一种评估血糖仪性能的新方法:误差网格分析

Vandana Kumavat, M. Rojekar, Jayesh Panot, Arati Adhe-Rojekar
{"title":"一种评估血糖仪性能的新方法:误差网格分析","authors":"Vandana Kumavat, M. Rojekar, Jayesh Panot, Arati Adhe-Rojekar","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Glucose meters are excellent tools for self-monitoring of blood glucose especially in the circumstances where continuous monitoring is mandatory and at decision-making levels. Tight glycemic control protocols are important for preventing ill effects of fluctuating glucose levels. As technology advances, glucometers are getting better in terms of quality of results. The purpose here is to study the quality of glucose meter results in terms of clinical outcomes. The study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital. A total of 125 patients were recruited from pediatric wards. Bland-Altman plot, Parke error grid, and surveillance error grid analysis were used for comparing the results of the glucose meters with a standard laboratory method. It was found that there was a significant difference between the results of the 2 methods. Although usually minimal, the glucose meter results deviated from the results of the standard laboratory method. This will affect overall patient care especially in emergency conditions. Sometimes, the risk may be so high that the patient may be mislabeled as hypoglycemic when they actually are hyperglycemic and vice versa. This study is the first of its kind because no similar studies have been reported in the pediatric population. For effective use of glucose meters, the devices should give as accurate results as possible. Results should not only be accurate but also precise, without which critical errors may be possible. We recommend that for any glucose meter there should be regular calibration so that agreement with the reference laboratory method is maintained and effective medical decisions are possible.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Approach to Assess Performance of Glucometer: Error Grid Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vandana Kumavat, M. Rojekar, Jayesh Panot, Arati Adhe-Rojekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0000000000000150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Glucose meters are excellent tools for self-monitoring of blood glucose especially in the circumstances where continuous monitoring is mandatory and at decision-making levels. Tight glycemic control protocols are important for preventing ill effects of fluctuating glucose levels. As technology advances, glucometers are getting better in terms of quality of results. The purpose here is to study the quality of glucose meter results in terms of clinical outcomes. The study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital. A total of 125 patients were recruited from pediatric wards. Bland-Altman plot, Parke error grid, and surveillance error grid analysis were used for comparing the results of the glucose meters with a standard laboratory method. It was found that there was a significant difference between the results of the 2 methods. Although usually minimal, the glucose meter results deviated from the results of the standard laboratory method. This will affect overall patient care especially in emergency conditions. Sometimes, the risk may be so high that the patient may be mislabeled as hypoglycemic when they actually are hyperglycemic and vice versa. This study is the first of its kind because no similar studies have been reported in the pediatric population. For effective use of glucose meters, the devices should give as accurate results as possible. Results should not only be accurate but also precise, without which critical errors may be possible. We recommend that for any glucose meter there should be regular calibration so that agreement with the reference laboratory method is maintained and effective medical decisions are possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血糖仪是自我监测血糖的优秀工具,特别是在需要连续监测和决策的情况下。严格的血糖控制方案对于预防血糖水平波动的不良影响非常重要。随着技术的进步,血糖仪在结果质量方面越来越好。这里的目的是研究血糖仪结果的质量在临床结果方面。这项研究是在一家三级保健转诊医院进行的。从儿科病房共招募125名患者。使用Bland-Altman图、Parke误差网格和监视误差网格分析将血糖仪的结果与标准实验室方法进行比较。发现两种方法的结果有显著性差异。虽然通常最小,但血糖仪的结果偏离了标准实验室方法的结果。这将影响病人的整体护理,特别是在紧急情况下。有时,风险可能非常高,以至于患者可能被错误地标记为低血糖,而实际上他们是高血糖,反之亦然。这项研究是第一次,因为在儿科人群中没有类似的研究报道。为了有效地使用血糖仪,设备应提供尽可能准确的结果。结果不仅要准确,而且要精确,否则可能会出现严重的错误。我们建议对任何血糖仪进行定期校准,以便与参考实验室方法保持一致,并可能做出有效的医疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Approach to Assess Performance of Glucometer: Error Grid Analysis
Abstract Glucose meters are excellent tools for self-monitoring of blood glucose especially in the circumstances where continuous monitoring is mandatory and at decision-making levels. Tight glycemic control protocols are important for preventing ill effects of fluctuating glucose levels. As technology advances, glucometers are getting better in terms of quality of results. The purpose here is to study the quality of glucose meter results in terms of clinical outcomes. The study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital. A total of 125 patients were recruited from pediatric wards. Bland-Altman plot, Parke error grid, and surveillance error grid analysis were used for comparing the results of the glucose meters with a standard laboratory method. It was found that there was a significant difference between the results of the 2 methods. Although usually minimal, the glucose meter results deviated from the results of the standard laboratory method. This will affect overall patient care especially in emergency conditions. Sometimes, the risk may be so high that the patient may be mislabeled as hypoglycemic when they actually are hyperglycemic and vice versa. This study is the first of its kind because no similar studies have been reported in the pediatric population. For effective use of glucose meters, the devices should give as accurate results as possible. Results should not only be accurate but also precise, without which critical errors may be possible. We recommend that for any glucose meter there should be regular calibration so that agreement with the reference laboratory method is maintained and effective medical decisions are possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1