{"title":"客座专栏:算术电路下界的一个范例","authors":"N. Kayal, Chandan Saha","doi":"10.1145/3197406.3197416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How many operations are needed to compute a given polynomial f(x1; x2; : : : ; xn)? Answering questions of this form naturally leads us on a search for clever algorithmic techniques to reduce the number of operations required. Simultaneously, it also leads us towards the complementary task of finding techniques and paradigms for proving lower bounds on the minimum number of operations required. In this survey we describe one such paradigm for obtaining lower bounds.","PeriodicalId":22106,"journal":{"name":"SIGACT News","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guest Column: A Paradigm for Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds\",\"authors\":\"N. Kayal, Chandan Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3197406.3197416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How many operations are needed to compute a given polynomial f(x1; x2; : : : ; xn)? Answering questions of this form naturally leads us on a search for clever algorithmic techniques to reduce the number of operations required. Simultaneously, it also leads us towards the complementary task of finding techniques and paradigms for proving lower bounds on the minimum number of operations required. In this survey we describe one such paradigm for obtaining lower bounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGACT News\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGACT News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3197406.3197416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGACT News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3197406.3197416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Guest Column: A Paradigm for Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds
How many operations are needed to compute a given polynomial f(x1; x2; : : : ; xn)? Answering questions of this form naturally leads us on a search for clever algorithmic techniques to reduce the number of operations required. Simultaneously, it also leads us towards the complementary task of finding techniques and paradigms for proving lower bounds on the minimum number of operations required. In this survey we describe one such paradigm for obtaining lower bounds.