英国皇家斯托克大学医院(RSUH)降低COPD相关再入院率:质量改进项目

M. Marathe, K. Leech, H. Stone, I. Hussain
{"title":"英国皇家斯托克大学医院(RSUH)降低COPD相关再入院率:质量改进项目","authors":"M. Marathe, K. Leech, H. Stone, I. Hussain","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reducing the number of readmissions after an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) remains a challenge. A number of strategies have been shown to reduce early readmission including early outpatient follow up and the use of validated scoring systems to highlight patients at high risk of readmission. The aim of our ongoing project is to reduce the readmission rate of above 40% to the National COPD audit average of 23%. Our initial intervention was to increasing the number of patients seen by the community respiratory team (CRT). Methods: From April 2018 we referred an increasing number of patients admitted with AECOPD to the CRT upon discharge. Our efforts were initially aimed at patients with PEARL scores above 5. We used pre-existing data sheets, already utilised for the national audit, to record referral data. The patients’ electronic records were then analysed 90 days after discharge to determine time to re-admission. Two cycles of analysis were completed 90 days after the April and May discharges. Results: The 90 day readmission rate owing to COPD for patients admitted in March 2018 fell from 46% to 35% and 40% for patients admitted in April and May respectively. The number of referrals for high risk patients (PEARL above 5) increased every month but in May, lower risk (PEARL less than 5) had a higher rate of referrals as well. Conclusion: Our QIP has shown promising results with some reduction in readmission rates after higher referral rates to the CRT. This is likely due to early management of unstable symptoms and exacerbations. More work is required in developing a fully integrated approach and analysing the effectiveness of different community therapies.","PeriodicalId":76252,"journal":{"name":"Nurses Lamp","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing COPD related readmission rates at Royal Stoke University Hospital (RSUH), UK: a Quality Improvement Project\",\"authors\":\"M. Marathe, K. Leech, H. Stone, I. Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Reducing the number of readmissions after an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) remains a challenge. A number of strategies have been shown to reduce early readmission including early outpatient follow up and the use of validated scoring systems to highlight patients at high risk of readmission. The aim of our ongoing project is to reduce the readmission rate of above 40% to the National COPD audit average of 23%. Our initial intervention was to increasing the number of patients seen by the community respiratory team (CRT). Methods: From April 2018 we referred an increasing number of patients admitted with AECOPD to the CRT upon discharge. Our efforts were initially aimed at patients with PEARL scores above 5. We used pre-existing data sheets, already utilised for the national audit, to record referral data. The patients’ electronic records were then analysed 90 days after discharge to determine time to re-admission. Two cycles of analysis were completed 90 days after the April and May discharges. Results: The 90 day readmission rate owing to COPD for patients admitted in March 2018 fell from 46% to 35% and 40% for patients admitted in April and May respectively. The number of referrals for high risk patients (PEARL above 5) increased every month but in May, lower risk (PEARL less than 5) had a higher rate of referrals as well. Conclusion: Our QIP has shown promising results with some reduction in readmission rates after higher referral rates to the CRT. This is likely due to early management of unstable symptoms and exacerbations. More work is required in developing a fully integrated approach and analysing the effectiveness of different community therapies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurses Lamp\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurses Lamp\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurses Lamp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:减少慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重(AECOPD)后再入院的数量仍然是一个挑战。许多策略已被证明可以减少早期再入院,包括早期门诊随访和使用经过验证的评分系统来突出再入院高风险的患者。我们正在进行的项目的目标是将40%以上的再入院率降低到23%的全国慢性阻塞性肺病审计平均水平。我们最初的干预措施是增加社区呼吸小组(CRT)看到的患者数量。方法:从2018年4月开始,我们将越来越多的AECOPD患者在出院后转介到CRT。我们最初的目标是PEARL评分在5分以上的患者。我们使用已经用于国家审计的预先存在的数据表来记录转诊数据。然后分析出院后90天患者的电子记录,以确定再次入院的时间。在4月和5月出院后90天完成两个周期的分析。结果:2018年3月入院的患者因慢性阻塞性肺病90天再入院率分别从46%下降到35%,4月和5月入院的患者分别下降到40%。高危患者(PEARL大于5)的转诊率逐月增加,但5月份低危患者(PEARL小于5)的转诊率也较高。结论:我们的QIP显示出有希望的结果,在更高的转介率后,再入院率有所降低。这可能是由于不稳定症状和恶化的早期管理。在制定一种完全综合的方法和分析不同社区疗法的有效性方面,需要做更多的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reducing COPD related readmission rates at Royal Stoke University Hospital (RSUH), UK: a Quality Improvement Project
Introduction: Reducing the number of readmissions after an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) remains a challenge. A number of strategies have been shown to reduce early readmission including early outpatient follow up and the use of validated scoring systems to highlight patients at high risk of readmission. The aim of our ongoing project is to reduce the readmission rate of above 40% to the National COPD audit average of 23%. Our initial intervention was to increasing the number of patients seen by the community respiratory team (CRT). Methods: From April 2018 we referred an increasing number of patients admitted with AECOPD to the CRT upon discharge. Our efforts were initially aimed at patients with PEARL scores above 5. We used pre-existing data sheets, already utilised for the national audit, to record referral data. The patients’ electronic records were then analysed 90 days after discharge to determine time to re-admission. Two cycles of analysis were completed 90 days after the April and May discharges. Results: The 90 day readmission rate owing to COPD for patients admitted in March 2018 fell from 46% to 35% and 40% for patients admitted in April and May respectively. The number of referrals for high risk patients (PEARL above 5) increased every month but in May, lower risk (PEARL less than 5) had a higher rate of referrals as well. Conclusion: Our QIP has shown promising results with some reduction in readmission rates after higher referral rates to the CRT. This is likely due to early management of unstable symptoms and exacerbations. More work is required in developing a fully integrated approach and analysing the effectiveness of different community therapies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking COPD Exacerbations: a global patient perspective Is an informative application a suitable tool for patients in a diagnostic lung cancer program?A qualitative study Use of Clinical Nurse Specialists in the Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Health-psychologic features and health-related quality of life in persons with severe asthma The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Portuguese rehabilitation nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1