居住在铁路附近的居民对非法侵入铁路的态度

Q3 Engineering Transactions on Transport Sciences Pub Date : 2019-07-24 DOI:10.5507/TOTS.2019.010
P. Skládaná, P. Skládaný, P. Tučka
{"title":"居住在铁路附近的居民对非法侵入铁路的态度","authors":"P. Skládaná, P. Skládaný, P. Tučka","doi":"10.5507/TOTS.2019.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trespassing on the railway is a very frequent behavior in the Czech Republic, resulting in approximately 200 deaths annually caused by train-person collisions. This paper studies the attitudes of citizens living near railways and in the immediate vicinity of one of the many illegal shortcuts. The objective of the survey was primarily to acquire information about factors contributing to decisions by various groups of residents to use or not to use an illegal shortcut. This information may be taken as a basis for implementing preventive measures, and in particular those of an awareness-raising character. The survey involved a total of 619 standardized face-to-face interviews conducted at 26 locations where an illegal shortcut occurs. Eighty-three percent of the respondents were aware that an illegal shortcut existed in the vicinity of their homes, and most were able also to describe its purpose, frequency of use, and typical users. Half of them use such shortcut themselves. The predominant reason for not using the shortcut was the absence of need, that is, it was not on their route (74%). Thirty-five percent perceived crossing the railway in the given spot as too dangerous, 7% as inconvenient, and 9% stated its illegality as the reason. Four percent of respondents who did not use the shortcut stated they feared being fined. Respondents who used the shortcut most frequently provided shortening a journey (85%) and habit (25%) as their reasons for doing so. Thirty percent of users feel worried when crossing - predominantly from fear of being hit by a train, less so because they might be fined. Answers to questions concerning general knowledge suggest the direction that awareness-raising should take. Almost 30% of the respondents believed they could cross the rails at practically any place so long as there was no sign with an explicit prohibition or a fence. Fifty-four percent considered crossing the rails to be safe if they look around first, and 70% claimed that a train can be heard well from far away. Estimates as to the numbers of victims of train-person collisions in the previous year were correct in 27% of the answers, while 53% of respondents estimated lower numbers and 20% estimated higher.","PeriodicalId":52273,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Transport Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes of inhabitants living in the vicinity of railroads on the matter of trespassing on the railway\",\"authors\":\"P. Skládaná, P. Skládaný, P. Tučka\",\"doi\":\"10.5507/TOTS.2019.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trespassing on the railway is a very frequent behavior in the Czech Republic, resulting in approximately 200 deaths annually caused by train-person collisions. This paper studies the attitudes of citizens living near railways and in the immediate vicinity of one of the many illegal shortcuts. The objective of the survey was primarily to acquire information about factors contributing to decisions by various groups of residents to use or not to use an illegal shortcut. This information may be taken as a basis for implementing preventive measures, and in particular those of an awareness-raising character. The survey involved a total of 619 standardized face-to-face interviews conducted at 26 locations where an illegal shortcut occurs. Eighty-three percent of the respondents were aware that an illegal shortcut existed in the vicinity of their homes, and most were able also to describe its purpose, frequency of use, and typical users. Half of them use such shortcut themselves. The predominant reason for not using the shortcut was the absence of need, that is, it was not on their route (74%). Thirty-five percent perceived crossing the railway in the given spot as too dangerous, 7% as inconvenient, and 9% stated its illegality as the reason. Four percent of respondents who did not use the shortcut stated they feared being fined. Respondents who used the shortcut most frequently provided shortening a journey (85%) and habit (25%) as their reasons for doing so. Thirty percent of users feel worried when crossing - predominantly from fear of being hit by a train, less so because they might be fined. Answers to questions concerning general knowledge suggest the direction that awareness-raising should take. Almost 30% of the respondents believed they could cross the rails at practically any place so long as there was no sign with an explicit prohibition or a fence. Fifty-four percent considered crossing the rails to be safe if they look around first, and 70% claimed that a train can be heard well from far away. Estimates as to the numbers of victims of train-person collisions in the previous year were correct in 27% of the answers, while 53% of respondents estimated lower numbers and 20% estimated higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions on Transport Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions on Transport Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5507/TOTS.2019.