残胃癌。病因及治疗。对过去5年的总体回顾

Braga Vlad, I. Slavu, Tulin Adrian, Socea Bogdan, Alecu Lucian
{"title":"残胃癌。病因及治疗。对过去5年的总体回顾","authors":"Braga Vlad, I. Slavu, Tulin Adrian, Socea Bogdan, Alecu Lucian","doi":"10.33695/jss.v6i3.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Gastric stump cancer (GSC) is an entity described in the literature as early as the 1920s. Along the years the clinicopathological characteristic had changed. At the moment, there are no well-established guidelines regarding the optimal treatment. \nMaterial and method: We conducted a literature review of the studies published from 2014 to 2019 using the PubMed database. \nResults: After searching the PubMed database for the keywords: “gastric remnant cancer” AND “stump” AND “neoplasm” we identified 167 articles. Of these, 25 studies were considered relevant. \nDiscussions: GSC develops after 2 years from the primary intervention for malignancy and after 20 years for benign lesions. The development mechanisms vary depending on the type of primary gastric lesions. GSC is considered a unique clinicopathological entity. The pattern of lymphatic drainage is different in comparison to primary gastric neoplasm. Thus an important negative prognostic factor is considered to be the N group of TNM staging. \nConclusion: More studies are required to improve the understanding of development mechanisms and evolution of this pathology. Survival after gastric cancer has increased and it is possible to observe an increased percentage of patients who achieve the 5-year survival interval after surgery. Currently, there are no guidelines to select the optimal treatment with regards to surgery or chemotherapy as pathology is rare and studies which investigate the evolution and prognosis lack a significant cohort of patients. Therefore, the existent data is not substantial enough to elaborate guidelines that would define a standard surgical treatment. \n ","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric stump cancer. Etiology and treatment. A general review of the last 5 years\",\"authors\":\"Braga Vlad, I. Slavu, Tulin Adrian, Socea Bogdan, Alecu Lucian\",\"doi\":\"10.33695/jss.v6i3.274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Gastric stump cancer (GSC) is an entity described in the literature as early as the 1920s. Along the years the clinicopathological characteristic had changed. At the moment, there are no well-established guidelines regarding the optimal treatment. \\nMaterial and method: We conducted a literature review of the studies published from 2014 to 2019 using the PubMed database. \\nResults: After searching the PubMed database for the keywords: “gastric remnant cancer” AND “stump” AND “neoplasm” we identified 167 articles. Of these, 25 studies were considered relevant. \\nDiscussions: GSC develops after 2 years from the primary intervention for malignancy and after 20 years for benign lesions. The development mechanisms vary depending on the type of primary gastric lesions. GSC is considered a unique clinicopathological entity. The pattern of lymphatic drainage is different in comparison to primary gastric neoplasm. Thus an important negative prognostic factor is considered to be the N group of TNM staging. \\nConclusion: More studies are required to improve the understanding of development mechanisms and evolution of this pathology. Survival after gastric cancer has increased and it is possible to observe an increased percentage of patients who achieve the 5-year survival interval after surgery. Currently, there are no guidelines to select the optimal treatment with regards to surgery or chemotherapy as pathology is rare and studies which investigate the evolution and prognosis lack a significant cohort of patients. Therefore, the existent data is not substantial enough to elaborate guidelines that would define a standard surgical treatment. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":33248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33695/jss.v6i3.274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33695/jss.v6i3.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃残端癌(GSC)是早在20世纪20年代文献中描述的一个实体。随着时间的推移,临床病理特征发生了变化。目前,关于最佳治疗方法尚无完善的指导方针。材料和方法:我们使用PubMed数据库对2014年至2019年发表的研究进行了文献综述。结果:在PubMed数据库中搜索关键词:“胃残癌”、“残肢”和“肿瘤”后,我们确定了167篇文章。其中,25项研究被认为是相关的。讨论:GSC发生于恶性肿瘤的初次干预后2年,良性病变的初次干预后20年。其发展机制因胃原发病变的类型而异。GSC被认为是一种独特的临床病理实体。与原发性胃肿瘤相比,淋巴引流模式不同。因此,TNM分期的N组被认为是一个重要的负面预后因素。结论:需要更多的研究来提高对该病理的发展机制和演变的认识。胃癌后的生存率增加了,并且有可能观察到术后达到5年生存期的患者百分比增加。目前,由于病理较少,研究进展和预后的研究缺乏重要的患者队列,没有关于手术或化疗选择最佳治疗方法的指南。因此,现有的数据不足以制定标准手术治疗的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gastric stump cancer. Etiology and treatment. A general review of the last 5 years
Introduction: Gastric stump cancer (GSC) is an entity described in the literature as early as the 1920s. Along the years the clinicopathological characteristic had changed. At the moment, there are no well-established guidelines regarding the optimal treatment. Material and method: We conducted a literature review of the studies published from 2014 to 2019 using the PubMed database. Results: After searching the PubMed database for the keywords: “gastric remnant cancer” AND “stump” AND “neoplasm” we identified 167 articles. Of these, 25 studies were considered relevant. Discussions: GSC develops after 2 years from the primary intervention for malignancy and after 20 years for benign lesions. The development mechanisms vary depending on the type of primary gastric lesions. GSC is considered a unique clinicopathological entity. The pattern of lymphatic drainage is different in comparison to primary gastric neoplasm. Thus an important negative prognostic factor is considered to be the N group of TNM staging. Conclusion: More studies are required to improve the understanding of development mechanisms and evolution of this pathology. Survival after gastric cancer has increased and it is possible to observe an increased percentage of patients who achieve the 5-year survival interval after surgery. Currently, there are no guidelines to select the optimal treatment with regards to surgery or chemotherapy as pathology is rare and studies which investigate the evolution and prognosis lack a significant cohort of patients. Therefore, the existent data is not substantial enough to elaborate guidelines that would define a standard surgical treatment.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
3D PRINTING IN PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDICS – THE NEW GENERATION OF PREOPERATIVE PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPEDICS SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF DOUBLE J URETERAL STENT LARYNGEAL SYNOVIAL SARCOMA – A CASE REPORT EARLY OUTCOME OF PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY IN SEPTUAGENARIANS AND OCTOGENARIANS IN NEPAL The efficacy of serial physical examination in management of penetrating abdominal trauma to avoid negative laparotomy in selected cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1