在mcdm问题和不确定条件下,选择最佳观测通道参数测量目标的定量特性

Q3 Decision Sciences Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/yjor220315017s
S. Sveshnikov, V. Bocharnikov, V. Penkovsky, Elena Dergileva
{"title":"在mcdm问题和不确定条件下,选择最佳观测通道参数测量目标的定量特性","authors":"S. Sveshnikov, V. Bocharnikov, V. Penkovsky, Elena Dergileva","doi":"10.2298/yjor220315017s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The solution of most MCDM-problems involves measuring the characteristics of a research object, converting the estimations into a confidence distribution specified on a set of qualitative gradations and aggregating the estimations in accordance with the structure of the criteria system. The quality of the problems solution as a whole directly depends on the quality of measuring the characteristics of a research object. Data for obtaining estimations of the characteristics are often inaccurate, incomplete, approximate. Modern researches either fragmentarily touch on the questions of measurement quality, or focus on other questions. Our goal is to choose such parameters for converting the value of the quantitative characteristic of a research object into a confidence distribution, which provide the best measurement quality. Based on the observation channel (OC) concept proposed by G. Klir, we refined the measurement quality criteria, determined the composition of the OC parameters, developed an algorithm for calculating the measurement quality criteria and choosing the best OC for the most common MCDM-problems. As calculations have shown, in the most common MCDM-problems, the best is OC, which is built on the basis of a bell-shaped membership function and has a scale of seven blocks. The obtained result will allow researchers to justify the choice of OC parameters from the view-point of the maximum quality of measuring the quantitative characteristics of a research object in MCDM-problems and uncertainty conditions.","PeriodicalId":52438,"journal":{"name":"Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing the best observation channel parameters for measuring quantitative characteristics of objects in MCDM-problems and uncertainty conditions\",\"authors\":\"S. Sveshnikov, V. Bocharnikov, V. Penkovsky, Elena Dergileva\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/yjor220315017s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The solution of most MCDM-problems involves measuring the characteristics of a research object, converting the estimations into a confidence distribution specified on a set of qualitative gradations and aggregating the estimations in accordance with the structure of the criteria system. The quality of the problems solution as a whole directly depends on the quality of measuring the characteristics of a research object. Data for obtaining estimations of the characteristics are often inaccurate, incomplete, approximate. Modern researches either fragmentarily touch on the questions of measurement quality, or focus on other questions. Our goal is to choose such parameters for converting the value of the quantitative characteristic of a research object into a confidence distribution, which provide the best measurement quality. Based on the observation channel (OC) concept proposed by G. Klir, we refined the measurement quality criteria, determined the composition of the OC parameters, developed an algorithm for calculating the measurement quality criteria and choosing the best OC for the most common MCDM-problems. As calculations have shown, in the most common MCDM-problems, the best is OC, which is built on the basis of a bell-shaped membership function and has a scale of seven blocks. The obtained result will allow researchers to justify the choice of OC parameters from the view-point of the maximum quality of measuring the quantitative characteristics of a research object in MCDM-problems and uncertainty conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/yjor220315017s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/yjor220315017s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数mcdm问题的解决涉及测量研究对象的特征,将估计转换为一组定性层次上指定的置信分布,并根据标准体系的结构汇总估计。整体问题解决的质量直接取决于测量研究对象特征的质量。用来估计特性的数据往往是不准确的、不完整的和近似的。现代研究要么零散地涉及测量质量问题,要么集中于其他问题。我们的目标是选择这样的参数,将研究对象的定量特征值转换为提供最佳测量质量的置信分布。基于G. Klir提出的观测通道(OC)概念,对测量质量准则进行了细化,确定了OC参数的组成,并针对最常见的mcdm问题,开发了测量质量准则的计算算法和最佳OC的选择算法。计算表明,在最常见的mcdm问题中,最好的是OC,它建立在钟形成员函数的基础上,并且具有七个块的规模。所获得的结果将使研究人员能够从mcdm问题和不确定条件下测量研究对象的定量特征的最大质量的角度来证明OC参数的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choosing the best observation channel parameters for measuring quantitative characteristics of objects in MCDM-problems and uncertainty conditions
The solution of most MCDM-problems involves measuring the characteristics of a research object, converting the estimations into a confidence distribution specified on a set of qualitative gradations and aggregating the estimations in accordance with the structure of the criteria system. The quality of the problems solution as a whole directly depends on the quality of measuring the characteristics of a research object. Data for obtaining estimations of the characteristics are often inaccurate, incomplete, approximate. Modern researches either fragmentarily touch on the questions of measurement quality, or focus on other questions. Our goal is to choose such parameters for converting the value of the quantitative characteristic of a research object into a confidence distribution, which provide the best measurement quality. Based on the observation channel (OC) concept proposed by G. Klir, we refined the measurement quality criteria, determined the composition of the OC parameters, developed an algorithm for calculating the measurement quality criteria and choosing the best OC for the most common MCDM-problems. As calculations have shown, in the most common MCDM-problems, the best is OC, which is built on the basis of a bell-shaped membership function and has a scale of seven blocks. The obtained result will allow researchers to justify the choice of OC parameters from the view-point of the maximum quality of measuring the quantitative characteristics of a research object in MCDM-problems and uncertainty conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research
Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metric on the space of systems behavior functions represented by fuzzy measures Team-bounded DEA efficiency scores: The case of UEFA Champions League Players Bounds on eigenvalues of real symmetric interval matrices for αBB method in global optimization A managerial approach in resource allocation models: an application in us and Canadian oil and gas companies Neutrosophic MAGDM based on critic-EDAS strategy using geometric aggregation operator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1