牛、羊和猪股骨的矿物特征和食品级灰分产量比较

Okwunodulu Nwazulu Innocent, Malachy Omaka, Linus-Chibuezeh Adindu, Okwunodulu Uchechukwu Felicia
{"title":"牛、羊和猪股骨的矿物特征和食品级灰分产量比较","authors":"Okwunodulu Nwazulu Innocent, Malachy Omaka, Linus-Chibuezeh Adindu, Okwunodulu Uchechukwu Felicia","doi":"10.11648/J.IJFSB.20210604.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bones are by-products of abattoir and home consumption of carcases which constitute environmental pollution that attracts houseflies and birds especially vultures in large numbers. Bone dumping is of public health concern because of the health implications but can be harnessed into food grade ash for food fortification because of their high mineral content. This work quantified and compared the mineral content of food grade ash from cow, goat and pig femur bones for uses. The bone samples were procured, sun-dried cleaned, incinerated, dry ashed and analysed for their micro and macro mineral contents using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) method. The results showed that the femur bones of cow yielded 38.02% raw ash and 10.60% dry ash, goat yielded 40.57% raw ash and 5.86% dry ash while pig yielded 35.60% raw ash and 8.99% dry ash. Results of macro minerals revealed that calcium content range of 610.63-723.16 mg/100g, sodium 2.15-4.07mg/100g, magnesium 7.18-11.23mg/100g, phosphorus 93.11-280.62 mg/100g, while potassium ranged from 2.26 to 3.47 mg/100g. Micro mineral composition showed that copper ranged from 0.001-0.004 mg/kg, iron from 0.022 -1.93 mg/kg, zinc from 0.016-0.144 mg/kg, manganese from 0.007-0.108 mg/kg and sulphur from0.078-0.311 mg/kg. All the none essential heavy metals (toxic minerals) content of the femur bone samples were lower than and recommended safe limit for human consumption and therefore safe. Cow femur bone had the best mineral composition followed by goat and pig femur bones.","PeriodicalId":14158,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology","volume":"65 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Mineral Profiles and Yields of Food Grade Ash from Cow, Goat and Pig Femur Bones\",\"authors\":\"Okwunodulu Nwazulu Innocent, Malachy Omaka, Linus-Chibuezeh Adindu, Okwunodulu Uchechukwu Felicia\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.IJFSB.20210604.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bones are by-products of abattoir and home consumption of carcases which constitute environmental pollution that attracts houseflies and birds especially vultures in large numbers. Bone dumping is of public health concern because of the health implications but can be harnessed into food grade ash for food fortification because of their high mineral content. This work quantified and compared the mineral content of food grade ash from cow, goat and pig femur bones for uses. The bone samples were procured, sun-dried cleaned, incinerated, dry ashed and analysed for their micro and macro mineral contents using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) method. The results showed that the femur bones of cow yielded 38.02% raw ash and 10.60% dry ash, goat yielded 40.57% raw ash and 5.86% dry ash while pig yielded 35.60% raw ash and 8.99% dry ash. Results of macro minerals revealed that calcium content range of 610.63-723.16 mg/100g, sodium 2.15-4.07mg/100g, magnesium 7.18-11.23mg/100g, phosphorus 93.11-280.62 mg/100g, while potassium ranged from 2.26 to 3.47 mg/100g. Micro mineral composition showed that copper ranged from 0.001-0.004 mg/kg, iron from 0.022 -1.93 mg/kg, zinc from 0.016-0.144 mg/kg, manganese from 0.007-0.108 mg/kg and sulphur from0.078-0.311 mg/kg. All the none essential heavy metals (toxic minerals) content of the femur bone samples were lower than and recommended safe limit for human consumption and therefore safe. Cow femur bone had the best mineral composition followed by goat and pig femur bones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"65 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJFSB.20210604.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJFSB.20210604.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨头是屠宰场和家庭食用尸体的副产品,对环境造成污染,吸引了大量家蝇和鸟类,特别是秃鹫。由于对健康的影响,骨倾倒是一个令人关注的公共卫生问题,但由于其矿物质含量高,可以利用成食品级灰分用于食品强化。本研究量化并比较了牛、羊和猪股骨中食品级灰分的矿物含量。采集骨标本,晒干、清洗、焚烧、干灰,并用原子吸收分光光度计(AAS)法分析其微量和宏观矿物质含量。结果表明:牛大腿骨粗灰分含量为38.02%,干灰分含量为10.60%;山羊大腿骨粗灰分含量为40.57%,干灰分含量为5.86%;猪大腿骨粗灰分含量为35.60%,干灰分含量为8.99%。宏量矿物含量范围为610.63 ~ 723.16 mg/100g,钠含量为2.15 ~ 4.07mg/100g,镁含量为7.18 ~ 11.23mg/100g,磷含量为93.11 ~ 280.62 mg/100g,钾含量为2.26 ~ 3.47 mg/100g。微量矿物组成表明,铜为0.001 ~ 0.004 mg/kg,铁为0.022 ~ 1.93 mg/kg,锌为0.016 ~ 0.144 mg/kg,锰为0.007 ~ 0.108 mg/kg,硫为0.078 ~ 0.311 mg/kg。股骨样本中所有非必需重金属(有毒矿物质)含量均低于建议的人类食用安全限量,因此是安全的。牛股骨矿物成分最好,其次是山羊和猪股骨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Mineral Profiles and Yields of Food Grade Ash from Cow, Goat and Pig Femur Bones
Bones are by-products of abattoir and home consumption of carcases which constitute environmental pollution that attracts houseflies and birds especially vultures in large numbers. Bone dumping is of public health concern because of the health implications but can be harnessed into food grade ash for food fortification because of their high mineral content. This work quantified and compared the mineral content of food grade ash from cow, goat and pig femur bones for uses. The bone samples were procured, sun-dried cleaned, incinerated, dry ashed and analysed for their micro and macro mineral contents using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) method. The results showed that the femur bones of cow yielded 38.02% raw ash and 10.60% dry ash, goat yielded 40.57% raw ash and 5.86% dry ash while pig yielded 35.60% raw ash and 8.99% dry ash. Results of macro minerals revealed that calcium content range of 610.63-723.16 mg/100g, sodium 2.15-4.07mg/100g, magnesium 7.18-11.23mg/100g, phosphorus 93.11-280.62 mg/100g, while potassium ranged from 2.26 to 3.47 mg/100g. Micro mineral composition showed that copper ranged from 0.001-0.004 mg/kg, iron from 0.022 -1.93 mg/kg, zinc from 0.016-0.144 mg/kg, manganese from 0.007-0.108 mg/kg and sulphur from0.078-0.311 mg/kg. All the none essential heavy metals (toxic minerals) content of the femur bone samples were lower than and recommended safe limit for human consumption and therefore safe. Cow femur bone had the best mineral composition followed by goat and pig femur bones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Antibiotics in Milk from Smallholder Farmers from Kenya Shows Traces Above the Recommended Maximum Residue Limits Milling and Bread-Making Traits Associated with Grain Hardness in Ethiopian Bread Wheat Varieties Grown Under Bale Condition Fermented Bamboo Shoot Health Benefits and Applications Development and Shelf-Life Assessment of Fish Sticks Using Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idella) The Science of Food Fortification in Improving Health Challenges Due to Iron Deficiency Anemia and Zinc Deficiency for Children Under 5 Years in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1