英国食品卫生法规和执行政策:基本理念和与职业健康和安全法的比较

Michael T. Howard
{"title":"英国食品卫生法规和执行政策:基本理念和与职业健康和安全法的比较","authors":"Michael T. Howard","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00091.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Editor’s preface</h3>\n \n <p> <i>Dr Michael Howard is a Lecturer in Environmental Health at King’s College London specializing in environmental health law and compliance strategies.</i> </p>\n \n <p> <i>He has undertaken a considerable amount of research into occupational health and safety, and food hygiene regulation. He is particularly interested in the approaches that regulators and enforcement agencies can use to promote an understanding and consensus with businesses that need to comply with the law.</i> </p>\n \n <p> <i>In this paper he proposes and argues that the philosophy of self-regulation, which underpins occupational health and safety legislation in the UK, is adopted for food hygiene legislation. This notion will undoubtedly be opposed by some and alternative views on this subject are welcomed, particularly from outside the UK.</i> </p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>This paper suggests that there is no specific underlying philosophy for food hygiene law in the UK. It describes the philosophy of self-regulation which underlies UK occupational health and safety law, and addresses the question of why this has not been adopted for food law. The paper also describes the recent and continuing developments in food law, some of which move towards a self-regulatory approach. It is argued that a self-regulatory approach would provide a more appropriate form of regulation than the command and control approach which is currently applied. A major benefit of this would be that self-regulatory systems are likely to be more effective in controlling food safety management failures, the most common cause of food borne disease. Furthermore, this would remove the inconsistency that exists at present between the food hygiene and occupational health and safety regulatory systems. It is argued that a consistent regulatory approach would benefit duty holders and enforcement agencies. It is suggested that the main reasons for the absence of a clear philosophical basis for UK food safety law are historical.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100547,"journal":{"name":"Food Service Technology","volume":"4 2","pages":"69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00091.x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food hygiene regulation and enforcement policy in the UK: the underlying philosophy and comparisons with occupational health and safety law\",\"authors\":\"Michael T. Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00091.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Editor’s preface</h3>\\n \\n <p> <i>Dr Michael Howard is a Lecturer in Environmental Health at King’s College London specializing in environmental health law and compliance strategies.</i> </p>\\n \\n <p> <i>He has undertaken a considerable amount of research into occupational health and safety, and food hygiene regulation. He is particularly interested in the approaches that regulators and enforcement agencies can use to promote an understanding and consensus with businesses that need to comply with the law.</i> </p>\\n \\n <p> <i>In this paper he proposes and argues that the philosophy of self-regulation, which underpins occupational health and safety legislation in the UK, is adopted for food hygiene legislation. This notion will undoubtedly be opposed by some and alternative views on this subject are welcomed, particularly from outside the UK.</i> </p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n \\n <p>This paper suggests that there is no specific underlying philosophy for food hygiene law in the UK. It describes the philosophy of self-regulation which underlies UK occupational health and safety law, and addresses the question of why this has not been adopted for food law. The paper also describes the recent and continuing developments in food law, some of which move towards a self-regulatory approach. It is argued that a self-regulatory approach would provide a more appropriate form of regulation than the command and control approach which is currently applied. A major benefit of this would be that self-regulatory systems are likely to be more effective in controlling food safety management failures, the most common cause of food borne disease. Furthermore, this would remove the inconsistency that exists at present between the food hygiene and occupational health and safety regulatory systems. It is argued that a consistent regulatory approach would benefit duty holders and enforcement agencies. It is suggested that the main reasons for the absence of a clear philosophical basis for UK food safety law are historical.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Service Technology\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"69-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00091.x\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Service Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00091.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Service Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-5740.2004.00091.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

迈克尔·霍华德博士是伦敦国王学院环境卫生学讲师,专攻环境卫生法和合规策略。他在职业健康和安全以及食品卫生法规方面进行了大量的研究。他对监管机构和执法机构可以用来促进与需要遵守法律的企业的理解和共识的方法特别感兴趣。在这篇论文中,他提出并认为,自我监管的理念,这是英国职业健康和安全立法的基础,在食品卫生立法中被采用。这一观点无疑会遭到一些人的反对,而关于这一问题的其他观点则受到欢迎,尤其是来自英国以外的观点。本文认为,在英国,食品卫生法没有具体的基本理念。它描述了作为英国职业健康和安全法基础的自我监管理念,并解决了为什么食品法没有采用这一理念的问题。本文还描述了食品法最近和持续的发展,其中一些走向自我监管的方法。有人认为,与目前采用的指挥和控制办法相比,自我管制办法将提供一种更为适当的管制形式。这样做的一个主要好处是,自我监管系统可能更有效地控制食品安全管理失误,这是食源性疾病的最常见原因。此外,这将消除目前存在的食品卫生和职业健康安全监管体系之间的不一致。有人认为,一致的监管方法将有利于责任持有人和执法机构。有人认为,英国食品安全法缺乏明确的哲学基础的主要原因是历史的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Food hygiene regulation and enforcement policy in the UK: the underlying philosophy and comparisons with occupational health and safety law

Editor’s preface

Dr Michael Howard is a Lecturer in Environmental Health at King’s College London specializing in environmental health law and compliance strategies.

He has undertaken a considerable amount of research into occupational health and safety, and food hygiene regulation. He is particularly interested in the approaches that regulators and enforcement agencies can use to promote an understanding and consensus with businesses that need to comply with the law.

In this paper he proposes and argues that the philosophy of self-regulation, which underpins occupational health and safety legislation in the UK, is adopted for food hygiene legislation. This notion will undoubtedly be opposed by some and alternative views on this subject are welcomed, particularly from outside the UK.

This paper suggests that there is no specific underlying philosophy for food hygiene law in the UK. It describes the philosophy of self-regulation which underlies UK occupational health and safety law, and addresses the question of why this has not been adopted for food law. The paper also describes the recent and continuing developments in food law, some of which move towards a self-regulatory approach. It is argued that a self-regulatory approach would provide a more appropriate form of regulation than the command and control approach which is currently applied. A major benefit of this would be that self-regulatory systems are likely to be more effective in controlling food safety management failures, the most common cause of food borne disease. Furthermore, this would remove the inconsistency that exists at present between the food hygiene and occupational health and safety regulatory systems. It is argued that a consistent regulatory approach would benefit duty holders and enforcement agencies. It is suggested that the main reasons for the absence of a clear philosophical basis for UK food safety law are historical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter To The Editor Editorial Reply Reply Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1