{"title":"两面派:《大独裁者》和《成吉思汗》中的犹太人身份问题","authors":"A. Pogorelskin","doi":"10.1353/jfn.2021.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay investigates what the author argues are two cinematic explorations of Jewish identity: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (1940) and Roman Gary’s Genghis Cohn (1994) as rendered by the director Elijah Moshinsky. Each film addresses, at times satirizes, the frightening possibilities attendant on Jewish identity. On one level, Chaplin parodies Hitler. He also parodies Goebbels. Moshinsky parodies the barely repressed Nazism, in the closet or just beneath the surface, in post-war Germany. Combining coincidence and resemblance, Chaplin’s Barber character assumes the identity of the Dictator Hynkel and in an address to the nation apologizes for the Beloved Phooey’s policies. But in Chaplin’s rendering, the ersatz Dictator remains a Jew. Moshinsky depicts a Jewish comedian executed in 1943 inextricably linked to his executioner, SS officer Otto Schatz. The two become one, not by coincidence, but by seeming intention on Cohn’s part, both to haunt Schatz and to turn him into a Jew. Chaplin’s film operates as a prediction, Gary’s as a memory. Both films, however, argue identity, especially Jewish identity, even when hidden, waits only to resurface.","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"113 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-Crossed: Questions of Jewish Identity in The Great Dictator and Genghis Cohn\",\"authors\":\"A. Pogorelskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jfn.2021.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This essay investigates what the author argues are two cinematic explorations of Jewish identity: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (1940) and Roman Gary’s Genghis Cohn (1994) as rendered by the director Elijah Moshinsky. Each film addresses, at times satirizes, the frightening possibilities attendant on Jewish identity. On one level, Chaplin parodies Hitler. He also parodies Goebbels. Moshinsky parodies the barely repressed Nazism, in the closet or just beneath the surface, in post-war Germany. Combining coincidence and resemblance, Chaplin’s Barber character assumes the identity of the Dictator Hynkel and in an address to the nation apologizes for the Beloved Phooey’s policies. But in Chaplin’s rendering, the ersatz Dictator remains a Jew. Moshinsky depicts a Jewish comedian executed in 1943 inextricably linked to his executioner, SS officer Otto Schatz. The two become one, not by coincidence, but by seeming intention on Cohn’s part, both to haunt Schatz and to turn him into a Jew. Chaplin’s film operates as a prediction, Gary’s as a memory. Both films, however, argue identity, especially Jewish identity, even when hidden, waits only to resurface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jfn.2021.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jfn.2021.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Double-Crossed: Questions of Jewish Identity in The Great Dictator and Genghis Cohn
ABSTRACT:This essay investigates what the author argues are two cinematic explorations of Jewish identity: Charlie Chaplin’s The Great Dictator (1940) and Roman Gary’s Genghis Cohn (1994) as rendered by the director Elijah Moshinsky. Each film addresses, at times satirizes, the frightening possibilities attendant on Jewish identity. On one level, Chaplin parodies Hitler. He also parodies Goebbels. Moshinsky parodies the barely repressed Nazism, in the closet or just beneath the surface, in post-war Germany. Combining coincidence and resemblance, Chaplin’s Barber character assumes the identity of the Dictator Hynkel and in an address to the nation apologizes for the Beloved Phooey’s policies. But in Chaplin’s rendering, the ersatz Dictator remains a Jew. Moshinsky depicts a Jewish comedian executed in 1943 inextricably linked to his executioner, SS officer Otto Schatz. The two become one, not by coincidence, but by seeming intention on Cohn’s part, both to haunt Schatz and to turn him into a Jew. Chaplin’s film operates as a prediction, Gary’s as a memory. Both films, however, argue identity, especially Jewish identity, even when hidden, waits only to resurface.
期刊介绍:
Jewish Film & New Media provides an outlet for research into any aspect of Jewish film, television, and new media and is unique in its interdisciplinary nature, exploring the rich and diverse cultural heritage across the globe. The journal is distinctive in bringing together a range of cinemas, televisions, films, programs, and other digital material in one volume and in its positioning of the discussions within a range of contexts—the cultural, historical, textual, and many others.