派:《大独裁者》和《成吉思汗》中的犹太人身份问题","authors":"A. Pogorelskin","doi":"10.1353/jfn.2021.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay investigates what the author argues are two cinematic explorations of Jewish identity: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (1940) and Roman Gary’s Genghis Cohn (1994) as rendered by the director Elijah Moshinsky. Each film addresses, at times satirizes, the frightening possibilities attendant on Jewish identity. On one level, Chaplin parodies Hitler. He also parodies Goebbels. Moshinsky parodies the barely repressed Nazism, in the closet or just beneath the surface, in post-war Germany. Combining coincidence and resemblance, Chaplin’s Barber character assumes the identity of the Dictator Hynkel and in an address to the nation apologizes for the Beloved Phooey’s policies. But in Chaplin’s rendering, the ersatz Dictator remains a Jew. Moshinsky depicts a Jewish comedian executed in 1943 inextricably linked to his executioner, SS officer Otto Schatz. The two become one, not by coincidence, but by seeming intention on Cohn’s part, both to haunt Schatz and to turn him into a Jew. Chaplin’s film operates as a prediction, Gary’s as a memory. Both films, however, argue identity, especially Jewish identity, even when hidden, waits only to resurface.","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"113 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-Crossed: Questions of Jewish Identity in The Great Dictator and Genghis Cohn\",\"authors\":\"A. Pogorelskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jfn.2021.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This essay investigates what the author argues are two cinematic explorations of Jewish identity: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (1940) and Roman Gary’s Genghis Cohn (1994) as rendered by the director Elijah Moshinsky. Each film addresses, at times satirizes, the frightening possibilities attendant on Jewish identity. On one level, Chaplin parodies Hitler. He also parodies Goebbels. Moshinsky parodies the barely repressed Nazism, in the closet or just beneath the surface, in post-war Germany. Combining coincidence and resemblance, Chaplin’s Barber character assumes the identity of the Dictator Hynkel and in an address to the nation apologizes for the Beloved Phooey’s policies. But in Chaplin’s rendering, the ersatz Dictator remains a Jew. Moshinsky depicts a Jewish comedian executed in 1943 inextricably linked to his executioner, SS officer Otto Schatz. The two become one, not by coincidence, but by seeming intention on Cohn’s part, both to haunt Schatz and to turn him into a Jew. Chaplin’s film operates as a prediction, Gary’s as a memory. Both films, however, argue identity, especially Jewish identity, even when hidden, waits only to resurface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jfn.2021.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jfn.2021.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了查理·卓别林的《大独裁者》(1940)和导演伊莱贾·莫辛斯基导演罗曼·加里的《成吉思汗》(1994)两部对犹太人身份的电影探索。每部电影都提到,有时是讽刺,犹太人身份带来的可怕可能性。在某种程度上,卓别林模仿希特勒。他还模仿戈培尔。莫辛斯基模仿了战后德国几乎没有被压制的纳粹主义,无论是在橱柜里还是在表面之下。巧合和相似的是,卓别林饰演的理发师扮演了独裁者海因克尔的角色,并在向全国发表讲话时为亲爱的菲的政策道歉。但在卓别林的演绎中,这个冒牌的独裁者仍然是犹太人。莫辛斯基描绘了一个1943年被处决的犹太喜剧演员与他的刽子手、党卫军军官奥托·沙茨(Otto Schatz)有着千丝万缕的联系。这两个人合二为一,不是巧合,而是科恩似乎有意要缠住沙茨,把他变成一个犹太人。卓别林的电影是一种预言,而加里的电影是一种回忆。然而,两部电影都在争论身份,尤其是犹太人的身份,即使隐藏起来,也只会等待重新浮出水面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Double-Crossed: Questions of Jewish Identity in The Great Dictator and Genghis Cohn
ABSTRACT:This essay investigates what the author argues are two cinematic explorations of Jewish identity: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (1940) and Roman Gary’s Genghis Cohn (1994) as rendered by the director Elijah Moshinsky. Each film addresses, at times satirizes, the frightening possibilities attendant on Jewish identity. On one level, Chaplin parodies Hitler. He also parodies Goebbels. Moshinsky parodies the barely repressed Nazism, in the closet or just beneath the surface, in post-war Germany. Combining coincidence and resemblance, Chaplin’s Barber character assumes the identity of the Dictator Hynkel and in an address to the nation apologizes for the Beloved Phooey’s policies. But in Chaplin’s rendering, the ersatz Dictator remains a Jew. Moshinsky depicts a Jewish comedian executed in 1943 inextricably linked to his executioner, SS officer Otto Schatz. The two become one, not by coincidence, but by seeming intention on Cohn’s part, both to haunt Schatz and to turn him into a Jew. Chaplin’s film operates as a prediction, Gary’s as a memory. Both films, however, argue identity, especially Jewish identity, even when hidden, waits only to resurface.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Jewish Film & New Media provides an outlet for research into any aspect of Jewish film, television, and new media and is unique in its interdisciplinary nature, exploring the rich and diverse cultural heritage across the globe. The journal is distinctive in bringing together a range of cinemas, televisions, films, programs, and other digital material in one volume and in its positioning of the discussions within a range of contexts—the cultural, historical, textual, and many others.
期刊最新文献
Alex Korda’s Battleground: The Ghost Goes West: Authorship, Jewishness, and Émigré Filmmakers in mid-1930s Britain ReFocus: The Films of Elaine May ed. by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas and Dean Brandum (review) Giraffes on Horseback Salad: Salvador Dalí, the Marx Brothers, and the Strangest Movie Never Made by Josh Frank and Tim Heidecker (review) Steven Spielberg: Interviews, Revised and Updated ed. by Brent Notbohm and Lester D. Friedman (review) Body, Ethnicity, and Gender in Video Art Works of Three Mizrahi-Masorti Women Artists in Post-Secular Israel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1