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Transport Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/TOTS.2019.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在捷克共和国,擅闯铁路是一种非常频繁的行为,每年约有200人因火车与人相撞而死亡。本文研究了居住在铁路附近和众多非法捷径之一附近的市民的态度。调查的主要目的是获取有关各群体居民决定使用或不使用非法捷径的因素的信息。这些资料可作为执行预防措施的基础,特别是那些具有提高认识性质的措施。该调查共涉及619个标准化的面对面访谈,在26个存在非法捷径的地点进行。83%的受访者知道他们家附近有一条非法捷径,大多数人还能描述出它的用途、使用频率和典型用户。他们中有一半人自己使用这种捷径。不使用捷径的主要原因是没有需要,也就是说,它不在他们的路线上(74%)。35%的人认为在指定地点过铁路太危险,7%的人认为不方便,9%的人认为这是非法的。4%没有使用快捷方式的受访者表示,他们担心被罚款。最常使用快捷方式的受访者表示缩短行程(85%)和习惯(25%)是他们这样做的原因。30%的用户在过马路时会感到担心,主要是因为害怕被火车撞到,较少的是因为他们可能会被罚款。对有关常识的问题的回答表明了提高认识应该采取的方向。近30%的受访者认为,只要没有明确的禁止标志或围栏,他们几乎可以在任何地方越过铁轨。54%的人认为如果他们先环顾四周,过铁轨是安全的,70%的人声称从很远的地方就能听到火车的声音。27%的受访者对前一年火车相撞事故受害者人数的估计是正确的,而53%的受访者估计的数字较低,20%的受访者估计的数字较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes of inhabitants living in the vicinity of railroads on the matter of trespassing on the railway
Trespassing on the railway is a very frequent behavior in the Czech Republic, resulting in approximately 200 deaths annually caused by train-person collisions. This paper studies the attitudes of citizens living near railways and in the immediate vicinity of one of the many illegal shortcuts. The objective of the survey was primarily to acquire information about factors contributing to decisions by various groups of residents to use or not to use an illegal shortcut. This information may be taken as a basis for implementing preventive measures, and in particular those of an awareness-raising character. The survey involved a total of 619 standardized face-to-face interviews conducted at 26 locations where an illegal shortcut occurs. Eighty-three percent of the respondents were aware that an illegal shortcut existed in the vicinity of their homes, and most were able also to describe its purpose, frequency of use, and typical users. Half of them use such shortcut themselves. The predominant reason for not using the shortcut was the absence of need, that is, it was not on their route (74%). Thirty-five percent perceived crossing the railway in the given spot as too dangerous, 7% as inconvenient, and 9% stated its illegality as the reason. Four percent of respondents who did not use the shortcut stated they feared being fined. Respondents who used the shortcut most frequently provided shortening a journey (85%) and habit (25%) as their reasons for doing so. Thirty percent of users feel worried when crossing - predominantly from fear of being hit by a train, less so because they might be fined. Answers to questions concerning general knowledge suggest the direction that awareness-raising should take. Almost 30% of the respondents believed they could cross the rails at practically any place so long as there was no sign with an explicit prohibition or a fence. Fifty-four percent considered crossing the rails to be safe if they look around first, and 70% claimed that a train can be heard well from far away. Estimates as to the numbers of victims of train-person collisions in the previous year were correct in 27% of the answers, while 53% of respondents estimated lower numbers and 20% estimated higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions on Transport Sciences
Transactions on Transport Sciences Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Shared Space Feasibility Based on Traffic-Engineering Data Exploring Lane Changing Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review of Modeling Approaches, Traffic Impacts, and Future Directions in Traffic Engineering Research Between Investment Risk and Economic Benefit: Potential Analysis for the Reactivation of the Hershey Railway in Cuba Consumer Preferences and Determinants of Transportation Mode Choice Behaviors in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles A Comprehensive Evaluation and Mitigation Approaches for Traffic-Related Noise in the Sungai Long Region, Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1